I find the feedback from this post and from my review as "interesting" and "frustrating" as the actual experience.
Like many, if not most, of the men here, I have a list of providers a mile long that I want to get to. I spend a lot of time and research before I make a date to try to avoid disappointments like this. For Kylee she has over 40 reviews since 2013, all a resounding "yes".
I hesitated writing my review because I really don't want to hurt anyone out there. But after posting a comment to another persons review I got two PM's saying she fell asleep on them. So I decided a review needed to be written. And now so many have come out and it appears this has been a problem for the last three years that has happened to numerous guys out there. Really!
This has changed my opinion of reviews here and I would encourage everyone to rethink your approach to reviews. Be honest. Good or bad, let the rest of us know what happened in your time with this lady. Then leave it to each Hobbiest to make up his own mind if he takes a gamble or not. But you all could have saved me a lot of aggravation, not to mention the missed opportunity of being with one of the other ladies on my "list" if just one or two of you had mentioned the fact that this lovely lady has a tendency to pass out in her sessions.
Just sayin.
Originally Posted by Gbfsl
God bless you sir! However, I find it all too common that this is the case. One hobbyist speaks up on an issue then they get subsequent confirmations from additional hobbyists only "after" said hobbyist raises said issue.
I think it is due to the fear of some provider's influence (as in the provider's ability to "black ball" someone with other provider's, mods, or admins). I don't care how many provider's there are in the metroplex, we as men do not like our options limited in any way, lol! Think about it, how many "NBA" threads have you observed since being here.
This could also be due to the fact that most of us are nice guys and don't want to feel like we are "hurting" the provider's business. This makes sense because, let's face it, this is a portion of these ladies livelihood. But are we really helping when we neglect to point out obvious flaws in the service provided? As I am in the line of work of pointing out flaws in controls and processes, I know all to well that these actions would not make one a very popular and/or "likeable" person. However, I have seen where these actions do help because it gives the line of business (provider) insight into how they can improve their processes and become more efficient and profitable.
On a hooker board/social site, where "everyone's" voice is heard, these things just come with the territory. It's unfortunate really because it only serves to complicate things and it promotes a very "club oriented" atmosphere at times. Although, it has it's benefits as well.
Just my one cent, but, before I digress, I want to say I could be absolutely wrong and not know what the hell I'm talking about.
Hobby on good sir!!!