Trenchant observation as always, EW!
I hadn't thought about whether gay men see TS women or not. I guess it makes sense that if they are attracted to male body types, that they might not be attracted to XY females.
Do others on here agree with EW's interesting opinion that seeing TS women is a straight thing?
Do men who see TS women also typically play with genetic women?
Isn't sexuality fun and interesting??? Originally Posted by spice-is-nice
I'm puzzled. And with no intent whatsoever of perpetuating offensive stereotypes, I really don't understand the concept of "transexual female". Is that a female who would present herself as more "male" or "butch" (no offense intended!!!)? Originally Posted by the pragmatistwhen speaking to or about a trans person, it is correct and respectful to address them as their portrayed gender, such as a male to female, is a born male becoming a woman, thus female transsexual or female transgender. And the same vice versa, a woman becoming a man, is a male transsexual or male transgender.
I agree 90% with EW... my 10% reservation is that a TS could be a trail head down a path that leads to man on man encounters. Originally Posted by DallasPlanoGuy
So, you're saying a tranny cock is a gateway cock? (Or should that be gay-teway cock?)Smart ass!
I'm sure it's a slippery slope, especially with all that lube. Originally Posted by lizardking
Smart ass!yes, it is due to the amount of hormones we take. Presently I am on a reduced dose, so I get fully erect, they also cause loss of sensitivity and loss of ejaculate. On my full dose I do still orgasm, but its not as fullfilling
One thing that I've noticed, personally, is men who like to dress up generally are heterosexual for the most part, or sometimes, heteroflexible . They might like to have dealings with a penis, smile, but that's not their general direction.
Of course, this is a huge generalization!
I do know that some female transexuals often have problems with erections. Possibly do to medications? I'm not sure.
But I'm with Spice, part of My fantasy is her having a hard dick. Period. (I'm so obviously biased with that desire, aren't I?) Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers
Lokk, talk is cheap. I've never been with a TS, so who am I to boast. But, if you think you are willing to play in a 3-sum, (and I mean PLAY in a 3-sum) what's the problem?I think ANYONE with that kind of biased attitude is in the WRONG line of work honestly, I mean seriously, not only does that attitude loose u potential clients, it also shows how closed minded u are, what kind of "hobbyist" wants to be judged for their desires.....
Look, it comes down to this. Just because we're will(en)/interested in doing "X"), doesn't say anything about our enjoyment of "Y" ("Y" being defined as something more vanilla.)
That having been said, be aware of potential costs. I had an SA provider, whom I seen repeatedly, including at the very outset of her hobby life, drop me when she read I'd been in an MFM scene (assumimg there was MM contact.)
Since then I've done stuff betond the 'norm' for our hobby world. After that, I've done, and completely enjoyed, scenes I'm sure almost no one on the board would object to.
"Vive la differance", say I. [I.e. Do your own thing, baby."] Originally Posted by Willen