White People Deserve Reparations

... We Salts go all the way back to BC times and what-not.

Don't forget that fellow Lot had his wife changed into
a pillar of SALT. ... Sayes-so right in the Bible books.

And THAT was even before Iodized Salt. ... just sayin'

... How 'bout NO reparations for anybody. Make yer-own way.

#### Salty

Turned into a Saltlick, you say?

... Too right, mate... Lot's wife... Right there in the Bible!
... Hmmmmm.... Can onley remember some o' me schoolin'...
That fellow - Lot - may have ran the local gambelin'
establishment - surely owned by Sodam And Gamorra.

Maybe you fellows are right - and casino reparations
would be a wrong-headed idea. ... Kinda be FUN, though...

#### Salty

The only folks that deserve reparations are the indigenous native americans. Originally Posted by winn dixie

Yeh, especially the Aztecs and Comanches, who never met another Native American they didn’t want to kill.

Yeh, especially the Aztecs and Comanches, who never met another Native American they didn’t want to kill. Originally Posted by Jackie S

exactly. most woke leftists want to make it look like evil whitey is to blame when in fact native american Indians (who actually migrated from Siberia making them RUSSIANS bahahaa) were peaceful when in fact most were very militant and territorial and not just to them evil whiteys but other tribes.

exactly. most woke leftists want to make it look like evil whitey is to blame when in fact native american Indians (who actually migrated from Siberia making them RUSSIANS bahahaa) were peaceful when in fact most were very militant and territorial and not just to them evil whiteys but other tribes. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So, you have any DNA comparisons from Native American Indians and Siberians? *I* don't follow the 23 and me stuff but never heard any genetic makeup of these two groups.

So, you have any DNA comparisons from Native American Indians and Siberians? *I* don't follow the 23 and me stuff but never heard any genetic makeup of these two groups. Originally Posted by Precious_b

yes


https://www.science.org/content/arti...genomes-reveal

https://www.science.org/content/arti...-found-siberia



thank you precious poster

Interesting.
I thought they would have something showing percentage of matching traits or something.

most woke leftists want to make it look like evil whitey is to blame when in fact native american Indians (who actually migrated from Siberia making them RUSSIANS bahahaa) were peaceful when in fact most were very militant and territorial and not just to them evil whiteys but other tribes. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So, you have any DNA comparisons from Native American Indians and Siberians? *I* don't follow the 23 and me stuff but never heard any genetic makeup of these two groups. Originally Posted by Precious_b

yes


https://www.science.org/content/arti...genomes-reveal

https://www.science.org/content/arti...-found-siberia



thank you precious poster Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Interesting.
I thought they would have something showing percentage of matching traits or something. Originally Posted by Precious_b

i'm a direct descendant of a known indentured servant, that might be worth something

and the word slave is derived from the slav peoples, who are white, you know the women have high cheek bones, or at least the younger ones do have them, not sure what happens when those women get old, the old ones are known as babushkas..mr. wunnerful's. that is lawrence welk's family, emigrated from odessa russia, they spent their first winter in north dakota living under an upturned wagon

oh yeah and the irish, im part irish, slaves of a sort to the english, who lived in mud huts and worked for subsistence or at times below subsistence

but you know, at some point you have to move along Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

babushka, they get fat and have big boobs as they get older.


there are some babushkas who are the exception.

That’s right. The Egyptians enslaved Jews(also white people.) The Barbary pirates enslaved white Europeans that were captured from ships they conquered. The Moors enslaved white people from lands they conquered. The Romans enslaved all white people who weren’t Roman. The Romans even made white folks fight for free in coliseums for their entertainment. After the fight they went back to their slave routine, if they survived. Shouldn’t we be entitled to reparations?

https://babylonbee.com/news/everyone...-at-some-point Originally Posted by Cheap Charlie

theres some disagreement on whether Jews were actually enslaved by Egyptians.


the consensus by historians was that the Jews/Hebrews were guest workers who migrated to the Nile Delta where they settled. they were a rough equivalent to the Jannisaries of Turkey. they got paid for their services, so how could they be slaves? its more likely that the population were "contract" workers; indentured as per the agreement between the egyptian king and the leaders of the jewish population.


Moses broke that contract.

...there are some babushkas who are the exception. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

You mean like Raquel "Hubba-Hubba" Welch-Babushka?

Okay, the topic is reparations. In general, reparations are paid to the victims of a crime. Let me say that again, the VICTIMS of a crime. Not their descendants, their friends, or business partners. Only the victims qualify in the courtroom. Now, you can make a case that the children of a victim could be disenfranchised by the loss suffered by the family in property or lives. Such as...the family land was stolen, and it took 40 years to get it back or the father being killed by a murderer injured the minor children. We're not talking about children or even grandchildren. To go right to the problem, we're talking about a so-called aggrieved group upset about the historical institution of slavery in the UNITED STATES. Funny they don't talk about the rest of the world, just the USA. I guess you always go with the deep pockets and stupid, soft-headed liberals.

Slavery in the USA and reparations...first I have to point out that prior to 1781 we're talking about England. There was no USA before that. The institution of slavery was ended officially in 1865. So, legally, we're talking about those 84 years between the two dates. So, anyone whose family came to this country after 1865 gets NOTHING. Anyone whose ancestors gained their freedom before 1781 has to go to England, France, or Spain for restitution. This is not to say that people were not poorly treated before and after the founding of the US, but it is not SLAVERY. You need to take it up with the states, the cities, and the descendants of those who profited.

Okay, we've established our grievance group. Who qualifies? Should Oprah qualify? Michael Jordan? One can argue that their circumstances are far better off than if their families had stayed in their original countries. Kind of like a swindler who sells you worthless property only to discover oil on the property. You can hold a grudge against the swindler or you can enjoy your new car and house.

I'll end this one here as it is getting long and I'm sure that the logic is taxing to some readers here. I will leave you with this one little nugget, Africans were not the only people enslaved and brought to the new world.

theres some disagreement on whether Jews were actually enslaved by Egyptians.


the consensus by historians was that the Jews/Hebrews were guest workers who migrated to the Nile Delta where they settled. they were a rough equivalent to the Jannisaries of Turkey. they got paid for their services, so how could they be slaves? its more likely that the population were "contract" workers; indentured as per the agreement between the egyptian king and the leaders of the jewish population.


Moses broke that contract. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

You mean like Raquel "Hubba-Hubba" Welch-Babushka? Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Rachel is not Russian.