How would Al Jolson do today?????

I’d say 100 years ago was a different time.

And we all know why this is an important thread now, right?

But living in the past continues to be central to the neocons.

Comes as a tremendous shock, fellas!

On a similar note, I wonder how Attila the Hun would do today.

Or polio.

Or asbestos.

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHSH!!! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Sooooooo no need for the reparation talk. Or giving back land to mooslums.

GOTCHA

Just let a lib talk!

The people that don't study history and remember the past are doomed to repeat it


Somebody said that

Credit for that quote is given to George Santayana. Having seen reflected what some dipshit of the year wrote about the right being overly concerned with the past...who is currently tearing down statues and renaming buildings? Why are these people doing this? It is the mindless mob on the left that is "overly concerned" about the past but only selected past. They will not admit their roots in the KKK, Jim Crow, and modern human trafficking but they will accuse Ben Franklin of being a racist. The first great American abolitionist is a racist according to these jokers. They attack statue with moral indignation because those people represented by statues did great things in their lives. Those faceless little turds will never come close to doing anything. They lack the courage.

Sooooooo no need for the reparation talk. Or giving back land to mooslums.

GOTCHA

Just let a lib talk! Originally Posted by winn dixie

What does that have to do with Al Jolson?

Unless there’s some convoluted relationship between a thread about a Jewish man in blackface and “mooslums,” I don’t follow your logic.

Please clarify.

Thank you.

Speaking of black face. Did you know that Othello was black? As was the Moor in The Merchant of Venice. Do you really think they had a black man playing the parts before the 1950s? Edwin Booth appeared in black face and he was a southerner. There you go woketards, your next target.

? It is the mindless mob on the left that is "overly concerned" about the past but only selected past. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

although their claims have much to disagree with

the mob claims the police are vestiges of runaway slave patrols and thus as an institution today they are too stained to have worth and must be done away with

for them to be consistent, what does that say about the dimocrat party?

A different time

A different time


Originally Posted by VitaMan

So was slavery. But donate some of your money to reparations. That is, before you give up your life to depopulation. If you’re going to talk the talk, walk the walk.

Speaking of black face. Did you know that Othello was black? As was the Moor in The Merchant of Venice. Do you really think they had a black man playing the parts before the 1950s? Edwin Booth appeared in black face and he was a southerner. There you go woketards, your next target. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

robert downey went blackface in a vietnam era movie about some black soldiers.

So was slavery. But donate some of your money to reparations. That is, before you give up your life to depopulation. If you’re going to talk the talk, walk the walk. Originally Posted by bambino

Such a serious man. And always interested in other people's money....instead of earning it.

Such a serious man. And always interested in other people's money....instead of earning it. Originally Posted by VitaMan

I’ve earned plenty of money. I would bet more than you.

Hope you give it away before it is taken from you

Hope you give it away before it is taken from you Originally Posted by VitaMan

Physical gold and silver. Been paying cash over the years. I have enough if shit hits the fan. A great insurance policy.

robert downey went blackface in a vietnam era movie about some black soldiers. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Now that's a tough one...did Downey do black face? His character Kirk Lazarus had his skin medically altered to make it darker (that Lazarus was a real actor). So was it Downey (sarc.) or Lazarus.
Would it be the same concept if a woman appeared to be a man or a man appeared to be a woman? Sounds like it is the same concept. Oh boy, Jaye Davidson (The Crying Game), John Lithgow (The World According to Garp), and Jane March (The Color of Night) had better watch their backs.
How about a straight actor playing the part of a gay character or vise versa Ellen Page (Juno), Robert Preston (Victor/Victoria), or Alex Karras (also Victor/Victoria).

And Jeez, all those Italian actors who played the parts of Native American characters. Even John Wayne played Ghenghis Khan in a movie (The Conqueror).

I do laugh my ass off at this concept that LGBTQ actors need to play LGBTQ characters. Do these motherfuckers not understand the point of acting?