Almost 93 million Americans out of work...

What you are seeing is the result of 40-50 years of business trying to generate more profit with few employees. Originally Posted by BigLouie

OMG! What an anti-socialistic attitude? Increasing profits!!!!!

Let's see .... if we can produce the same amount of service or products with a smaller work force, that means that we have been paying for some nonproductive employees!!!! Cut the less/nonproductive employees and cut the "fat" from the overhead, which lowers costs and increases profit.

Cure: Earn the money you are paid.

OMG! What an anti-socialistic attitude? Increasing profits!!!!!

Let's see .... if we can produce the same amount of service or products with a smaller work force, that means that we have been paying for some nonproductive employees!!!! Cut the less/nonproductive employees and cut the "fat" from the overhead, which lowers costs and increases profit.

Cure: Earn the money you are paid. Originally Posted by LexusLover

And then the Idiot Klan, errr Clan can bitch and moan endlessly about Obama being at fault because the employer's are forced to lay off employee's in order to increase their profit margin.

What you are seeing is the result of 40-50 years of business trying to generate more profit with few employees. That is what the whole TQM movement is about. Better quality with less people means more profit. I use to have a neighbor what worked for a firm that location oil rigs with radio location. There was an entire industry with a large number of employees. When GPS locators became commercially available that entire industry ceased to exist in a single day. At my company we calculated that we could double our sales and not have to add a single person. This is how you have companies with record profits and 10% of the population not able to find work. Nothing any president can do about it. Originally Posted by BigLouie

Exactly. Unless of course you want the government to put its hand even further up private business' ass. Which I'm sure these mouthbreathers would be dead set against. All about the Benjamins baby!

You can't have it both ways, idiots.

OMG! What an anti-socialistic attitude? Increasing profits!!!!!

Let's see .... if we can produce the same amount of service or products with a smaller work force, that means that we have been paying for some nonproductive employees!!!! Cut the less/nonproductive employees and cut the "fat" from the overhead, which lowers costs and increases profit.

Cure: Earn the money you are paid. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You can't even read you frittata. Technology is what did it. They weren't paying nonproductive employees you shit stain, until commercially available GPS came out. THEN they addressed the problem.

And then the Idiot Klan, errr Clan can bitch and moan endlessly about Obama being at fault because the employer's are forced to lay off employee's in order to increase their profit margin. Originally Posted by bigtex

Nooooo!

I never said "employer's (sic) are forced to lay off employee's (sic)"!

I studied English when I was in college, and I only took some post-graduate courses at U of H...... in English : Perhaps you should have taken more English courses, at least one or two, instead of majoring in Stalking. You're not setting a very good example for your lap dog, Shammmoooooo!

Nooooo!

I never said "employer's (sic) are forded to lay off employee's (sic)"!

I studied English when I was in college, and I only took some post-graduate courses at U of H...... in English : Perhaps you should have taken more English courses, at least one or two, instead of majoring in Stalking. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Oh, I get it now!

Repeatedly calling out LLIdiot for his stupid, repetitive, ridiculous, condescending, egotistical and pompous posts is now considered "Stalking".

Only in Idiotville!

Nooooo!

I never said "employer's (sic) are forced to lay off employee's (sic)"!

I studied English when I was in college, and I only took some post-graduate courses at U of H...... in English : Perhaps you should have taken more English courses, at least one or two, instead of majoring in Stalking. You're not setting a very good example for your lap dog, Shammmoooooo! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Should've really concentrated on reading. That's where you suck.

You can't even read you frittata. Technology is what did it. They weren't paying nonproductive employees you shit stain, until commercially available GPS came out. THEN they addressed the problem. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

Obviously you don't interview, hire, or fire. Neither do you listen to other employers. Increasing technology doesn't eliminate the jobs ... the lack of production compels those who think outside of the box to design AND MANUFACTURE a machine that doesn't take sick leave at the drop of a hat, play video games and shop on the work computer, and pretend to be working everytime the boss or a supervisor walks by, or is talking/chatting/communicating with friends on their phones or "social media"!

