That was careless of Sherry, but I don't think it was malicious. Sherry was very sweet and determined to help SND when I brought her some money for her. She asked me if I was interested in running a Sunday special as well.
Maybe Sherry did suck six dicks that day and only gave you the money for three but that's still three dicks she sucked and gave you the money for. If you are hurting so bad that's a pretty kind gesture, especially for a hooker. I wouldn't turn down $150/week if I couldn't pay my bills.
Personally, I think Sherry may have gotten some things mixed up by accident. I also think she posted the name by accident since she copies and pastes a lot of her stuff rather than retyping it. She sent me the pm as well. I already knew the first name though from SDN herself so I didn't think anything of it since I figured Sherry would too. Point being, I think she did that by accident too. Without disrespecting anyone, I think Sherry made a mistake. Maybe it's for the best though since she's not being careful with certain info.
In any case, I think her heart was in the right place and I can imagine she's pretty torn up over all this. She seems like a sincere older lady just wanting to help. My personal feeling is that she got a little mixed up with things. Who knows though. They've got some amazing actors on this board so you never know.
Originally Posted by thathottnurse
Don't take this as me defending anyone but are you basing this on what's presented here? When it comes to SHMB drama I believe less than half of what i read.
Now in regards to closing threads, well...
#22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.