The Indictment

With the advancement of AI it would not surprise me that they are not actual tapes of Trump speaking. It also seemed likely the pictures were staged by FBI personnel. Based on the FISA court lies documented by the Inspector General, the FBI has a credibility problem.

... OK ... If you say so, mate...

You're the fellow who asked to see examples.
And I was ready to show you some.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

You're the fellow who was afraid of hijacking the thread.



Go ahead and provide a list here or start a new thread, but my answer would apply to a list. I don't need a list anymore because the defense makes no sense.

With the advancement of AI it would not surprise me that they are not actual tapes of Trump speaking. It also seemed likely the pictures were staged by FBI personnel. Based on the FISA court lies documented by the Inspector General, the FBI has a credibility problem. Originally Posted by farmstud60

AI: sounds like a nerd battle, but, yeah, the defense might be able to squeeze out some reasonable doubt on that one. The Defendant better not hire the Cyber Ninjas.



The far left and far right don't trust the FBI. If the jury comes from the middle, I don't think they'll buy the FBI Boogeyman Theory. We shall see.

The Defendant currently has the "right kind" of judge for the current federal charges, so we'll see.


Can you provide some examples (maybe just the big ones) of the lying and made up shit? 6 years is a lot to cover, and I'd rather work off your list than make one of my own. If you can't provide specific examples, with credible sources, it's more of an over-used talking point than anything else. Originally Posted by cc314

RUSSIA, RUSSIA,RUSSIA

RUSSIA, RUSSIA,RUSSIA Originally Posted by Jackie S

I had a feeling that would be on the list, and I have thoughts about that one, but picture this...


Your honor, members of the jury, after 6 years of being unjustly profiled, I should get a free pass on the current charges because, I WAS UNJUSTLY PROFILED FOR 6 YEARS.



I don't need to believe he was profiled justly or unjustly. The defense just doesn't work for me. He either committed the current crime(s) or not, past profiling or not. But I'm not his friendly judge, and juries can be hard to predict.