Also, unions trying to drive up wages by striking and picketing entice employers into replace workers with "technology"!

Now, who designs, manufacturers, distributes, sells, installs, services, and repairs the "technology" and who designs, manufacturers, distributes, sells, installs, services, and replaces parts on the "technology."

Or do you just like picking cotton?

Should've really concentrated on reading. That's where you suck. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

I'm not concerned at all about my reading skills.

I'm sure there are a lot of high quality plumbers who prefer not to dig through shit, ....

... unless it is absolutely necessary for the repair of the plumbing!

Your's doesn't need much reading.

I'm not interested in the "communistic" take on "work force development"...

... that's been tried and didn't work out well.

Oh, I get it now!

Calling out LLIdiot for his stupid, repetitive, ridiculous, condescending, egotistical and pompous posts is now considered "Stalking".

Only in Idiotville! Originally Posted by bigtex

And you prove my point!

(Notice you didn't deny majoring in Stalking at U of H.)

Obviously you don't interview, hire, or fire. Neither do you listen to other employers. Increasing technology doesn't eliminate the jobs ... the lack of production compels those who think outside of the box to design AND MANUFACTURE a machine that doesn't take sick leave at the drop of a hat, play video games and shop on the work computer, and pretend to be working everytime the boss or a supervisor walks by, or is talking/chatting/communicating with friends on their phones or "social media"!

Also, unions trying to drive up wages by striking and picketing entice employers into replace workers with "technology"!

Now, who designs, manufacturers, distributes, sells, installs, services, and repairs the "technology" and who designs, manufacturers, distributes, sells, installs, services, and replaces parts on the "technology."

Or do you just like picking cotton? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Increasing technology doesn't eliminate jobs?? You must be kidding. Jesus Christ. I can't even respond to something that stupid. You make this shit too easy. Technology doesn't eliminate jobs? I've heard it all now.

http://time.com/84780/technology-is-...jobs-obsolete/

http://www.ibtimes.com/technology-ra...eports-1164631

http://www.technologyreview.com/feat...stroying-jobs/

almost 93 million americans arent working..that's a true number..not sure if the term "out of work" should be used to describe them, as that term indicates they are wanting to work, that number has already been adjusted for subtracting those looking for work

"92,898,000 Americans were not in the labor force in February, according to data released from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Friday."

the labor force participation rate is calculated by the use of non-institutionalized, non-military over 16 population

Please notice the almost 93 million americans not working does not include those working or actively looking for work

the 93 million are largely Obama butt sitters

its the lowest labor participation rate since 1978 (carter)



http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-...-low-11-months

almost 93 million americans arent working..that's a true number..not sure if the term "out of work" should be used to describe them, as that term indicates they are wanting to work, that number has already been adjusted for those looking for work

"92,898,000 Americans were not in the labor force in February, according to data released from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Friday."

the labor force participation rate is calculated by the use of non-institutionalized, non-military over 16 population

Please notice the almost 93 million americans not working does not include those working or actively looking for work

the 93 million are largely Obama butt sitters

its the lowest labor participation rate since 1978 (carter)



http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-...-low-11-months Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

The 93 million not working DOESN'T inlcude those working? Yeah, no shit, sherlock. They aren't out of work. Anyone over 16? What about those who are retired?

This thread is about "Obie" ... isn't it?

#1: It's "Obie's" administration reporting the stats.
#2: The "Obie" apologists are constantly touting the "improving economy"!

Hide and watch. The lights haven't turned on yet.

This shit makes the front page, and the corrections are back with the funnies.

I forget to mention in my list ...

DOJ report that there was no evidence Michael Brown's shooting was racially motivated.

(I heard the "Law Professor" in Chief mouthing off about Wilson is entitled to the "presumption of innocence" (my words). He was ALWAYS ENTITLED TO THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE ...... more egg on his face and he wants to tout the lowered "unemployment rate"!) Originally Posted by LexusLover

There is something germane to the OP Michael Brown, thanks lexie lacking . Why don't you bring up Hillary or Billy next idiot.