You are welcome, BIGGIE... http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...y-over-gun-lawThe attorney general of Wyoming should worry about his own pitiful state and not worry about New Jersey. I support concealed carry, but only when the person has a license to do so. Very simple reasoning -- I want to make sure that any person carrying a concealed handgun has at least a basic skill in handling the handgun and has a basic understanding of under what conditions that handgun should be used. That person is NOT, in any way, responsible for protecting ME.
. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Thought you bad ass right wing mother fuckers were daring anyone to kick down your door. Originally Posted by i'va biggenMaybe you forgot about the Tea Party flag...
I suspect I have a more extensive (and expensive) gun collection than most, if not all, of you. I can truthfully say that I have never, for even a brief moment, worried about the federal government coming into my home to confiscate any of my guns. By the same token, I do not have (or desire to have) an AK-47 or anything similar. Near as I can tell, I do not need an AK to knock down a deer or an elk. I suspect a well placed round from my .300 Weatherby Mag will do just fine!So, BigKoTex, all you've established is that you are not Randy Weaver and you weren't at Ruby Ridge in 1992.
Thank you anyway!
Trendy and the rest of his fellow cocksuckers must be scared of their own frigging shadows!
FACT JACK Originally Posted by bigtex
The attorney general of Wyoming should worry about his own pitiful state and not worry about New Jersey. I support concealed carry, but only when the person has a license to do so. Very simple reasoning -- I want to make sure that any person carrying a concealed handgun has at least a basic skill in handling the handgun and has a basic understanding of under what conditions that handgun should be used. That person is NOT, in any way, responsible for protecting ME. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXWyoming's AG has better reading skills than you, Speedy. It's your "pitiful" reading skills that caused you to miss where the AG is addressing a concern of Wyoming citizens.
Happy to see you're as stupid as ever. Here is the statement from the article to which Wyoming's AG was objecting:
Wyoming's AG has better reading skills than you, Speedy. It's your "pitiful" reading skills that caused you to miss where the AG is addressing a concern of Wyoming citizens. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Happy to see you're as stupid as ever. Here is the statement from the article to which Wyoming's AG was objecting:Read the article, Speedy. The Wyoming AG wants an unambiguous court ruling on which to base state law, you disingenuous ignoramus with pitiful reading skills.
In New Jersey, almost no one can obtain a concealed carry permit. In Wyoming, no one is required to have one.
I'll take the liberty to correct YOUR reading skills. I disagree 100% with Wyoming not requiring CHLs to those who want to carry concealed handguns.
According to the state of Wyoming:
Starting July 1, 2011 residents of Wyoming who meet the below listed requirements can carry a concealed handgun anywhere in the state that a person who obtains a Wyoming Concealed Firearms Permit can carry. They do not have to obtain any type of permit/license from the state to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Read the article, Speedy. The Wyoming AG wants an unambiguous court ruling on which to base state law, you disingenuous ignoramus with pitiful reading skills. Originally Posted by I B HankeringJackass. That is totally irrelevant to the point in the article to which I have trouble. In Wyoming anyone meeting certain requirements can carry a concealed handgun WITHOUT a CHL. I disagree with that. Has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Wyoming AG's disagreement with an ambiguous court ruling.
Jackass. That is totally irrelevant to the point in the article to which I have trouble. In Wyoming anyone meeting certain requirements can carry a concealed handgun WITHOUT a CHL. I disagree with that. Has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Wyoming AG's disagreement with an ambiguous court ruling. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXYou're now disingenuously trying to deflect from your original comment, Speedy, and needless to say, regarding your most recent post, the good citizens of Wyoming could give a fuck that you have personal issues with their Second Amendment rights.
You're now disingenuously trying to deflect from your original comment, Speedy, and needless to say, regarding your most recent post, the good citizens of Wyoming could give a fuck that you have personal issues with their Second Amendment rights. Originally Posted by I B HankeringAre you able to read at all??? Here is my original statement:
I suspect I have a more extensive (and expensive) gun collection than most, if not all, of you. I can truthfully say that I have never, for even a brief moment, worried about the federal government coming into my home to confiscate any of my guns. By the same token, I do not have (or desire to have) an AK-47 or anything similar. Near as I can tell, I do not need an AK to knock down a deer or an elk. I suspect a well placed round from my .300 Weatherby Mag will do just fine!
Thank you anyway!
Trendy and the rest of his fellow cocksuckers must be scared of their own frigging shadows!
FACT JACK Originally Posted by bigtex