Still not safe, still not effective.

offshoredrilling's Avatar
FL has the right IDEA

you can take if you want

but should be only 65 and older
and please ask a Doc first


Sorry BUT I'm in favor of all left wing to fake for ...
adav8s28's Avatar
Myself. I will never inject myself with nanbots that can change my dna and enable the government to track me.
No sir. No jab for me Originally Posted by winn dixie
M_RNA can't alter or change DNA. M_RNA can only give the instructions to make a specific amino acid sequence that results in a specific protein. Antibodies are proteins that neutralizes a foreign invader also known as an Antigen. Sars_Co_V2 would be an antigen if it got into your system. The survival rate for Sars_Co_V2 is around 99%. If you are under 65 just do like Waco Kid, take the Zinc, Vitamin D3 and Ozarka water. You should be okay. Have a nice day!
texassapper's Avatar
M_RNA can't alter or change DNA. M_RNA can only give the instructions to make a specific amino acid sequence that results in a specific protein. Antibodies are proteins that neutralizes a foreign invader also known as an Antigen. Sars_Co_V2 would be an antigen if it got into your system. The survival rate for Sars_Co_V2 is around 99%. If you are under 65 just do like Waco Kid, take the Zinc, Vitamin D3 and Ozarka water. You should be okay. Have a nice day! Originally Posted by adav8s28
What about Chloroquine? What about Ivermectin?
FesteredUncle's Avatar
Well I’m glad I don’t have a vagina because I’m getting the booster next week. I’ll check back in to let you know I survived. Originally Posted by Tiny
Congrats on your elite-hood membership status. Indications are only 2 percent of the population are gullible enough to take another shot for the cause. Enjoy that rarefied air while you can. It could be your last gasp from behind a mask that won't even repulse smoke particles, which are 1,000 time larger that the covid...
  • Tiny
  • 10-16-2023, 07:53 PM
Congrats on your elite-hood membership status. Indications are only 2 percent of the population are gullible enough to take another shot for the cause. Enjoy that rarefied air while you can. It could be your last gasp from behind a mask that won't even repulse smoke particles, which are 1,000 time larger that the covid... Originally Posted by FesteredUncle
Thanks for the reminder! I'm all set, will get the new COVID booster and the flu vaccine tomorrow at 6:40 PM. Please pray for me!

I like your new avatar better by the way. Mitch McConnell is a true American Hero! I'm absolutely not anti Trans or anything but the "lady" in the old photo was absolutely hideous. Not even Chung Tran would do her. That's if she really were a woman, Chung only does biological women.
  • Tiny
  • 10-16-2023, 08:00 PM
What about Chloroquine? What about Ivermectin? Originally Posted by texassapper
I looked into hydroxychloroquinine years ago. It's used to prevent malaria and I was traveling to a malaria infested area. I remember some of the side effects were nasty. I figured I'd rather slather on the DEET and take my chances. Anyway I wouldn't take the stuff like President Trump did to try to prevent COVID.

And if I got COVID, I'd take Paxlovid if recommended by the physician. It works a lot better than hydroxychloroquinine and ivermectin. Better to take an anti-COVID drug instead of an anti-malarial or antiparasitic drug if you've got COVID I figure.
FesteredUncle's Avatar
Those lying numbers keep haunting us. Since the covid, we have seen a tad over 2,000 highly healthy athletes - at their peak and prime, suffer serious health related issues - suddenly. Things like collapsing on the field of play. Of those, about 1,400 died. Most "injuries" and deaths were heart related. Now myocarditis is a household familiarity.

Doctors and scientists are baffled over the spike (pun intended) of the most healthy dying so suddenly, given that they are in peak health, prime age and conditioning. Surely there is a commonality among them, yet they cannot see it. Well, that is until you search for the commonality trait that they all share.

Go ahead. You can guess what it is. We all know. No need to spoiler alert this one: "all of the athletes on the list share one common factor: They suffered sudden serious health issues after receiving one or more doses of Covid shots."
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
I looked into hydroxychloroquinine years ago. It's used to prevent malaria and I was traveling to a malaria infested area. I remember some of the side effects were nasty. I figured I'd rather slather on the DEET and take my chances. Anyway I wouldn't take the stuff like President Trump did to try to prevent COVID.

And if I got COVID, I'd take Paxlovid if recommended by the physician. It works a lot better than hydroxychloroquinine and ivermectin. Better to take an anti-COVID drug instead of an anti-malarial or antiparasitic drug if you've got COVID I figure. Originally Posted by Tiny
Ivermectin never went through testing to prove it effective or ineffective against Covid. Almost 99% of the people who get Covid will recover. There is no clinical proof that ivermectin helps. Clinical trials proved that Paxlovid helps.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Those lying numbers keep haunting us. Since the covid, we have seen a tad over 2,000 highly healthy athletes - at their peak and prime, suffer serious health related issues - suddenly. Things like collapsing on the field of play. Of those, about 1,400 died. Most "injuries" and deaths were heart related. Now myocarditis is a household familiarity.

Doctors and scientists are baffled over the spike (pun intended) of the most healthy dying so suddenly, given that they are in peak health, prime age and conditioning. Surely there is a commonality among them, yet they cannot see it. Well, that is until you search for the commonality trait that they all share.

