Yes, the “blue dress” analogy” was coined by Levin. I was passing it along to the Lefties, the ones that are around anyways. Consider it a PSA for the uninformed. Originally Posted by bambinoStill waiting on this grandiose revelation Bina. I'm tuned in. So far, only the current president has proven HIMSELF to be the most corrupt in modern history. Since Tricky Dicky.
Still waiting on this grandiose revelation Bina. I'm tuned in. So far, only the current president has proven HIMSELF to be the most corrupt in modern history. Since Tricky Dicky.I guess you haven’t been paying attention. No surprise. It’s obvious already. But it will be indisputable pretty soon. Have another cocktail.
I guess you haven’t been paying attention. No surprise. It’s obvious already. But it will be indisputable pretty soon. Have another cocktail. Originally Posted by bambinoI'm having a six pack. Are you having a conniption? Obvious? I'm tuned in here. Out with it! What is so obvious of the previous administration's corruption? You just feeling a vaginal itch? Your pussy soar? I don't give credence to far right-wing conspiracies. Not even far right-wing "evidence". So . . . where's the "dress"?
I'm having a six pack. Are you having a conniption? Obvious? I'm tuned in here. Out with it! What is so obvious of the previous administration's corruption? You just feeling a vaginal itch? Your pussy soar? I don't give credence to far right-wing conspiracies. Not even far right-wing "evidence". So . . . where's the "dress"?6 pack? Pabst Blue Ribbon? Malt liquor? Sally Yates was shocked when she learned Obama knew about it.,Obama ordered this farce, he knew about it. Stay tuned Lumpy. The train is rolling down the tracks.
This leftie . . .
is calling your bluff. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
What is so obvious of the previous administration's corruption?
The problem is, your problem is, you don't want to hear the evidence. What is obvious is that you are incapable of deviation from what you want so desperately to be true that even evidence wouldn't dissuade you and that is sad. You want evidence? Read the recently released 57 transcripts that Schiff based his assertion that he has seen the evidence of Russian collusion. There was none. Not one single person provided a shread of evidence! Not Clapper who is still on MSNBC saying he still isn't sure Trump isn't a Russian asset. Well, he sure wasn't singing that tune when he was under oath and asked if he had any such evidence to which he replied NOPE!
Read the recently released FBI documents. If you had any interest at all in "the evidence" you would go look for it since some of it, more to come, is now in plain view for anybody with an interest in reading it but like I said, you have no such interest.
So . . . where's the "dress"? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
It's called metaphor! Originally Posted by HedonistForeverI know what a metaphor is, man. That's why I put it in quotes. Sir.
On balance, should people welcome his influence in the Trump era?
Yes, said The Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan, who in March described with relief how Carlson had “admirably” intervened to convince Trump of the gravity of the coronavirus.
No, said The New York Times’ Frank Bruni, who believes Carlson’s well-placed warnings about military conflict against Iran don’t compensate for the “ugliness” of his views on immigrants or his “on-air rant” against billionaire Paul Singer.
I know what a metaphor is, man. That's why I put it in quotes. Sir.Nobody gives a fuck.
The following piece is an exercise in imagined online journalism class over video conferencing. Enjoy.
Oh. FOX. Right. Sure.
Why Are Writers and Editors So Obsessed With Tucker Carlson?
https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...ltitude-257560
Bombshell anyone?
No? Okay. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
