Biden's racism woes.

you call the media fakers, but in truth, it's easy to mistake that those 2 Codgers Biden referenced were Republicans. so much has changed since those guys were Members of Congress, you know that.. I told you earlier in this thread. in fact, things changed fast.. Trent Lott, Jesse Helms.. the move from the 70's to the 90's was the Generational move that switched Racist Lawmakers to the Republican side of the aisle.

why not admit that? you guys go back 150 years, and champion Abe Lincoln as your Republican Civil Rights Model, LOL Originally Posted by Chung Tran

TR invited Booker T Washington to the White House for supper. Wilson had separate bathrooms built in federal government buildings for people of color.

you call the media fakers, but in truth, it's easy to mistake that those 2 Codgers Biden referenced were Republicans. so much has changed since those guys were Members of Congress, you know that.. I told you earlier in this thread. in fact, things changed fast.. Trent Lott, Jesse Helms.. the move from the 70's to the 90's was the Generational move that switched Racist Lawmakers to the Republican side of the aisle.

why not admit that? you guys go back 150 years, and champion Abe Lincoln as your Republican Civil Rights Model, LOL Originally Posted by Chung Tran

+1

Good points Tran. The dixiecrats were democrats in name only. Many of them switched to the Republican party, like Strum Thurman who swithched to the Republican party in 1964.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

you call the media fakers, but in truth, it's easy to mistake that those 2 Codgers Biden referenced were Republicans. so much has changed since those guys were Members of Congress, you know that.. I told you earlier in this thread. in fact, things changed fast.. Trent Lott, Jesse Helms.. the move from the 70's to the 90's was the Generational move that switched Racist Lawmakers to the Republican side of the aisle.

why not admit that? you guys go back 150 years, and champion Abe Lincoln as your Republican Civil Rights Model, LOL Originally Posted by Chung Tran

+1

Good points Tran. The dixiecrats were democrats in name only. Many of them switched to the Republican party, like Strum Thurman who swithched to the Republican party in 1964.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond Originally Posted by adav8s28

no they didn't. yet another classic example of revisionist history and urban myth. this has been debunked in this forum ... many times.

do your homework, boys. there's a pop quiz next week.


https://freedomsjournalinstitute.org...s-and-the-gop/


Conclusion

While the notion that Dixiecrats all became Republicans is nothing more than another in a line of dubious urban legends; it’s clear that for generations its stories have been told (and retold) to manipulate and discourage Blacks from considering the Republican Party and, or more importantly, the tenets of conservative ideas. Unfortunately, the references made to State’s Rights commonly attributed to conservative ideology are still being widely used to link conservatives with segregationists. This, too, is nothing more than an urban legend. Sadly, these live on to smear and misrepresent not only our history but also the character and reputation of men and women of principle.


by the way .. meet the author of this "slanderous libel" ...





Dr. Wallace is the Publisher of Freedom's Journal Magazine. He has been in publishing for over 20 years and in ministry over 40 years. He holds a PhD in Biblical studies and is an ordained minister. He also serves as the President & Co-founder of Freedom's Journal Institute, the parent company of this magazine. He is married to Jennifer Wallace and they have two sons Eric and Greg.


thank you valued posters!!

no they didn't. yet another classic example of revisionist history and urban myth. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

No revisionist history, no myth. Many dixiecrats became republicans because the democrats became more liberal over time and the republican party became more conservative.

From the link:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, ultimately signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat, was filibustered by Democratic Senator and former KKK member Robert Byrd which led many Southern Democrats to vote for Barry Goldwater at the national level. In the ensuing years, with the passing of the Civil Rights Act and the increasing conservatism of the Republican Party compared to the liberalism of the Democratic Party (especially on social and cultural issues) led many more southern Democrats in the South to vote Republican. However, many continued to vote for Democrats at the state and local levels, especially before 1994. After 2010, Republicans had gained a solid advantage over Democrats at all levels of politics in most Southern states.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Democrats

No revisionist history, no myth. Many dixiecrats became republicans because the democrats became more liberal over time and the republican party became more conservative.

