Supreme Court Nominee

It would really be useful if you would actually read occasionally. Maybe posting too close to IB is affecting you.

For the multipleth time: The DEMs were wrong then, the REPs are wrong now. Is that simple and straight forward enough for you? If I was posting back then about this topic, I would complain about Biden's behavior the same way. Yes, I am saying the bar should be raised back where it was because it is the right thing to do: hold the hearing and see if the nominee is worthy or not. If not, do not confirm.

The REPs are just following the sleazy things the DEMs did--see, I am criticizing BOTH, or is that too hard to read?

Nothing hypocritical about that. Originally Posted by Old-T

You'd be the jackass ignoramus that imagines that Republicans should play by a different set of rules than the dim-retards have been playing by, Old-THUMPER. As your boy Odumbo said, Old-THUMPER, "elections have consequences," and the Republicans control the Senate this time around, Old-THUMPER.

I think James Comey is about to put an end to the Hildabeast rule. Originally Posted by bambino

One can only hope so. Especially because the RWWs are doing their best to elect her. It is amazing to me that the RWWs are running head long towards nominating the one possible REP who could cause people to vote for the lying psychopath Clinton just because they are scared of the frightening angry man Trump.

It is a long shot, but I keep hoping Clinton gets indicted and Trump's abortion comments derail him. I NEVER thought a Sanders (YUCK!) vs Cruz (YUCK!) choice would look good by comparison.

Meanwhile, you're stupid enough to believe dim-retards would act differently and the BS nonsense you post, Old-THUMPER. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The LWWs would not. Unfortunately you see all 99.99% of the country left of you as fanatical retards. What you refuse to understand is that YOU are the one out on the fringe.

One can only hope so. Especially because the RWWs are doing their best to elect her. It is amazing to me that the RWWs are running head long towards nominating the one possible REP who could cause people to vote for the lying psychopath Clinton just because they are scared of the frightening angry man Trump.

It is a long shot, but I keep hoping Clinton gets indicted and Trump's aborting comments derail him. I NEVER thought a Sanders (YUCK!) vs Cruz (YUCK!) choice would look good by comparison. Originally Posted by Old-T

IIFFy, nobody uses more bandwidth to post less intelligent content than you do.

The LWWs would not. Unfortunately you see all 99.99% of the country left of you as fanatical retards. What you refuse to understand is that YOU are the one out on the fringe. Originally Posted by Old-T

Actually, you'd be the one on the lunatic fringe since you're too damn stupid to realize that dim-retards established the game rules the Republicans adopted in this instance, Old-THUMPER.

IIFFy, nobody uses more bandwidth to post less intelligent content than you do. Originally Posted by Old-T

You'd be the one wasting bandwidth, Old-THUMPER.

Damn right, he's a DJT supporter... or is there another explanation??? Bernboy is creating jobs... Soros is paying the 0zombies thugs $15.00 an hour to do the "Brown Shirt" thing.

Capitalism at it's finest...


fucker


. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Soros probably paid some guy to beat this guy up and try to frame Trump, didn't he?

It would really be useful if you would actually read occasionally. Maybe posting too close to IB is affecting you.

For the multipleth time: The DEMs were wrong then, the REPs are wrong now. Is that simple and straight forward enough for you? If I was posting back then about this topic, I would complain about Biden's behavior the same way. Yes, I am saying the bar should be raised back where it was because it is the right thing to do: hold the hearing and see if the nominee is worthy or not. If not, do not confirm.

The REPs are just following the sleazy things the DEMs did--see, I am criticizing BOTH, or is that too hard to read?

Nothing hypocritical about that. Originally Posted by Old-T

I agree with you, and the Republicans should eventually back down, hold a hearing, then vote him down. Then, they would have the high moral ground over the Democrats on this issue, could face the voters without fear, and hold onto the house and Senate and force Hillary (the unfortunately likely next President unless she is indicted like she deserves) to give us a non gay, moderate, reasonable justice.

I agree with you, and the Republicans should eventually back down, hold a hearing, then vote him down. Then, they would have the high moral ground over the Democrats on this issue, could face the voters without fear, and hold onto the house and Senate and force Hillary (the unfortunately likely next President unless she is indicted like she deserves) to give us a non gay, moderate, reasonable justice. Originally Posted by DSK

If "high moral ground" meant shit in politics, Hildabeast would be in prison and not the leading dim-retard candidate for president.

FYI, Justice Roberts was nominated for three separate positions before he ever received a hearing, and was granted that hearing, because the dim-retards weren't in control of the Senate anymore.

This is much ado about nothing. Obama is limping his way out of office. He can tango or do the wave, but that's about it. His last acts will be pardoning some criminals, including Hillary.

IIFFy, nobody uses more bandwidth to post less intelligent content than you do. Originally Posted by Old-T

Yea but I do it with class, unlike you 0ld-Tard...

Actually, you'd be the one on the lunatic fringe since you're too damn stupid to realize that dim-retards established the game rules the Republicans adopted in this instance, Old-THUMPER.


You'd be the one wasting bandwidth, Old-THUMPER.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

How about this one chicken dick???

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...0daf53aef7bc9?

How about this one chicken dick???

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...0daf53aef7bc9? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Go play in the street, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Consistency is a wonderful thing. Count on IB to ignore a question he doesn't want to hear. "it's just not fair to ask that!", you can hear is one functioning brain cell screaming out. "That only works for liberals! We Wacked Out Nut Case RWers deserve different rules. You can't attack one of my heroes that way!" As IBCondomMan runs of yo mommy. "Stop those bad HS kids, they don't play fair! They THINK. Make them stop, mommy! It isn't my fault I was born without a real brain."

Go play in the street, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Watch out for traffic chicken dick.