Another conspiracy theory proven to be true.

It's obvious you haven't read his deposition. He is being deposed about an open investigation. The notes and what he can say is very limited. The notes you're talking about can't be used because of the information is about the active investigation. If you saw the questions they were asking, it didn't matter that he couldn't answer them and it didn't matter matter to the committee either.

Any other questions that would have been answered for you if you had read the deposition?
Oh,right. You didn't read it.

Imagine you thinking that there might be a reason that information like that can't revealed.
I can't imagine you thinking that far in advanced.

1/4 of the deposition is them arguing about what can be said and what can't.
Too bad you didn't read the 2 pages you sent with your email.
It's mostly arguments about what
what can be be said.

Oh, he answered all of their questions without shooting himself in the foot.

LOL imagine you thinking there are no such things as notes that follow such calls. The entire justice system runs on people memories... Originally Posted by texassapper

Perhaps the post should be titled Another conspiracy theory proven to be a conspiracy theory.

... And that's how it will be Next Year. ...

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Shouldn't matter what year.
You should have no qualms with current Fed doing it.
Justice is blind. Well, it's suppose to be even though one politial party loaded the SC.