From the link:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, ultimately signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat, was filibustered by Democratic Senator and former KKK member Robert Byrd which led many Southern Democrats to vote for Barry Goldwater at the national level. In the ensuing years, with the passing of the Civil Rights Act and the increasing conservatism of the Republican Party compared to the liberalism of the Democratic Party (especially on social and cultural issues) led many more southern Democrats in the South to vote Republican. However, many continued to vote for Democrats at the state and local levels, especially before 1994. After 2010, Republicans had gained a solid advantage over Democrats at all levels of politics in most Southern states.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Democrats Originally Posted by adav8s28

only three did.

Some southern Democrats became Republicans at the national level, while remaining with their old party in state and local politics throughout the 1970s and 1980s. Of the known Dixiecrats, only three switched parties becoming Republicans: Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms and Mills E. Godwin, Jr.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Democrats


Websters does not define "three" as "many"


man·y

/ˈmenē/ Learn to pronounce




determiner, pronoun, & adjective
determiner: many; pronoun: many; adjective: many; comparative adjective: more; superlative adjective: most

1. 1.
   a large number of.
   "many people agreed with her"
   synonyms:numerous, a great/good deal of, a lot of, a large/great number of, great quantities of, plenty of, countless, innumerable, scores of, crowds of, droves of, an army of, a horde of, a multitude of, a multiplicity of, multitudinous, numberless, multiple, untold; Moreseveral, various, sundry, diverse, assorted, multifarious;
   copious, abundant, profuse, an abundance of, a profusion of;
   frequent;
   informallots of, umpteen, eleventy, loads of, masses of, stacks of, scads of, heaps of, piles of, bags of, tons of, oodles of, dozens of, hundreds of, thousands of, millions of, billions of, zillions of, more … than one can shake a stick at;
   informalshedload;
   informala slew of, gazillions of, bazillions of, gobs of;
   informala swag of;
   vulgar slanga shitload of;
   literarymyriad, divers
   "he has many faults"
   
   antonyms:f

noun
plural noun: many

1.
the majority of people.
"music for the many"


synonyms:the people, the common people, the masses, the multitude, the majority, the populace, the public, the rank and file, the crowd, the commonalty, the commonality;




thank you valued poster!

only three did. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

I am talking about registered voters, not the people elected into office.

I am talking about registered voters, not the people elected into office. Originally Posted by adav8s28

that took time and was not immediate. it was generational.

that took time and was not immediate. it was generational. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Yes, and largely after segregation was not the problem that it was. But it's appears to be the sole issue the left can try and hang it's hat on as to why the South continues to embrace conservative values. But for them all conservatives are racists so there is no other explanation.

I am talking about registered voters, not the people elected into office. Originally Posted by adav8s28

No, you weren't. see below.

+1

Good points Tran. The dixiecrats were democrats in name only. Many of them switched to the Republican party, like Strum Thurman who swithched to the Republican party in 1964.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond Originally Posted by adav8s28

No, you weren't. see below. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Yes, I was see post #19.

https://www.eccie.net/newreply.php?d...y&p=1061576184

that took time and was not immediate. it was generational. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Maybe so. However, Trans point is still valid. The republican party of today is not the republican party of Lincoln.

Maybe so. However, Trans point is still valid. The republican party of today is not the republican party of Lincoln. Originally Posted by adav8s28

and what is today's Democratic party? other than a bunch of snowflakes who want free everything i mean?

Maybe so. However, Trans point is still valid. The republican party of today is not the republican party of Lincoln. Originally Posted by adav8s28

actually it still is. too many Progressives pretending to be conservatives in the Repuke party.

actually it still is. too many Progressives pretending to be conservatives in the Repuke party. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

The republican party of Lincoln did not have any dixiecrats like Strom Thurman in it. Thurman was the former dixiecrat turned republican who filibustered the LBJ's civil rights legislation. This was after he had a child with a black woman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond