Nature and Extent of Misconduct

You know what else might be hard to brush aside? Zelensky, the President of Ukraine saying there was no quid pro quo, no pressure, no bribery. If you can't get the object of the "bribe" to confirm the bribe, you have a problem, well, if you were in a court of law but we all know this is no court of law. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

That's the easy part. First of all Zelensky isn't even needed in this part of the process. Especially when you have a confession from the defendant. Coupled with an endless array of corroborating factual whitnesses. Even Mulvaney, who's too scared to face the music.

Second, many a conviction have been found where the victim refuses to press charges. The law still has been broken. A violated party need not feel pressure to state the obvious. Evidence and witnesses are all that's needed. But this is not a court of law.

A Political Process still has to be in accordance with the rule of law and abide by all aspects of the Constitution. Since this Impeachment Process has been handled by morons that have been side stepping the protocols of the Impeachment Process it will imminently fail. Originally Posted by Levianon17

Be that as it may, the impeachment will not fail. The failure will be from the Senators who do not vote to remove.


https://n.pr/2Ymai1r

Rep. Adam Schiff: 'The Uncontested Facts Show This President Solicited A Bribe'

Central to Democrats' argument for impeachment is the allegation that Trump engaged in presidential misconduct when he tried to get Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to open investigations that were politically beneficial to Trump.

Democrats say that in exchange for investigations, which included the family of political rival and former Vice President Joe Biden, the Trump administration would release roughly $400 million in military assistance and grant Zelenskiy an Oval Office meeting with Trump, which officials in Ukraine desperately wanted.

That's the easy part. First of all Zelensky isn't even needed in this part of the process. Especially when you have a confession from the defendant. Coupled with an endless array of corroborating factual whitnesses. Even Mulvaney, who's too scared to face the music.

Second, many a conviction have been found where the victim refuses to press charges. The law still has been broken. A violated party need not feel pressure to state the obvious. Evidence and witnesses are all that's needed. But this is not a court of law.



Be that as it may, the impeachment will not fail. The failure will be from the Senators who do not vote to remove.


https://n.pr/2Ymai1r

Rep. Adam Schiff: 'The Uncontested Facts Show This President Solicited A Bribe' Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

"Even as it laid out the case against Trump, the report offered NO details."

FTFY


BAHHAHAAAA

That's the easy part. First of all Zelensky isn't even needed in this part of the process. Especially when you have a confession from the defendant. Coupled with an endless array of corroborating factual whitnesses. Even Mulvaney, who's too scared to face the music.

Second, many a conviction have been found where the victim refuses to press charges. The law still has been broken. A violated party need not feel pressure to state the obvious. Evidence and witnesses are all that's needed. But this is not a court of law.



Be that as it may, the impeachment will not fail. The failure will be from the Senators who do not vote to remove.


https://n.pr/2Ymai1r

Rep. Adam Schiff: 'The Uncontested Facts Show This President Solicited A Bribe' Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Don't listen to Adam Schiff he's a fucking moron. He's had this impeachment scheme conjured up before Trump even got through the front door of the White House.

Don't listen to Adam Schiff he's a fucking moron. He's had this impeachment scheme conjured up before Trump even got through the front door of the White House. Originally Posted by Levianon17

He impeached a judge. Not ao much a moron. But thanks, none the less. I'll listen to the evidence.

He impeached a judge. Not ao much a moron. But thanks, none the less. I'll listen to the evidence. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Yeah you do that.

He impeached a judge. Not ao much a moron. But thanks, none the less. I'll listen to the evidence. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

what evidence? name one person who testified that contradicted the transcript that was released? name one law anyone testified that Trump broke? we'll wait ..


here's you evidence sucker ... "i think orange man BAD!"


Schiff is already shitting himself because he knows McConnell will call him to testify. and the whistleblower and the ICIG. it'a game over sparky.


Schiff is trying to weasel his way out of it already. not gonna work. he's toast.


Schiff: I have ‘nothing’ to testify about if called for impeachment trial

https://nypost.com/2019/11/24/schiff...achment-trial/


BAHHAHHAAAAAAAAA


Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ct/4180342002/


"Rep. Adam Schiff, chair of the House intelligence committee, wrongly implied that his committee had no contact with the whistleblower before receiving the complaint. Schiff claimed, “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower,” when the whistleblower had in fact reached out to a committee aide before filing a complaint."


BAHHAHHAAAAAAAAAA


Top Republican on House Judiciary Committee calls for Adam Schiff to testify

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/01/polit...ent/index.html


THE ICIG WILL TESTIFY TOO ...


Rep. Ratcliffe Explains Why Adam Schiff Continues to Hold Back Transcript of ICIG Atkinson’s Testimony

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-v...sons-testimony


ICIG Atkinson Refuses to Tell Congress Why Whistleblower Rule Changes Were Backdated

https://amgreatness.com/2019/10/07/i...ere-backdated/


Mitch will make them testify ... GAME OVER sparky.


