I completely understand what your saying. What isnt necessary is the things this man has said to me over the past year. We have history & he intentionally went on there and then made up extra shit that the reviewer didnt say. Then went back and exchanged convo with another male member. Thats NOT necessary. He isnt even in my damn city. Point is, this post that he made is dangerous and NOT okay.
When a gent has a good time, is it really necessary just to go under and make shrude remarks. Its not.
But hey, it is what it is.
I have rtm his post/pm/my review.
Now, lets just see how valid his claim is !!
Where is his proof of any of his accusations?
Originally Posted by TexasJess
I am not a fan at all of BLM69's posts, most of which are troll baiting posts, which are allowed and probably encouraged on Eccie. If you have had a bad history with him for over a year, that has nothing to do with him commenting on a recent review of yours, especially if what he said was not threatening or harrassing you. Sure, him saying he would not see you may not be what you want to see in the comments under a review of yours, but that is the price you pay for being a provider who places ads and get reviewed on a review board, everyone is different.
If there is a pattern of him making that comment on multple reviews of you, then that could be considered agenda laden cyberstalking and most smart guys can see right through that.
Similar threads like this one are very tricky. Since you cannot publish private communications, it all boils down to he said/she said. In those type scenarios, ONE reply from the accused is sufficient. Be the bigger person and do not respond to baiting posts and let the drama that is so prevalent on this site drag you down.