There ain't no point, Erickson. I'm simply trying to illuminate the terrain in which we currently find ourselves deployed. You don't mind that, do you? And if you do, . . . .
You on my frequency?!
(What comes first? The question or exclamation mark?)
WTF does that have to do with the topic of this thread...
Sober up and read the thread again...
Why don't you tell us more about that investigation...that is when you sober upOriginally Posted by bb1961
Begin the Jan. 6 investigation — now
https://www.timesrepublican.com/opin...stigation-now/
Like many Americans, the president expressed his preference for an independent bipartisan commission to conduct that investigation. But that path was closed last month when Senate Republicans killed the Jan. 6 commission bill. They did so at the bidding of Donald Trump and of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who articulated one of their more absurd arguments against the commission.
“I think we will know everything we need to know. We were all witnesses,” he said. “We were right there when it happened and I simply think the commission is not necessary.” When a shattering crime occurs and a major witness then insists that an investigation is “not necessary,” suspicion immediately arises concerning that person’s consciousness of guilt. McConnell has aimed to prevent or discredit an investigation of Jan. 6 not because we “know everything we need to know,” but because he’s scared to death of what we will learn. On Trump’s orders, the minority leader instructed his caucus to vote down the commission, its pre-midterm deadline and a host of other features demanded by House Republicans.
I am sober. And don't call me Shirley.
Ted Cruz, Kevin McCarthy et alia don't want an investigation to expose their complicity in the deadly attack on our Capitol.
But will move political mountains to drag an investigation into what was not an unusual occurrence just to score points in the midterms. That's how I can tie this to the topic. Get it now?