BAHHAHHAHHAAAA

what evidence? name one person who testified that contradicted the transcript that was released? name one law anyone testified that Trump broke? we'll wait ..


here's you evidence sucker ... "i think orange man BAD!"


Schiff is already shitting himself because he knows McConnell will call him to testify. and the whistleblower and the ICIG. it'a game over sparky.


Schiff is trying to weasel his way out of it already. not gonna work. he's toast.


Schiff: I have ‘nothing’ to testify about if called for impeachment trial

https://nypost.com/2019/11/24/schiff...achment-trial/


BAHHAHHAAAAAAAAA


Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ct/4180342002/


"Rep. Adam Schiff, chair of the House intelligence committee, wrongly implied that his committee had no contact with the whistleblower before receiving the complaint. Schiff claimed, “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower,” when the whistleblower had in fact reached out to a committee aide before filing a complaint."


BAHHAHHAAAAAAAAAA


Top Republican on House Judiciary Committee calls for Adam Schiff to testify

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/01/polit...ent/index.html


THE ICIG WILL TESTIFY TOO ...


Rep. Ratcliffe Explains Why Adam Schiff Continues to Hold Back Transcript of ICIG Atkinson’s Testimony

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-v...sons-testimony


ICIG Atkinson Refuses to Tell Congress Why Whistleblower Rule Changes Were Backdated

https://amgreatness.com/2019/10/07/i...ere-backdated/


Mitch will make them testify ... GAME OVER sparky.


BAHHAHHAHHAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Game over my ass. This is only the start of the second quarter.

Keep promulgating your stupid conspiracy theories. The first sentence of your redstate prattle states "repellent Adam Schiff" and Mickey Mouse impeachment". How can you take yourself serious?

If, and it is a big IF, Adam Schiff testifies, all he has to do is what Robert Meuller did. Just tell the Senate that he will not deviate from what is in the report to impeach. But except, in this case, it is not up to the POTUS controlled DOJ to dismiss the findings, it's up to the POTUS controlled Senate to disregard their duty.

He's going to be impeached. Let's hope the Senate will find its backbone, balls and guts. Execute the mo'fucker!

This is only the start of the second quarter. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Well, I'm glad you are finally facing up to things, but it's just a little further than the start of the second quarter(almost mid second quarter). The second quarter started back in January 2019. The second half will start January 2021.

Its all about dragging this shit show out as long as possible ,,,,,,,,, Because there is NOTHING to see ,,,,

The testifying witness states just because his poodle seems mad doesn't mean you should impeach.

Be careful DPST's - the Senate is not the slanted, hyper-partisan House that has longed for Impeachment since nov 2016.

Be careful what you wish for - those with no clue to the fact that actions have consequences
Typical of DPST mentality!

Little . . . little . . . boy.

name-calling and scatology - that is all 9500 and the DPST's have.
Not even a smidgen of a denial or counter argument - typical DPST!!!
I think the DPST House will vote to impeach - and when a senate trial occurs with open and non-partisan rules - the lies of the DPST's and corruption and malfeasance will be exposed.

LOL

Little . . . little . . . crybaby.

Game over my ass. This is only the start of the second quarter.

Keep promulgating your stupid conspiracy theories. The first sentence of your redstate prattle states "repellent Adam Schiff" and Mickey Mouse impeachment". How can you take yourself serious?

If, and it is a big IF, Adam Schiff testifies, all he has to do is what Robert Meuller did. Just tell the Senate that he will not deviate from what is in the report to impeach. But except, in this case, it is not up to the POTUS controlled DOJ to dismiss the findings, it's up to the POTUS controlled Senate to disregard their duty.

He's going to be impeached. Let's hope the Senate will find its backbone, balls and guts. Execute the mo'fucker!


Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

so Schiff's strategy is act like a senile old fool? okay ..


BAHHAAA


you do know that the press made a big deal about Mueller testifying and how it was going to "take down" Bill Barr yeah? didn't happen. Mueller's testimony was a disaster for the Democrats. Schiff's will be even worse.


so what's Schiff going to say when asked directly if he had contact with the whistle blower before filing his report? he's already admitted he did. is he gonna take the 5th? yeah .. that's gonna look good on the evening news isn't it?


Atkinson will have to admit he changed the rules for what is considered an urgent concern. which goes directly to Schiff's Intel committee. why hasn't Schiff released his testimony?


it draws a direct line from the patsy to Schiff is why. it also ruins the narrative that Barr and Maguire "colluded" to prevent the complaint from being sent to Congress. the initial complaint was rejected because it was second hand. the rules were changed to allow it.


both Schiff and Atkinson have confirmed their actions and contact. the whistle blower's bias was also withheld from Maguire.


you are right about one thing, McConnell will hold a trial. and his "star witnesses" will be the pencilneck and Atkinson.


BAHHAHAAAAA