WHO Proposals Could Strip Nations of Their Sovereignty

I LOVE source... Originally Posted by Precious_b

I take it that Dr Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. who has a Ph.D. in Media Studies from The University of Texas, a BA in Political Science and a BA & Masters in Public Policy interviewed Dr. Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D. who is purportedly a bioweapons expert and professor of international law at the University of Illinois and had it published would constitute shady and unqualified in your biased fact-checkers opinion. Please tell me they aren't the pole dancers at Snopes. Please, oh please.

Sure... they can't possibly hold a candle to our very own Luca McStain, but uhmm... what does count as qualified in your fact checkers opinion bias?

... published would constitute shady and unqualified ... Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

What academic journal of his peers would said publication be?

I like it. But rest assured, if I'm not being a pain in the keester here, it's only because I'm being a pain in the keester elsewhere If we've learned anything from the Twitter files releases - censorship is tyranny. But the thing that chaps my hide is that this is not new news. The Founders, albeit because of initial rejection of the Constitution by the masses, knew enough to call it out as item #1 in the Bill of Rights.
All I'm driving at is: If your biases are based in an environment of tyranny, aka censorship, how much confidence can one have in the quality of ones bias? Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

You like what?

With the twitter dump, I have to admit I have not read anything on it. What keeps me from being curious about it is that twitter is now a private company and I wouldn't trust the spin one person can put on what they put out.
Not saying what they've put out is tainted, just that the king of twit can deem what they want to present. That certainly invites a narrow bias.

Sovereignty is given by be able to control a area not Who not the UN notNATO, not the CSS, NOT OPEC,

What academic journal of his peers would said publication be? Originally Posted by Precious_b

Not sure what you are driving at here. Help me, help you, bridge this language barrier. Do you have a recommended language learning tool for Idiot Savant? I don't see it as a supported language in Babble or DuoLingo?

Or are you to trying to discern whether I have a pocket copy of the US Constitution (Why_Yes_I_Do) and whether the phrase 'peer reviewed' shows up in it or in the 1st Amendment? (Why_No_It_Doesn't)

Wait...wait... Let me ask this last question 1st: Have you taken a PCR test for Covid anytime in the last couple years?

... I wouldn't trust the spin one person can put on what they put out.
Not saying what they've put out is tainted, just that the king of twit can deem what they want to present. That certainly invites a narrow bias. Originally Posted by Precious_b

Seems like the long form version of what I said previously: Censorship = Tyranny, except that you take as gospel, written on stone tablets, anything the government puts out, so long as their Ministry of Truth approves it.

Not sure what you are driving at here. Help me, help you, bridge this language barrier. Do you have a recommended language learning tool for Idiot Savant? I don't see it as a supported language in Babble or DuoLingo?

Or are you to trying to discern whether I have a pocket copy of the US Constitution (Why_Yes_I_Do) and whether the phrase 'peer reviewed' shows up in it or in the 1st Amendment? (Why_No_It_Doesn't)

Wait...wait... Let me ask this last question 1st: Have you taken a PCR test for Covid anytime in the last couple years?

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

I'd recommend you say that to yourself in front of a mirror since it is your quoted text that you make mention of documentation.

Seems like the long form version of what I said previously: Censorship = Tyranny, except that you take as gospel, written on stone tablets, anything the government puts out, so long as their Ministry of Truth approves it.

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Seeing the king twit is the private owner of said website, that would definitely lead to ease of censorship. Kinda hard to keep a lid on things when more people are involved.

But y'all like to treat secondhand stuff as gospel. That seems to be your MoT....until you let us know how you find the time to process quintillion bits of data a day. The day you show us that, *I* will stop believing that you use your secret bias site that isn't the paranoid voice in your head.

....until you let us know how you find the time to process quintillion bits of data a day. The day you show us that, *I* will stop believing... Originally Posted by Precious_b

30+ years of high level IT including but not limited to: large scale storage and systems management, Telephony systems management and massive scale database work and a chite-ton of other works, starting long before you even knew about the internets at all. Also, aggregator news sites, BBS and other boards. Side note, I was able to work with some dang fine PhD types along the way.

So... answer the fooking question: Approximately how many RT-PCR, aka rapid DNA, tests have you taken over the past couple years Sunshine?

Just because you are/were a traffic cop for electrons doesn't mean you inspected everything that flowed through those seven layers of protocal.

Get back to me when you take care of old bidness and prove you inspected everything. Not just give out hall passes on the old info highway.

Just because you are/were a traffic cop for electrons ... Originally Posted by Precious_b

So... answer the fooking question: Approximately how many RT-PCR, aka rapid DNA, tests have you taken over the past couple years Sunshine?

So... answer the fooking question: Approximately how many RT-PCR, aka rapid DNA, tests have you taken over the past couple years Sunshine? Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

...

Get back to me when you take care of old bidness and prove you inspected everything. ... Originally Posted by Precious_b

If you want people to interact with you, stop being pushy and we'll quid pro quo with you.

Checking back in with a source document of interest from the CDC. It is well over 200 pages long of ICD-10 codes and proposal discussions, along with just under a gorillion links to medical related document sources.

Helpful tip for known sufferers of TDS, TDS, Orange Man Bad, TDS, TDS: There may be helpful information for you about your affliction on Page 42 of the ICD-10 codes.

ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting

Contained in the CDC ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting Topic Packet September 14-15, 2021 on page 194:



Interesting reading about that meeting can be found in an article titled:
EXCLUSIVE: The Federal Government Is Tracking Unvaccinated People Who Go To The Doctor And To The Hospital Due to CDC-Designed Surveillance Program

However, it is not recommended reading for the TDS, TDS, Orange Man Bad, TDS, TDS crowd.

This is total bullshit.
The only thing threatening US sovereignty are the trumpys.
From the link below.


"The World Health Organization can make recommendations after the declaration of a global emergency, but it has no control over any nation’s decisions. Yet conservatives in the U.S. falsely claim that amendments proposed by the Biden administration to existing global health regulations, and a new WHO pandemic treaty, will threaten U.S. sovereignty."




https://www.factcheck.org/2022/05/sc...health-policy/