The Newtown 911 tapes were released...

Number one: There were no assault rifles used in that shooting. An assault rifle fires both fully automatic and semi-automatic with a select fire switch. Latter models have a three-shot burst capability.

Number two: Other than the murders and assaults, no CT gun law was broken. Since I don't live in CT I had nothing to do with it and since CT is a bastion of democratic government I guess you have to say that the democrats are responsible for the gun laws.

Schmuck! Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Thought the Bushmaster was considered a assault weapon. You always proclaimed you were one of the elite..

Number one: There were no assault rifles used in that shooting. An assault rifle fires both fully automatic and semi-automatic with a select fire switch. Latter models have a three-shot burst capability.

Number two: Other than the murders and assaults, no CT gun law was broken. Since I don't live in CT I had nothing to do with it and since CT is a bastion of democratic government I guess you have to say that the democrats are responsible for the gun laws.

Schmuck! Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I'm not going to quibble with you about the meaning of the term "assault rifle" you fucking dunce....although you left out the two most important criteria: a medium-sized cartridge and a detachable, high-capacity magazine.

The difference between the Bushmaster that was used to kill those little kids and their teachers, and the Colt M4 that's used by most of our troops these days is, in terms of its ability to put fire on a target, a distinction without a difference.

But, back to your original post...and my question: you indicated that the "elites" were preventing dissemination of the 911 tapes. Who? And, how? Specifics please, you posted it, now tell us what support you have for the assertion.

Second, what planet do you and the rest of the idiots who think like you live on? You know, that planet where the solution to preventing lunatics from killing 1st graders is not to implement some sort of reasonable gun controls that prevent the lunatics from getting an assault rifle, but to require the rest of the citizenry to arm themselves to protect themselves and their children against the lunatics?

You make me laugh. You fantasize about being the Lone Ranger preventing these types of occurrences and saving those poor kids from being slaughtered....fucking internet commando.....I bet you'd be the first one to wet your pants and start crying like a fucking baby at the first shot. Fuck off.

I think everyone should have the right to be armed, Obama making it virtually impossible is just foolish. If somneone wants to reek havoc on the world using a gun they will find one regaurdless of the law. But making sure people can defend their homes without going through an FBI style security clearance is a right which we were given by some of the greatest men to walk this earth.

I think everyone should have the right to be armed, Obama making it virtually impossible is just foolish. If someone wants to reek havoc on the world using a gun they will find one regardless of the law. But making sure people can defend their homes without going through an FBI style security clearance is a right which we were given by some of the greatest men to walk this earth. Originally Posted by Amelia Angel

Where are you coming up with this? What gun restrictions has Obama pushed making it virtually impossible for someone to be armed? Please tell us who in a position of power is proposing FBI style security clearance to own a handgun.

JD, you still didn't answer my question. Who are the "elite". So if I go by your logic in another post, that must mean I win if you can't answer the question. It must just be something else you know nothing about, but claim to have all the answers too.

I'm not going to quibble with you about the meaning of the term "assault rifle" you fucking dunce....although you left out the two most important criteria: a medium-sized cartridge and a detachable, high-capacity magazine.

The difference between the Bushmaster that was used to kill those little kids and their teachers, and the Colt M4 that's used by most of our troops these days is, in terms of its ability to put fire on a target, a distinction without a difference.

But, back to your original post...and my question: you indicated that the "elites" were preventing dissemination of the 911 tapes. Who? And, how? Specifics please, you posted it, now tell us what support you have for the assertion.

Second, what planet do you and the rest of the idiots who think like you live on? You know, that planet where the solution to preventing lunatics from killing 1st graders is not to implement some sort of reasonable gun controls that prevent the lunatics from getting an assault rifle, but to require the rest of the citizenry to arm themselves to protect themselves and their children against the lunatics?

You make me laugh. You fantasize about being the Lone Ranger preventing these types of occurrences and saving those poor kids from being slaughtered....fucking internet commando.....I bet you'd be the first one to wet your pants and start crying like a fucking baby at the first shot. Fuck off. Originally Posted by timpage

I kind of expected you to tell us who those people were since they are on your side. We on the right like daylight. You like shadowy little shitholes.

