One World Currency

You're out of your depth, cum juggler. Go play with the dirty whoooores who will have your pitiful dick. Originally Posted by WombRaider
You are just upset because I won't let you suck my cock woomby ! You don't handle rejection well after all those previous times someone told you NO. Keep acting like the spoiled 3 year old that you are !
BigLouie's Avatar
No stupid. That's the dumbest motherfucking idea I've ever heard. Originally Posted by shanm
+1
  • DSK
  • 07-13-2015, 01:48 PM
No stupid. That's the dumbest motherfucking idea I've ever heard. Originally Posted by shanm
I agree completely. Printing money is the only thing our government has going for it. I'd hate to have to pay back the money the government owes through higher taxes or lesser Social Security.
localareaman's Avatar
With the European economy in the tank will the coming thing be a
one world currency??

The currencies would not have to be changed, all that would have
to be agreed upon is a one for one exchange rate between the dollar
and the euro, other world currencies would probably fall in line soon
after.

Very well could be one of the next step towards a one world government.
If it happens, a single currency could be issued after the single exchange
rate is established. Originally Posted by bojulay
I think the opposite is true. The euro's value is supported by the economy of a few nation's, and when a member nation defaults it's these economic powerhouses that end up footing the bill.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I agree completely. Printing money is the only thing our government has going for it. I'd hate to have to pay back the money the government owes through higher taxes or lesser Social Security. Originally Posted by DSK
You can't be that stupid.
  • DSK
  • 07-13-2015, 02:58 PM
You can't be that stupid. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I don't say the insiders aren't making out like bandits but when we "expand" the money supply that is free fucking money for the government.

Look up:

seignˇiorˇage

profit made by a government by issuing currency, especially the difference between the face value of coins and their production costs.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 07-13-2015, 03:08 PM
I don't say the insiders aren't making out like bandits but when we "expand" the money supply that is free fucking money for the government.

Look up:

seignˇiorˇage

profit made by a government by issuing currency, especially the difference between the face value of coins and their production costs. Originally Posted by DSK
COGay does not understand the difference between a factual comment and an endorsement.
dirty dog's Avatar
You're out of your depth, cum juggler. Go play with the dirty whoooores who will have your pitiful dick. Originally Posted by WombRaider
Why bring your mother and sister into this?
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I don't say the insiders aren't making out like bandits but when we "expand" the money supply that is free fucking money for the government.

Look up:

seignˇiorˇage

profit made by a government by issuing currency, especially the difference between the face value of coins and their production costs. Originally Posted by DSK
Tell yourself that when it takes a wheelbarrow full of Benjamins to buy a loaf of bread. Free money is not free. When additional dollars are added to the economy on the whim of the FED, every dollar loses value. I was wrong. You CAN be that stupid. There will come a point when the value of the dollar will drop too far, and the resulting collapse will be biblical in proportion.
  • DSK
  • 07-14-2015, 05:36 AM
Tell yourself that when it takes a wheelbarrow full of Benjamins to buy a loaf of bread. Free money is not free. When additional dollars are added to the economy on the whim of the FED, every dollar loses value. I was wrong. You CAN be that stupid. There will come a point when the value of the dollar will drop too far, and the resulting collapse will be biblical in proportion. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Maybe someday - but if we couldn't expand the economy's money supply, we couldn't pay for all the lazy assholes collecting free shit from the government.
Maybe someday - but if we couldn't expand the economy's money supply, we couldn't pay for all the lazy assholes collecting free shit from the government. Originally Posted by DSK
Spoken like a bonafide Jewish (Welshing) Lawyer!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Sounds like Whiny's about to crawl into his bunker...
  • DSK
  • 07-14-2015, 07:47 AM
Sounds like Whiny's about to crawl into his bunker... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Commie bastard asshole faggot from Austin - that's our boy Assup.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Lying, cheating, homophobic, xenophobic, bet welshing fraud from ... Well I guess that depends on which of his handles you're addressing.

Love Field motherfucker!

WK'ing for his Glory Hole partner. The only WK the Idiot Jihad has.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!
lustylad's Avatar
Oh hurr durr durr I made a mistake. Originally Posted by shanm
Yes, you did, shamfucker. Making mistakes is something you are very prone to do, especially when it comes to economics. Your inability to match up countries and currencies is but one example. Then there is this rambling nonsense:

If you're implementing a uniform currency then that means the price of goods everywhere will be the same, (otherwise everyone will engage in a process called arbitrage, which can not exist in the long run).
Think of another country like Pakistan, where the average yearly income is $9800. Can you imagine people in the U.S trying to support a family of 4 on 10 grand?
Maybe try using your tiny little head before posting bullshit like this. Originally Posted by shanm
Arbitrage doesn't require a common currency. It happens right now everyday with multiple currencies. And if some countries try to artificially over- or under-value their exchange rates, it only creates MORE opportunities for arbitraguers to exploit!

And Pakistan's per capita income isn't anywhere near the $9800 level you cite. Estimates vary, but even the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics puts it at around $1500. So you are off by a factor of 6X, you sloppy retard.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/889024/p...s-1513-a-year/

And before you try to save face by claiming that only makes your point stronger - it doesn't. The fact that the US uses a single currency hasn't reduced the income disparities that you and your fellow libtard dems keep fulminating about. Per capita income varies widely among the Eurozone countries too - even though they share the same currency. So once again, your "point" is invalid and not very well thought out.

On the bright side, this means as long as your skills don't slip when it comes to delivering your behind-the-dumpster services at Tallywackers, you and woomby don't need to worry about losing your jobs to the Pakis down the street working the dumpster behind the 7-11!

.