Encounter: Sundowner/Seductions

I made no other illusions except for the fact that Paul is continually calling Sam out in public about his actions instead of handling it in private. Originally Posted by dj8rocks

Asking why the PM is considered calling out a modtard these days???

And like OCD pointed out.... make it an education -- like you do in pgh....

Pauly might at times be a bit of a PITA......HOWEVER..........he does make very valid points.

Maybe the mods on here should take a few notes and step up their game.

For educational purposes only, this is the portion of the GL that applies each time you publicly call Sam out with an action he performs..



#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.



Just a few of your comments reflected at Sam:
How about ALL the mods learn to give a reason in the open so that EVERYONE benefits??? And thus.... way LESS -- "check pm".
Too bad common sense has left the building around here

I'm guessing that the members here would like a better explanation of why the "check pm" so that we could ALL become better reviewers.


Incorrect.
By stating what was lacking, it helps everyone in the community through education.

What about that do you not understand?

You don't spend enough time there then. DD is great, but with one of the mods, it's like he's working alone.... and with the other, it's like he's working with a broken arm....

These are just a few of the several times where you could have handled your concerns thru a private pm in an attempt to resolve the issues.


Just a brief history, Sam and I talked about encounters and how to go about making it easier for the OP, the mods and admins as well. If a review is missing a component, instead of just auto-rejecting it and then going back to edit the encounter to include the missing info. Then having to provide all the documentation to admins to grant PA to the member. Much easier to fix it before rejecting it.


Another example of trying to help the members to understand the minimum requirements for a review to be approved for PA:

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2484088

For educational purposes only, this is the portion of the GL that applies each time you publicly call Sam out with an action he performs..



#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.



Just a few of your comments reflected at Sam:
How about ALL the mods learn to give a reason in the open so that EVERYONE benefits??? And thus.... way LESS -- "check pm".
Too bad common sense has left the building around here

I'm guessing that the members here would like a better explanation of why the "check pm" so that we could ALL become better reviewers.


Incorrect.
By stating what was lacking, it helps everyone in the community through education.

What about that do you not understand?

You don't spend enough time there then. DD is great, but with one of the mods, it's like he's working alone.... and with the other, it's like he's working with a broken arm....

These are just a few of the several times where you could have handled your concerns thru a private pm in an attempt to resolve the issues.


Just a brief history, Sam and I talked about encounters and how to go about making it easier for the OP, the mods and admins as well. If a review is missing a component, instead of just auto-rejecting it and then going back to edit the encounter to include the missing info. Then having to provide all the documentation to admins to grant PA to the member. Much easier to fix it before rejecting it.


Another example of trying to help the members to understand the minimum requirements for a review to be approved for PA:

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2484088 Originally Posted by dj8rocks

Again, if that passes for calling out a modtard, things have devolved into a sorrier state than even I had imagined.

And again.... IF this is what you would have us believe:

Just a brief history, Sam and I talked about encounters and how to go about making it easier for the OP, the mods and admins as well. If a review is missing a component, instead of just auto-rejecting it and then going back to edit the encounter to include the missing info. Then having to provide all the documentation to admins to grant PA to the member. Much easier to fix it before rejecting it.

And... you did in fact send the OP a PM.... why does it need to be ANNOUNCED in the thread??
The ECCIE email, and the big red envelope, AND the popup that you get telling you that you have a pm isn't enough to let the OP know that something is amiss??? You need to post it for ALL to see in the forums??? And again, if you are going to announce that something is amiss... then let us ALL know what is freaking amiss....


edit add: Perhaps you and Sam might want to rethinck that process you guys came up with
I want to be a SHMB Lawyer when I grow up....

And I'm still waiting to find out which modtard I disrespected that lead to my warning?? This post if you have forgotten:

You are aware that someday some modturd will thinck he is overachieving and move this to another area of the board where it will do no one any good..... Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

Pauly might at times be a bit of a PITA......HOWEVER..........he does make very valid points.

Maybe the mods on here should take a few notes and step up their game. Originally Posted by 57fubar

fuckin fubar.....

Paul, you have been a member here for a number of years, surely you know that not everyone has the time to stay logged in multiple hours a day. And that many have their account setting set so that they don't receive notifications for obvious reasons.


Most of your questions have already been answered in my posts. If you are aspiring to become a SHMB lawyer, read the info being presented to you. Whether or not you accept it or believe it is of little importance to me. I've tried to help explain some of your questions, but as the conversation is still at the point it was to begin with, there is no point in continuing it.


And on a final note, no, I will not consider a change to a process to appease one member just because they don't like it.


Have a good day sir

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2484088 Originally Posted by dj8rocks

thanks for pointing out something errr never mind they will never get it

So to recap specifically,

You are aware that someday some modturd will thinck he is overachieving and move this to another area of the board where it will do no one any good..... Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

No one has offered anything to specify which modtard was disrespected. Thus, The warning from Samcro is unwarranted.
Duly noted.

I want to be a SHMB Lawyer when I grow up....
Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

I misspoke.
What I meant to say was:
[Sarcasm] I want to be a SHMB Lawyer when I grow up.... [/Sarcasm]
Sorry to anyone who misunderstood.

And to recap generally....

Paul, you have been a member here for a number of years, surely you know that not everyone has the time to stay logged in multiple hours a day. And that many have their account setting set so that they don't receive notifications for obvious reasons.


Most of your questions have already been answered in my posts. If you are aspiring to become a SHMB lawyer, read the info being presented to you. Whether or not you accept it or believe it is of little importance to me. I've tried to help explain some of your questions, but as the conversation is still at the point it was to begin with, there is no point in continuing it.


And on a final note, no, I will not consider a change to a process to appease one member just because they don't like it.




Have a good day sir Originally Posted by dj8rocks

I'll bet one can count on two hands how many people here have all three of the notification settings I mentioned turned off. And as a practical matter, if they are smart enough to do that, they probably aren't fucking up their reviews.... and if they did perchance make a mistake, they are probably aware that they made a mistake, and check their pm's all by themselves with no need for public shaming with no education trade off


Sounds like someone is being inflexible then.

More inflexibility? In addition to the 11 or so guys in Awbany who thinck it's a good idea to change the process, there are two or three who suggested as much in this very thread.... but whadda I know?

Have a good day sir Originally Posted by dj8rocks

And you also.

So Seductions is open early and many girls will offer extras?

So Seductions is open early and many girls will offer extras? Originally Posted by Komey1

......trying to steer this back on point?? .......good move

hardly

All posts here not related to the encounter report should be clipped and moved to a separate new thread. And you guys could have it out there. But all of this off topic bullshit within the report is a disservice to to the OP, and had this been a provider report, to her.

Shhhhhhh

They'll probably clese it since I got the best of 'em once again.....