Highly recommend Winter Soldier and God's Not Dead.

JD Barleycorn's Avatar
I wonder if anyone here besides me has seen the movie. I think this demonstrates pretty successfully how small and bitter some people can be.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 04-06-2014, 08:09 PM
You have no mind to judge others, Old-Twerp. Crawl back into your bottle and pickle your ignorance, Old-Twerp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Good to know you support your minion IIFFy's neo-Nazi political views. Not that I am shocked at the revelation. But if IIFFy is the Reichsfuehrer, and your lackey, you do know what that makes you....
I B Hankering's Avatar
Good to know you support your minion IIFFy's neo-Nazi political views. Not that I am shocked at the revelation. But if IIFFy is the Reichsfuehrer, and your lackey, you do know what that makes you.... Originally Posted by Old-T
You're the only minion here, Old-Twerp. And it's all well and good that you haven't been arrested for vagrancy, Old-Twerp, considering how your opinion has no visible means of support.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
You have no mind to judge others, Old-Twerp. Crawl back into your bottle and pickle your ignorance, Old-Twerp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
OMFG! JDIdiot posts a thread about him going to a Marvel Comics movie... Makes arrogant commentary... It's questioned... IFFFYYY makes an incoherent and offensive comment....it's challenged. IBIdiot to the WK rescue. And now we're teetering on the edge of another IBIdiot poo flinging.

Yawwwwn.... Here we go again. Maybe that's where bad threads go to die.

Bring it Corpy! We all know you're ready to show us your Funk and Wagnall's.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
I wonder if anyone here besides me has seen the movie. I think this demonstrates pretty successfully how small and bitter some people can be. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
small and bitter?

Talking about IBIdiot's JUNK again eh?
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 04-07-2014, 06:35 AM
Good to know you support your minion IIFFy's neo-Nazi political views. Not that I am shocked at the revelation. But if IIFFy is the Reichsfuehrer, and your lackey, you do know what that makes you.... Originally Posted by Old-T
You're the only minion here, Old-Twerp. And it's all well and good that you haven't been arrested for vagrancy, Old-Twerp, considering how your opinion has no visible means of support. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Go back and read IIFFy's belching vomit--he is in complete support of his Nazi-like oppression of "liberals" who don't have the "proper" opinions. This is the case even if the "liberals" are the majority. In other words he is in favor of goose-stepping oppression of anyone who opposes the Reichsfuehere's definition of proper thought. [And I really don't care if someone else thinks it sounds more Dzerzhinsky-like, it is the minority suppression of the masses based upon thought police. It is wrong and evil either way.] And since IIFFY only thinks what you espouse, and you refuse to speak up against your lap-dog, then by your own logic (repeated on here over and over), you must be of the same mind.

That is all the logical and "visible means of support" needed.

Let me give you the opportunity to correct yourself: Do you support the stifling and prosecution of those whose only "crime" it to have liberal principles, and who pushed those liberal principles forward via a majority vote? Do you believe the "right minded" minority has the right to do what IIFFY was espousing? A simple "YES" or "NO" to each of those questions will do.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Go back and read IIFFy's belching vomit--he is in complete support of his Nazi-like oppression of "liberals" who don't have the "proper" opinions. This is the case even if the "liberals" are the majority. In other words he is in favor of goose-stepping oppression of anyone who opposes the Reichsfuehere's definition of proper thought. [And I really don't care if someone else thinks it sounds more Dzerzhinsky-like, it is the minority suppression of the masses based upon thought police. It is wrong and evil either way.] And since IIFFY only thinks what you espouse, and you refuse to speak up against your lap-dog, then by your own logic (repeated on here over and over), you must be of the same mind.

That is all the logical and "visible means of support" needed.

Let me give you the opportunity to correct yourself: Do you support the stifling and prosecution of those whose only "crime" it to have liberal principles, and who pushed those liberal principles forward via a majority vote? Do you believe the "right minded" minority has the right to do what IIFFY was espousing? A simple "YES" or "NO" to each of those questions will do. Originally Posted by Old-T
Yeah, Old-Twerp, you're all about *fairness* and *equality* except when it doesn't fit your agenda, asshole.

there are too many guns out there, many are certainly in the hands of people who shouldn't have them, and some of the loudest gun-rights screamers are definitely ones who should not. Originally Posted by Old-T
You can take your hypocrisy and go screw yourself, Old-Twerp: yes or no?
JCM800's Avatar
"Yes or No" is way too complicated for IB to handle.
I B Hankering's Avatar
"Yes or No" is way too complicated for IB to handle. Originally Posted by JCM800
Have you yet mastered tying your shoes, 1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout: yes or no?
JCM800's Avatar
Are you going to shit in every thread today IB ...yes or no?
I B Hankering's Avatar
Are you going to shit in every thread today IB ...yes or no? Originally Posted by JCM800
Are you so stupid as to believe that ever did or could happen, 1-800-JCM-DATO: the lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM's soiled breechclout: yes or no?
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 04-07-2014, 10:48 AM
Go back and read IIFFy's belching vomit--he is in complete support of his Nazi-like oppression of "liberals" who don't have the "proper" opinions. This is the case even if the "liberals" are the majority. In other words he is in favor of goose-stepping oppression of anyone who opposes the Reichsfuehere's definition of proper thought. [And I really don't care if someone else thinks it sounds more Dzerzhinsky-like, it is the minority suppression of the masses based upon thought police. It is wrong and evil either way.] And since IIFFY only thinks what you espouse, and you refuse to speak up against your lap-dog, then by your own logic (repeated on here over and over), you must be of the same mind.

