And you are one of the biggest "intentionalist" on this board. Hey, I think I just made up a new word. I think you intend to lie with every piece you write. Just an opinion. Originally Posted by HedonistForeverPoint to the lie. Prove your accusation. I’ll wait.
HF. Still awaiting my many lies to be shown. I know you aren’t in the habit making a bunch of baseless accusations. Let’s see em old buddy. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
Do you realize they also read a script and maybe to some extent they improvise. I would question everything no matter what the News Source is. Originally Posted by Levianon17I don’t disagree with that all. I don’t take any of them at face value. But some are more reliable than others even if they have political leanings (Berman, Blitzer, Todd, Wallace, Baier). Some are just political hacks and aren’t and shouldn’t be considered journalists (Carlson, Hannity, Lemon, Maddow, basically anyone on any of the “cable news” channels in prime time).
I don’t disagree with that all. I don’t take any of them at face value. But some are more reliable than others even if they have political leanings (Berman, Blitzer, Todd, Wallace, Baier). Some are just political hacks and aren’t and shouldn’t be considered journalists (Carlson, Hannity, Lemon, Maddow, basically anyone on any of the “cable news” channels in prime time).I think they are more like Activists than Journalists. I think viewers have to be Objective to what is being presented to them by the News Media. It's rather hard to do because no one likes their world view to be swayed.
If anyone believes the prime time hosts are giving them news and facts they fit into the stupid category. Right there with the folks getting their news from Facebook and Twitter. Originally Posted by 1blackman1