Here is the million dollar question, what are "reasonable" gun control laws? It seems that the people who are trying to decide that don't know an "assault" weapon from a military styled rifle or carbine.

My personal experience is to approach the target and not run like you. You lose.

Or a so called school teacher who doesn't know shit from shinola.

I kind of expected you to tell us who those people were since they are on your side. We on the right like daylight. You like shadowy little shitholes.

Here is the million dollar question, what are "reasonable" gun control laws? It seems that the people who are trying to decide that don't know an "assault" weapon from a military styled rifle or carbine.

My personal experience is to approach the target and not run like you. You lose. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Declaring victory again. My oh My, JDIdiot, you are sure racking em up.

Problem is that you pay no attention to any contrary viewpoints. So you're basically jerking off in front of everybody. (do you have a picture of YOUR OWN JUNK?).

I kind of expected you to tell us who those people were since they are on your side. We on the right like daylight. You like shadowy little shitholes.

Here is the million dollar question, what are "reasonable" gun control laws? It seems that the people who are trying to decide that don't know an "assault" weapon from a military styled rifle or carbine.

My personal experience is to approach the target and not run like you. You lose. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Not gonna identify those mysterious "elites", eh, fucking dunce boy? So, your post is bullshit, right? We'll wait a while longer for you to identify those dastardly elites that kept everybody from hearing those heartbreaking 911 calls.

Oh, by the way Professor....conventional wisdom is to try to put distance between yourself and a threat. Not close with it. Put in some janitorial overtime at the community college swabbing out the boys' locker room and get yourself some training.

JD, i will make it simple for you, just fill in the blank. The elite are ________. You posted it, you should be able to answer a simple question.

Did they release any pics of Obama taking a selfie at the site? Or does he only do that at funerals?

.. Even after the police arrive they are not going to go in and stop the killing. They are going to set up a perimeter and get control of the scene. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You are totally wrong. After a number of incidents of mass killings over the years the police have changed their policies. They have learned that when responding they need to get inside as soon as possible and confront. That setting up a perimeter and get control of the scene is NO LONGER acceptable practice. Try keeping up. If you click on the link you will find that the entire incident lasted just 5 minutes. Even if someone had been packing as you say I doubt it would have stopped any sooner.

Oh an in case you missed the news, lots more people are packing due to the popularity of the stand your ground laws they are shooting first and asking questions later. Two home owners were recently charged with murder because they saw someone on their property and just opened fire.

Did they release any pics of Obama taking a selfie at the site? Or does he only do that at funerals? Originally Posted by amishgangster

OK... Everybody needs to know what all of these numbers are in your sig line, Gangsta... Who's dick did you have to suck to become Butt Buddy #4?

LMAO!

You are totally wrong. After a number of incidents of mass killings over the years the police have changed their policies. They have learned that when responding they need to get inside as soon as possible and confront. That setting up a perimeter and get control of the scene is NO LONGER acceptable practice. Try keeping up. If you click on the link you will find that the entire incident lasted just 5 minutes. Even if someone had been packing as you say I doubt it would have stopped any sooner.

Oh an in case you missed the news, lots more people are packing due to the popularity of the stand your ground laws they are shooting first and asking questions later. Two home owners were recently charged with murder because they saw someone on their property and just opened fire. Originally Posted by BigLouie

So you make my point. The police have finally started changing their tactics. When does a school shooting stop? When someone with a gun shows up and engages the shooter. The quicker that person shows up, the quicker the shooting stops and the more lives are saved. So what is quicker than having someone already there? Common sense!

As for people shooting first and asking questions later....most of the time when someone gets shot it is in someone's home and not on the street. So your attack on concealed carry is misdirected. I can also point out the increasing number of POLICE shootings where they go after the wrong target.

If you've been trained in fire fighting or self defense you go towards the danger. You pussies can run but you can't hide. If a gunman comes for you in your office that desk isn't going to do you any good at all. The best defense is a good offense. I have already confronted two armed individuals in my life and two other aggressive, unarmed, individuals including a group of six (I know, FuckZups ideal fantasy). No one dead, no one shot. Each situation was calmed by the controlled presence of a firearm and the demonstrated will to use it.

Do you have a "super hero" costume ? Or just jump into a phone booth before you engage all these bad guys?