The newest narrative - White Supremacists and Cartels

eccieuser9500's Avatar
I wish it wasn't so one-sided. If an intelligent liberal participated in this forum, it might raise the overall quality of debate and discourse. Unfortunately, Trey just lowers the average IQ of your libtard team.

See my thread below - it's been 4 years since I posted it and nothing's changed.

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1839056 Originally Posted by lustylad
Have not read it as I post this, but will.

At least his heart is in the right place. Which is more than I can say for Chaps (Sistine). But Chappy knows his ideas have merit.

I'm an old fashioned Lib. Loud and proud to fight for others. I've had to school myself on my philosophy. Luckily, or as a misfortune, not had a mentor. But I still read and hold my tenets worth expressing.

Still a black and gold die-hard though. Can you believe we have that in common?

I don't like the slight of "if an intelligent liberal participated in this forum", but that's par for this course. Too many of us Liberals are just doing the small task of trying to save the world from Fascist conservative authoritarianism.

Me? I'm just here to call it out. Like Noam.

Checking Fascism since the fifties.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=/-gsFb0uSG5w















You're in banking. Not manufacturing.

Of steel. You wouldn't understand.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
I read your opening post. Asking for facts. When building a case for the liberal view. I'm afraid real facts don't matter in the present. ESPECIALLY when this administration uses alternative facts. Or no proof at all. Case in point: the president's assertions of voter fraud. So on 9/19/2016 at 1400 hours when you posted, the world was different. Trey still has as much validity now as any of your side. Or anyone.













  • oeb11
  • 05-31-2020, 04:23 PM
This place used to be so one-sided. And I felt like the only one on the one other side.


Outrage spreads globally following US police brutal murder of George Floyd

https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/ar...f-george-floyd
















Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Thank U very much for the lesson in Marxist ideology - 9500- and your little boy YSL as well.

Even Russia (oooh - collusion) abandoned the Marxist system of socialism because It does Not work.

Please take that lesson to the bank. It is a "FACT"!! - You asked!

Along with Your anti-fa terrorists.
And your elderly idiot Marxist Noam Chomsky.



Consider moving to a commune in Israel - perhaps the only place that your communism ever worked!


But then again - after listening to Robespierre and Lenny Bruce on the "Way-back "radio - You just wouldn't understand - would U???
eccieuser9500's Avatar
George Floyd: more than a dozen major cities under curfew as protesters gather – live

https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/...brutality-live

Donald Trump has been inside all day – no sign yet of him pulling a Nixon and wandering out among the young and the disaffected, aides skittering after him, to take the mood of the times. (That was Saturday 9 May 1970, and you can read more about it here and here.)

















  • oeb11
  • 05-31-2020, 04:39 PM
9500- try the next forum down - Comedy Central!
It is not a question of race, it is a question of justice. No country except North Korea can accept what happened.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
I did not see any post from Trey. Maybe that was your point. This was a classic though:

Sorry Charlie. You're the douche-bag, as usual, on several levels.
The definition of "illiberal" is;
adjective
1. narrowminded; bigoted.

2. Archaic.
  1. not generous in giving; miserly; niggardly; stingy.
  2. Chiefly Literary. without culture or refinement; unscholarly; vulgar.
The only things it lacks are a picture of trump and a group picture of you and the gang'



The words you attribute to Mill are taken out of context and from what Mill calls a "popular dictum". In your world of talking points and tweets, defining it's exact meaning requires more work than you're worth. It is from a lengthy book and isn't a definition of liberal or illiberal.

Since you accept Mill as a quotable and reliable source, a much more appropriate quote would be;

"I did not mean that Conservatives are generally stupid; I meant, that stupid persons are generally Conservative. I believe that to be so obvious and undeniable a fact that I hardly think any hon. Gentleman will question it."

Douche-bag. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman








The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
I did not see any post from Trey. Maybe that was your point. This was a classic meltdown though:

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500



ftfy
eccieuser9500's Avatar
ftfy Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Where's your other masturbatory self-like?











  • oeb11
  • 05-31-2020, 06:50 PM
9500- The police officer was arrested and charged.

It is now about the DPST party encouraging the rioting and violence with their hand-wringing - "You poor things' - we need to help u back to ur proper place on the plantation in Our party.

With a dose of Marxism thrown in. And a healthy portion of TDS and Trump hate.



It is all about the control for the DPST's!
  • oeb11
  • 05-31-2020, 06:51 PM
Where's your other masturbatory self-like?











Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Classic deflection and non-contributory response.

