But this all begs me to ask, “How does P411 get away with breaking the New Laws, they clearly are in violation with allowing donations to be posted, aren’t they?” Originally Posted by ManSlutFirst, I don’t think they’re an attractive target. It’s a private site. You have to be vetted and approved to join. I doubt it’s used by many run-of-the-mill traffickers. We all know LE likes to tout how many women it saved from trafficking when it makes a high-profile arrest.
First, I don’t think they’re an attractive target. It’s a private site. You have to be vetted and approved to join. I doubt it’s used by many run-of-the-mill traffickers. We all know LE likes to tout how many women it saved from trafficking when it makes a high-profile arrest.Look at the case of Kim Dotcom. Feds have been trying to extradite him from New Zealand since 2015.
Second, don’t the new owners live outside the US? I believe someone told me that not too long ago. Feds would have to identify, locate and extradite them…or wait until they show up at DFW International, like what happened with the BP CEO. Originally Posted by TinMan
^^^Thus is some stupid, irrelevant drivel! Originally Posted by ManSlutCare to show your work?
Manny, in his direct way, was saying (I think) that the technological deficiencies aren’t really relevant when the legal environment discourages any material investment in a P4P website. Originally Posted by TinManIt has to be hosted outside of the US and Canada, for sure. I thought that was pretty well covered in other people's posts.
...I screwed up my edited post earlier...This quote is unnecessary, irrelevant, drivel that has absolutely nothing to do with the issues with ECCIE!
The whole hobby scene in Texas is being suffocated, slowly but surely, and Eccie is going down with it. Seeking has become a better option, especially for the high-end hobbyists.
So what would it take?
1. Modernization, with a focus on mobile use, anonymity, and security.
2. A practical way for providers and hobbyists to interact in a meaningful way.
3. Assertive moderation.
4. A search engine with flexible, regional search options, provider services, availabilities, and collated reviews, similar to P411 and AdultWork.
5. A set of killer features capable of pulling the SB-STA crowd back into the hobby.
Originally Posted by ketro
But this all begs me to ask, “How does P411 get away with breaking the New Laws, they clearly are in violation with allowing donations to be posted, aren’t they?” Originally Posted by ManSlut
I screwed up my edited post earlier...This quote is unnecessary, irrelevant, drivel that has absolutely nothing to do with the issues with ECCIE! Originally Posted by ManSlutLet me be clear. Even if SESTA/FOSTA had not encouraged Eccie administration to remove ads and change the rules about female clients and forum interactions with hobbyists, I still think the following is true:
I don't think you fully grasp something key about Backpage. Backpage ACTIVELY worked with local LE whenever there was someone that appeared to be of questionable age. They ACTIVELY worked with the FBI whenever there was a likely victim of trafficking. Despite their continual cooperation-- they still managed to get shut down. Yes, they did leave ads up-- whenever asked to. Originally Posted by Grace PrestonMy understanding of the case was that they switched form a filter policy that blocked entire ads for using language that violated their terms of service and banned posters, to one that automatically replaced those terms with approved replacement words and phrases while leaving the contact information available. Whatever the automated filters missed, human editors would "creatively" re-write. These were documented in internal memos as a way to maintain the ad revenue.