Ignorantly pretend like if you weren't dressed as they insisted you be dressed that they would have let you in. The Vatican does have established rules that YOU have to follow; so, your innuendo that there were no rules in effect governing who could enter is baloney. Originally Posted by I B HankeringIgnorantly pretend? What does that even mean? But, anyway, I wasn't aware of this. Then again, I don't dress like a slob so it would have never been an issue for me anyway.
But I never said "it's lawless!" I (mistakenly, apparently) believed the poster said that the walls keep you out of the country, which isn't true. I just walked straight in.
You mean there are no walls around the Vatican? Originally Posted by LexusLoverNo, I never said that. As usual, you put words into my mouth instead of debating what I've said. I know, this is a bit hypocritical here because I screwed up what nevergaveitathought said, but it seems to be a pattern with you in most (if not all) of our debates.
Did you swim in? Sneak in? Climb over a fence? Wade a river? Hide in the back of a truck?Nope, I walked through the barriers on the St Peter's square side. Walked up to another window, bought a ticket and walked into the Basilica. I left the Vatican, walked to another part, bought another ticket and used that to access the Vatican, again, via the museum.
Your anecdotal story about your ventures into the Vatican are worthless in the discussion.You are absolutely right. However, effectively saying that the Vatican has walls thus the pope shouldn't be criticizing Trump is equally "worthless" in the discussion, considering the pope said, "a person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian."
Get over yourself.No thank you. I'm very content with my opinion of myself.