Just the usual from the DPST's - unable to respond appropriately in debate.
After all - it is all Republican whit supremacists - isn't it - just like Lenny, Robespierre, and YSL - all whit supremacists!
lustylad's Avatar
Too many of us Liberals are just doing the small task of trying to save the world from Fascist conservative authoritarianism. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
You were born a little too late for that. The Greatest Generation is laughing at your pretentiousness. Been there, done that.


lustylad's Avatar
I read your opening post. Asking for facts. When building a case for the liberal view. I'm afraid real facts don't matter in the present. ESPECIALLY when this administration uses alternative facts. Or no proof at all. Case in point: the president's assertions of voter fraud. So on 9/19/2016 at 1400 hours when you posted, the world was different. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
So if someone plays fast and loose with the facts, your response is to play faster and looser? Thanks for explaining why liberals habitually lose arguments. You aspire to act more trumplike than trump. The difference is there is usually a kernel of truth in trump's "lies". When he tweeted back in March 2017 that obama wiretapped trump tower, the libtard media went nuts. Sure, Trump got the details wrong, but who looks stupider now?

And which "assertions of voter fraud" are you griping about? The ones where he echoed Jimmy Carter's conclusions about the risks of mail-in ballots? Not only is Carter a democrat, he also has an extensive history of monitoring the fairness of elections all over the world.


Heed Jimmy Carter on the Danger of Mail-In Voting

‘Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.’


By John R. Lott Jr.
April 10, 2020 6:27 pm ET

"Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” That quote isn’t from President Trump, who criticized mail-in voting this week after Wisconsin Democrats tried and failed to change an election at the last minute into an exclusively mail-in affair. It’s the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker III.

Concerns about vote-buying have a long history in the U.S. They helped drive the move to the secret ballot, which U.S. states adopted between 1888 and 1950. Secret ballots made it harder for vote buyers to monitor which candidates sellers actually voted for. Vote-buying had been pervasive; my research with Larry Kenny at the University of Florida has found that voter turnout fell by about 8% to 12% after states adopted the secret ballot.

You wouldn’t know any of this listening to the media outcry over Mr. Trump’s remarks. “There is a lot of dishonesty going on with mail-in voting,” the president said Tuesday. In response, a CNN “fact check” declares that Mr. Trump “opened a new front in his campaign of lies about voter fraud.” A New York Times headline asserts: “Trump Is Pushing a False Argument on Vote-by-Mail Fraud.” Both claim that voter fraud is essentially nonexistent. The Carter-Baker report found otherwise.

Intimidation and vote buying were key concerns of the commission: “Citizens who vote at home, at nursing homes, at the workplace, or in church are more susceptible to pressure, overt and subtle, or to intimidation. Vote buying schemes are far more difficult to detect when citizens vote by mail.” The report provides examples, such as the 1997 Miami mayoral election that resulted in 36 arrests for absentee-ballot fraud. The election had to be rerun, and the result was reversed.

There are more recent cases, too. In 2017 an investigation of a Dallas City Council election found some 700 fraudulent mail-in ballots signed by the same witness using a fake name. The discovery left two council races in limbo, and the fraud was much larger than the vote differential in one of those races. The case resulted in a criminal conviction.

In a 2018 North Carolina congressional race, Republican Mark Harris edged out Democrat Dan McCready by 905 votes. Fortunately, the state had relatively complete absentee-ballot records. Election officials became suspicious when they discovered that the Republican received 61% of mail-in votes, even though registered Republicans accounted for only 19% of those who had requested mail-in ballots.

A Republican operative, L. McCrae Dowless Jr., had allegedly requested more than 1,200 absentee ballots on voters’ behalf and then collected the ballots from voters’ homes when they were mailed out. Mr. Dowless’s assistants testified that they were directed to forge voters’ signatures and fill in votes. A new election was required, but Mr. Harris didn’t run. Mr. Dowless faces criminal charges for absentee-ballot fraud in both the 2016 and 2018 elections and has pled not guilty.

It is often claimed that impossibly large numbers of people live at the same address. In 2016, 83 registered voters in San Pedro, Calif., received absentee ballots at the same small two-bedroom apartment. Prosecutors rarely pursue this type of case.

Mail-in voting is a throwback to the dark old days of vote-buying and fraud. Because of this, many countries don’t allow absentee ballots for citizens living in their country, including Norway and Mexico. Americans deserve a more trustworthy system.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/heed-ji...ng-11586557667
lustylad's Avatar
I did not see any post from Trey. Maybe that was your point. This was a classic though:

Since you accept Mill as a quotable and reliable source, a much more appropriate quote would be;

"I did not mean that Conservatives are generally stupid; I meant, that stupid persons are generally Conservative. I believe that to be so obvious and undeniable a fact that I hardly think any hon. Gentleman will question it." Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
You still don't get it. In John Stuart Mill's era, roles and beliefs were flipped.

Back then, liberals were liberals in the true sense of the word. Conservatives were the counterparts of today's so-called liberals in terms of wanting to control and restrict the lives of the citizens.

So calling conservatives stupid in a 19th century context is tantamount to calling liberals like munchkinman stupid today.

And Trey isn't worth defending. He lowers the average IQ of your libtard team. You already know that. So trade him for someone with an ounce of intelligence, if you can find anyone.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Where's your other masturbatory self-like?

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

living rent free in yer head, lenny