That is all the logical and "visible means of support" needed.

Let me give you the opportunity to correct yourself: Do you support the stifling and prosecution of those whose only "crime" it to have liberal principles, and who pushed those liberal principles forward via a majority vote? Do you believe the "right minded" minority has the right to do what IIFFY was espousing? A simple "YES" or "NO" to each of those questions will do. Originally Posted by Old-T
Yeah, Old-Twerp, you're all about *fairness* and *equality* except when it doesn't fit your agenda, asshole.


You can take your hypocrisy and go screw yourself, Old-Twerp: yes or no? Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The only "agenda" I had here was to point out the obvious Nazi-like beliefs of your lackey IIFFy.

I never thought even YOU would be so stupid and ego-driven to actually walk into this tread and defend those tactics. But you proved me wrong. As of today, right along with IBCondomman, IBBuffoon, and IBMassa' we now have you accepting the self-appointed title of IBFuehrer.

Well done. Most of us have seen the resemblance for a long time, but it makes it easier knowing that you approve of it.

By the way, what is "unfair" about my post? IIFFy posted the comment, I just pointed out the obvious parallels. It isn't my fault that he (and now you) are both stupid, oblivious, AND fascists at heart. That is on you, not me. Don't complain when my mirror shows you that you are truly evil at heart.

And while I am at it, since I myself am not a Nazi sympathizer, my pointing out the similarity between IIFFy and you and the Nazis is certainly not hypocritical.


"Yes or No" is way too complicated for IB to handle. Originally Posted by JCM800
Agreed. And as you can see, he couldn't answer it, could he!
I B Hankering's Avatar
The only "agenda" I had here was to point out the obvious Nazi-like beliefs of your lackey IIFFy.

I never thought even YOU would be so stupid and ego-driven to actually walk into this tread and defend those tactics. But you proved me wrong. As of today, right along with IBCondomman, IBBuffoon, and IBMassa' we now have you accepting the self-appointed title of IBFuehrer.

Well done. Most of us have seen the resemblance for a long time, but it makes it easier knowing that you approve of it.

By the way, what is "unfair" about my post? IIFFy posted the comment, I just pointed out the obvious parallels. It isn't my fault that he (and now you) are both stupid, oblivious, AND fascists at heart. That is on you, not me. Don't complain when my mirror shows you that you are truly evil at heart.

And while I am at it, since I myself am not a Nazi sympathizer, my pointing out the similarity between IIFFy and you and the Nazis is certainly not hypocritical. Originally Posted by Old-T
You're a liar when you say you have no agenda, Old-Twerp. Your fascist desire to repress the rights of those you disagree with is very apparent in your posts, Old-Twerp.


Agreed. And as you can see, he couldn't answer it, could he! Originally Posted by Old-T
No one died and left you in charge of a damn thing, Old-Twerp; so, you seriously need psychiatric help in your fantasy world if you believe you're deservedly entitled to a damn thing.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 04-07-2014, 12:30 PM
You're a liar when you say you have no agenda, Old-Twerp. Your fascist desire to repress the rights of those you disagree with is very apparent in your posts, Old-Twerp.

Dear IBFuehrer, it wasn't ME who was advocating a fascist, repressive though police revolution. It was your lackey, Reichsfuehrer IIFFy. I actually spoke out quite forcefully against it if you recall (you do recall, but you are loath to admit it). Where in my statement did I advocate curtailing anyone's rights? Oh, I said I didn't like people with mental problems or people with religious fanatic tendencies to have guns--do YOU want those folks armed? But unlike Reichsfuehrer IIFFy I didn't advocate repressing people who disagreed with me. So, again, you have been caught in a blatant lie. Not that catching you in a blatant lie is difficult, it isn't.

No one died and left you in charge of a damn thing, Old-Twerp; so, you seriously need psychiatric help in your fantasy world if you believe you're deservedly entitled to a damn thing. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
For once you are right--at least partially. I am not in charge of anything. I don't pretend to be. I am just one small voice pointing out when you go off the deep end as you typically do. Pointing out the hypocrisy of so much of what you say. Pointing out the hate and anger in your poor pitiful little life.

And it isn't really ME who deserves an answer, it is the casual visitor to this board, the people who might not realize that you are a raving lunatic spewing a dogma of anger and repression--just like your hero, IBFeuhrer. I don't NEED you to answer, because it is painfully obvious that you DO believe the "right minded" minority has the right to do what IIFFY was espousing and subjugate the majority just because the majority is too stupid to see the world as you see it.

Here you are, the big, bad, bellicose voice of 11,000+ diatribes and you are cowering and afraid of little harmless me? All I asked was the simple question: do you support your lackey's neo-Nazi views? You chose to sidestep the question--as is your typical MO. Your lie-filled rant against me for such a simple question is all the answer sane readers need.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 04-07-2014, 12:31 PM
Are you going to shit in every thread today IB ...yes or no? Originally Posted by JCM800
JCM, is that a trick question? You know IB can't help himself.