Go ahead. You can guess what it is. We all know. No need to spoiler alert this one: "all of the athletes on the list share one common factor: They suffered sudden serious health issues after receiving one or more doses of Covid shots." Originally Posted by FesteredUncle
\

Total nonsense. Unfortunately people will leap to unsupported assumptions. Very common among Trumpettes.

"Background and aim Lay people and medical professionals have suggested a link between (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccination and a purported increase in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and death (SCD) among athletes. We aimed to compare the athlete death rate in 2021-2022 with pre-pandemic estimates and investigate the role of vaccination.

Conclusion SCD rate among young US athletes in 2021-2022 was comparable to pre-pandemic estimates. There is currently no evidence to substantiate a link between (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccination and SCD in (young) athletes."


https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....13.23285851v1

"No evidence athletes at risk for cardiac arrest after COVID vaccinations

There are currently no available scientific reports that provide an evidence-based framework to prove causality between the reported events and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination."

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/...d-vaccinations

"Claims baselessly link COVID vaccines to athlete deaths"

https://apnews.com/article/fact-chec...0-989195878254
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Those lying numbers keep haunting us. Since the covid, we have seen a tad over 2,000 highly healthy athletes - at their peak and prime, suffer serious health related issues - suddenly. Things like collapsing on the field of play. Of those, about 1,400 died. Most "injuries" and deaths were heart related. Now myocarditis is a household familiarity.

Doctors and scientists are baffled over the spike (pun intended) of the most healthy dying so suddenly, given that they are in peak health, prime age and conditioning. Surely there is a commonality among them, yet they cannot see it. Well, that is until you search for the commonality trait that they all share.

Go ahead. You can guess what it is. We all know. No need to spoiler alert this one: "all of the athletes on the list share one common factor: They suffered sudden serious health issues after receiving one or more doses of Covid shots." Originally Posted by FesteredUncle
I suppose you have a link to that report? I’d love to read it. Please and thank you!
Ivermectin never went through testing to prove it effective or ineffective against Covid. Almost 99% of the people who get Covid will recover. There is no clinical proof that ivermectin helps. Clinical trials proved that Paxlovid helps. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
That's why none of these concoctions are necessary. If Covid had a 50% mortality rate then I could see the scramble to find a viable treatment or vaccine.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
That's why none of these concoctions are necessary. If Covid had a 50% mortality rate then I could see the scramble to find a viable treatment or vaccine. Originally Posted by Levianon17
Over 1 million people died in the U.S due to Covid. Had an effective vaccine not been created, the number of deaths would have been much higher according to EVERY estimate made by experts. I know you will disagree with these experts since their modeling estimates disagree with your uneducated POV.

"US COVID death toll would be 4X higher without vaccines, modeling study finds"

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022...g-study-finds/

"Two Years of U.S. COVID-19 Vaccines Have Prevented Millions of Hospitalizations and Deaths"

https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blo...spitalizations

"COVID-19 preventable mortality

This updated analysis estimates that nationally at least 234,000 deaths from COVID-19 between June 2021 and March 2022 could have been prevented with a primary series of vaccinations. These vaccine-preventable deaths represent 60% of all adult COVID-19 deaths since June 2021, when vaccines first became widely available to adults across the country, and a quarter (24%) of the nearly 1 million COVID-19 deaths since the pandemic began."

https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covi...th-in-the-u-s/

Do I really have to once again post statistics of Covid related deaths by vaccination status?
Over 1 million people died in the U.S due to Covid. Had an effective vaccine not been created, the number of deaths would have been much higher according to EVERY estimate made by experts. I know you will disagree with these experts since their modeling estimates disagree with your uneducated POV.

"US COVID death toll would be 4X higher without vaccines, modeling study finds"

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022...g-study-finds/

"Two Years of U.S. COVID-19 Vaccines Have Prevented Millions of Hospitalizations and Deaths"

https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blo...spitalizations

"COVID-19 preventable mortality

This updated analysis estimates that nationally at least 234,000 deaths from COVID-19 between June 2021 and March 2022 could have been prevented with a primary series of vaccinations. These vaccine-preventable deaths represent 60% of all adult COVID-19 deaths since June 2021, when vaccines first became widely available to adults across the country, and a quarter (24%) of the nearly 1 million COVID-19 deaths since the pandemic began."

https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covi...th-in-the-u-s/

Do I really have to once again post statistics of Covid related deaths by vaccination status? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
You can post what ever you want. I would be cautious of information that has never been proven in the real world.
FesteredUncle's Avatar
Do I really have to once again post statistics of Covid related deaths by vaccination status? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Yes, but first: Define what a covid death is. Then tell us about said "modeling study", without using the phrase "Neil Furguson". Thx

Perhaps, if time allows, you might clarify the terms "due to the covid" vs "from the covid" vs "with the covid". Seems to be some overlap. Again, thx.
FesteredUncle's Avatar
I suppose you have a link to that report? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Of course I do, instead I am willing to supply a search string for it: "1400 Athletes Died Suddenly Since End of 2020"