If you're married, your cheating on your wife. It's adultery. You should feel guilty. Don't even get into the hobby. If you're not getting what you need at home and you can't get her to go to counseling then why are you staying there? Marriage should have it all, if it doesn't, get out I say. She should care deeply about your needs and you should about hers. There is someone out there who might be a better match.
Seeing an escort isn't going to save your marriage oe change your life. It's only going to complicate it and if you get snagged you're in for a world of hurt. You'll be fooling yourself if you think it's going to help you.
Originally Posted by Maximum4
I think this view has some merits in terms of moral absolutism, but I think it misses a hierarchy of values.
Stealing is stealing. Is it wrong to steal? Yes.
If you knew that I had a key to an atomic weapon I was planning to detonate in NYC and kill millions of people; and you had an opportunity to steal that key ... and that was the only way to stop me ... should you allow me to kill millions of people so your sould would be free of the guilt from stealing?
Few things in this world are so simple that they can be analyzed in the terms you have used. There is a hierarchy of values. While we might acknowledge a preference for avoidance of theft, killing, adultery and more; the rights and wrongs of these things involve context.
I have been in the military, both official and private. There is a high likelihood that in that employment, I brought about the deaths of innocent people. Does that make me the same as the BTK killer?
What if someone breaks into your home and after stealing everything he can find, asks you if you have a hidden safebox? What if he has no way of knowing if you lied or not, but if you tell the truth you will likely have an uninsured loss of thousands of dollars. I'll grant you, lying is wrong. But is it wrong to lie to the robber?
Why would we understand that sometimes theft is preferable, lying is good or homicide is justifiable ... while drawing such a hard line on adultery?
You make it sound like it is oh so simple.
Have you ever read the statistics on the odds of harm to children growing up without a father in the home? Have you ever discovered that in cases where the father tries to secure any form of physical custody outside of 1/7th visitation he loses 90% of the time?
Hey, sometimes some kids would be better off if their fathers were dead. But lets skip all that and cut to the chase. In MOST cases kids are better off with PRESENT fathers. Look up the statistics and see that it makes a difference in everything from rates of teen pregnancy to drug use to trouble with the law.
So a guy's wife who is otherwise fine won't or can't lay him.
So he should leave if she won't deal with that? Let his kids get by on a 1/7th dad?
What about a case like mine where if I were to ditch my wife (who is, btw, a truly kind and wonderful woman), she would likely end up institutionalized by her family?
Should her penalty for failing to lay me be "One flew over the cookoos nest?"
You know, chastity is not a normal state of being for men. Look at how it has been working out for the Catholic Church even among dedicated and highly religiously trained men. It is an unrealistic expectation. Monogamy I think is realistic in many cases. But chastity goes so far against nature as to be seriously problematic.
I'm sorry, but I feel zero guilt about visiting with a professional 6-8 times a year. In a perfect world, I would rather avoid it. But the world is not perfect, I am not the second incarnation of Christ, and every so often I am gonna get laid.