BBBJCIM.........
There is no substitute!
sixx
@Sophia, yes very unlikely you will contract anything from daty, I agree but the risk is still there, and you can contract an std from bbbj, yes, perhaps higher risks but risks non the less.It's perfectly logical because the risk of one is SIGNIFICANTLY lower than the other. Just read about it. Giving BBBJ has an actual documented risk -- check out stats for throat gonorrhea in gay men for instance.... there is no documentation I could find that anyone has ever caught a disease from receiving DATY. So you have the one actual documented risk versus the other theoretical risk.
My beef is simple, if you are going to be cbj then you need to be no daty,,risks are risks..I do not see the logic in saying " cbj only because I am safe, but you can eat my pussy"
like speeding while driving, going 66mph is not as dangerous as going 80mph but its still a risk
if anyone is all consumed with the risks then stay at home and do not participate,
not such thing is 100% safe except for celibacy Originally Posted by RALPHEY BOY
Let me rephrase that: No CBJ Provider has answered my question as to why they only do CBJ but allow daty
You said no provider has ever answered your question. I JUST DID. If you can't see the logic in it then I don't know what to tell you. Originally Posted by Sensual Sophia
There is more Risk for GAY men Think about where the raw dick has been in other gay men. Originally Posted by Wyldeman30If they're the penetrator their risk is low, nearly to a heterosexual man's level, it's receiving anal sex that's most dangerous.