How many permanent jobs? I've read up to as many as THIRTY FIVE Originally Posted by WTF
There may not be very many permanent jobs. I don't know,don't care.So what you're saying is that we should focus oil production on domestic sources, so we can raise more money to wage war in the Middle East.
If people lied. they lied. It would not be a first for either side. Agreed, the lying needs to stop. It is wrong, but it will go on.
What there will be is alot of construction jobs in the short run and a helluva lot of oil in the long run. That's what is important to our national security and will help further our independence from the Middle Eastern fields. Every dollar we send to them for oil could be used to fund terror against us and our allies. Originally Posted by rioseco
They aren't all lies. Obamacare is failing, NASA did fake numbers on global warming, and Keystone will create thousands of jobs. Not sure about the rest, but the source is not known for objectivity. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuylet's prove these things beyond your say so, Whiny. an
So what you're saying is that we should focus oil production on domestic sources, so we can raise more money to wage ware in the Middle East.Don't know what "wares" we wage in the Middle East, but developing resources and providing for the reliable and cost effective means to transport those resources domestically will give us a greater "bargaining chip" with regard to conditions in the Middle East........and we will not have to "protect" the developed resources in the Middle East (or anyone where else in the World) to feed the addiction for oil in this country.
Makes perfect sense.
And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously, even I. Your own circus tent? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
l...why not rebut the story with something from a real reliable source, l..... Originally Posted by Yssup RiderHow the fuck would you know what's "reliable" ???.....
Don't know what "wares" we wage in the Middle East, but developing resources and providing for the reliable and cost effective means to transport those resources domestically will give us a greater "bargaining chip" with regard to conditions in the Middle East........and we will not have to "protect" the developed resources in the Middle East (or anyone where else in the World) to feed the addiction for oil in this country.
So, your dumbass remark DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE, ..
..... much less "perfect sense."
BTW: Apparently Exxon agrees with "investing in America"!
"And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously,....." Originally Posted by LexusLover
So that's what rioseco's tongue tied blurtation meant to you, LLIdiot? it isn't what he said, which of course comes as no surprise. That you read anything into it is amazing, though your conclusion was complexly predictable.Complexly predictable?
Maybe you need to give poor rio some lessons in English, Mr. Five ellipses! You seem to be the expert around here, O Prince of Punctuation.
Oh the irony.
(btw - your first reply was so lame, you had to immediately back it up with an attack to take some of the sting off of the stupidity you showed in the first one, eh, LLIdiot? Again, typical.) Originally Posted by Yssup Rider