IBIdiot, with his associated masters degree, loves intellectual jousts like this one.
And Slobbrin is right behind him, carrying a noose.
Sons of Dixie!!!
Piyush is whitewashed till it ain't even funny. He chose an All-American "Bobby" name straight out of a "Leave it to Beaver" sitcom. He knew white Republicans would NOT accept Piyush so he bailed on it and his religion
shameful Originally Posted by Zanzibar789
This guy is NOT presidential material he should be nowhere near the top of any ticket unless it's Barnum and Bailey's. What a shameful representation from "Bobby" or should I say PiyushSo you would be content had he not changed his name or religious preference, Had a background in the motel,convienence store or liquor business. Ran for office as a liberal and snuck into the country illegally instead of being admitted as a promising contributor to our society. Makes perfect sense to me.......
First he changed his name to fit in. His name isn't Bobby Jindal it's Piyush Jindal. Then he changed his religion abandoning his faith to curry favor with the religious right.
Context:
The example of Jindal demonstrates the pressure to capitulate for the sake of political ambition. Jindal couldn't change his color, but he converted his religion to become less different from the dominant white Christians of his party.
His personal narrative amplifies his conversion to Roman Catholicism, even though he was raised Hindu by immigrant parents who were very active leaders in the local Hindu temple in Louisiana. He feels no qualms in making statements hurtful to the sentiments of the community from which he derives his "minority" card.
In a piece some years ago, he said when asked about his conversion: "the motivation behind my conversion, however, was my belief in one, objectively true faith (Christianity). If Christianity is merely one of many equally valid religions, then the sacrifices I made, including the loss of my family's peace, were senseless".
Presumably the conversion of his Hindu Punjabi wife to Roman Catholicism some years later occurred by her having coincidentally the exact same epiphany as he did.
To those of us Indian-Americans who are unwilling to obliterate our identity and get "digested" into the whitestream, Jindal is no trailblazer. He does not speak for us and merely uses his Indian-American status to gain leverage with Republicans who must now present a more inclusive face in order to remain relevant. His life underscores the fact that America has a long way to go before Indians and Hindus can project openly and without negative consequences the full range of their cultural and religious identity.
Source Originally Posted by Zanzibar789