Incredible

No he doesn't. You're an idiot.



Or lying. Originally Posted by Doove

Yes he does. Obama believes that the abortionist, who attempted to kill the baby and failed, should have the ability to withold care from the new born baby until it dies, if he determines that the baby isn't viable. This is comparable to witholding care from premature babies that don't have a good chance of survival; it's infanticide.

From nationalreview.com:

His voting record indicates that he does not believe infants deserve protection even once they have emerged from the womb if they are deemed to be below the age of viability, and he did in fact, three times, vote to keep a form of infanticide legal.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...atrick-brennan#

You really are a sick person. Some of the other libs in the Sandbox can be pretty angry and mean spirited; so can I at times; but you are in league by yourself. All kidding aside; you should be in therapy. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Thanks ,joe . It's all in good fun. Glad you like my
Post.

Next time I will consider more thoughtfully my decision to begin a thread on good things.

I liked it

I liked it Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Me, too. That's why I posted it.

Good pic and one that can only be fully appreciated by those who have had their own children.

Regarding all the other "off topic" posts: It must be wonderful to be in charge of how other people think.

It is an amazing photograph. Thanks.

Next time I will consider more thoughtfully my decision to begin a thread on good things. Originally Posted by LexusLover

you cant find (or post) a topic that joe cant shit on

you cant find (or post) a topic that joe cant shit on Originally Posted by CJ7

Yes, posting a pic of his face would be a violation of Board rules.

Good pic and one that can only be fully appreciated by those who have had their own children.... Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

.. or even cared for someone else's.

My hat's off to LL. Thanks for the incredible pic!

Thanks for the incredible pic! Originally Posted by bigtex

I was trying sense how the doctor must have felt at the moment ..
.... emotional no doubt.

You really are a sick person. Some of the other libs in the Sandbox can be pretty angry and mean spirited; so can I at times; but you are in league by yourself. All kidding aside; you should be in therapy. Originally Posted by joe bloe;105214938e4

This from the turd who just posted that everybody who believes in a woman's right to choose is "evil"....knucklehead.

This from the turd who just posted that everybody who believes in a woman's right to choose is "evil"....knucklehead. Originally Posted by timpage

thats the moral fiber of teapukes ... they expect freedom at every level as long as its THEIRS, they bid for smaller government yet are on a mission to create a larger government based on THEIR agenda, not anyone elses .. pass legislation that mandates THEY do something, and THEY go batshit crazy, but THEY have no problem with passing laws that mandates other people CANT do something ..

notice a pattern?

thats the moral fiber of teapukes ... they expect freedom at every level as long as its THEIRS, they bid for smaller government yet are on a mission to create a larger government based on THEIR agenda, not anyone elses .. pass legislation that mandates THEY do something, and THEY go batshit crazy, but THEY have no problem with passing laws that mandates other people CANT do something ..

notice a pattern? Originally Posted by CJ7

Overturning Roe v Wade would not outlaw abortion.

Overturning Roe v Wade, which is what I support, simply lets the individual states determine what sort of abortion laws they want. The federal government has no authority regarding abortion because the Constitution is silent on the issue; consequently, it's up to the states to decide.

The so called "right to privacy" which is what the Roe v Wade decision was based on, is an invention of a liberal court legislating from the bench.