What Does Low Volume Mean?

burkalini's Avatar
Ladies don't take offense but after all the years I have been in and out of this hobby I can honestly say it's still the wallet. Luxie I think your very pretty and probably hot as fuck in bed but why do you escort. " supplemental income" In other words the wallet. If you see one a week it's still about the wallet. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't look for emotional support from the hobby. I'm not looking for a "Girlfriend" in the hobby. I'm looking for a good sexual time. Your looking for a wallet . It's a match made in-well don't want to use that word for the hobby. Everything else is just smoke.
FLReWrite's Avatar
Ladies don't take offense but after all the years I have been in and out of this hobby I can honestly say it's still the wallet. Luxie I think your very pretty and probably hot as fuck in bed but why do you escort. " supplemental income" In other words the wallet. If you see one a week it's still about the wallet. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't look for emotional support from the hobby. I'm not looking for a "Girlfriend" in the hobby. I'm looking for a good sexual time. Your looking for a wallet . It's a match made in-well don't want to use that word for the hobby. Everything else is just smoke. Originally Posted by burkalini
^^^^^^^^^^^^YES. READ THIS TWICE EVERYONE^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Btw words have consistent meanings throughout the English language, if not we would never understand each other. Some words are meant to be vague, like low volume. Lake Michigan is low volume when compared to Pacific Ocean. Meant to be vague because if she states only see 3 guys a week and never on same day, she can get caught lying and that is bad business, so she says low volume keeping it vague. Just another term I disregard as bullshit when shopping. Originally Posted by gentlemantoo
It's not vague. It's relative. Something that is small is relative to something that is big. But, if something is really, really, really small. Then, it is fundamentally small. It is no longer relatively small. It is absolutely small. Low volume can also be absolute in the limit as it approaches zero.
Ladies don't take offense but after all the years I have been in and out of this hobby I can honestly say it's still the wallet. Luxie I think your very pretty and probably hot as fuck in bed but why do you escort. " supplemental income" In other words the wallet. If you see one a week it's still about the wallet. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't look for emotional support from the hobby. I'm not looking for a "Girlfriend" in the hobby. I'm looking for a good sexual time. Your looking for a wallet . It's a match made in-well don't want to use that word for the hobby. Everything else is just smoke. Originally Posted by burkalini
Money isn't the issue this thread is about.
FLReWrite's Avatar
Money isn't the issue this thread is about. Originally Posted by papadee
I agree with this but I believe Burk's comments were made in the context that volume is inextricably tied to money.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 11-12-2017, 07:37 AM
The women I know who make the most money in this business actually see the fewest clients. Ladies who make $25K a night and probably average one date a month. Their clientele demands that they are completely UTR, and if not they are no longer in demand.
Still Looking's Avatar
It means the same as:

SL'S Top Things That Are NOT True

1) I love you, You're not old you're distinguished
2) I thinck you're so big
3) I love it when you do that
4) I can't wait to see you again
5) I really enjoy spending time with you
6) I can't believe you see escorts you're so handsome
7) I almost came twice
8) I love it when you ram your finger up my twat or in my ass
9) I thinck maybe next time we'll try that
10)I want you to really fuck me hard


No such thing as low volume until escorts can't lie!
burkalini's Avatar
Money isn't the issue this thread is about. Originally Posted by papadee
The thread is about what is what is the limit to being
low volume and my reply is it's a marketing ploy to get more money being that getting more money is what I'm a low volume provider is about. In other words THE WALLET. Kronk can read.
burkalini's Avatar
It means the same as:

SL'S Top Things That Are NOT True

1) I love you, You're not old you're distinguished
2) I thinck you're so big
3) I love it when you do that
4) I can't wait to see you again
5) I really enjoy spending time with you
6) I can't believe you see escorts you're so handsome
7) I almost came twice
8) I love it when you ram your finger up my twat or in my ass
9) I thinck maybe next time we'll try that
10)I want you to really fuck me hard


No such thing as low volume until escorts can't lie! Originally Posted by Still Looking

Nice to see you're back Still
Still Looking's Avatar
Nice to see you're back Still Originally Posted by burkalini
Thacnks Burk.
The thread is about what is what is the limit to being
low volume and my reply is it's a marketing ploy to get more money being that getting more money is what I'm a low volume provider is about. In other words THE WALLET. Kronk can read.
Originally Posted by burkalini
I don't know if it's auto-correct, typing on a phone, or what, but I can barely comprehend what you wrote.

The hobby itself is about the wallet, so what you're saying isn't some revelation. A lot of terms (GFE, PSE, low-volume) are marketing ploys, but the ones who practice what they market are usually satisfied with their hobby experiences.

And I'm not sure I agree with your answer that being low-volume = more money..
The women I know who make the most money in this business actually see the fewest clients. Ladies who make $25K a night and probably average one date a month. Their clientele demands that they are completely UTR, and if not they are no longer in demand. Originally Posted by Old-T
That's cause those women probably charge the most..
burkalini's Avatar
I don't know if it's auto-correct, typing on a phone, or what, but I can barely comprehend what you wrote.

The hobby itself is about the wallet, so what you're saying isn't some revelation. A lot of terms (GFE, PSE, low-volume) are marketing ploys, but the ones who practice what they market are usually satisfied with their hobby experiences.

And I'm not sure I agree with your answer that being low-volume = more money.. Originally Posted by papadee
It's an attraction statement. I would guess that the vast majority ladies that advertise low volume either are not or they just haven't got that many calls . There are a few that are working and don't have time for more sessions but that's not being selective or low volume on purpose. Again it mostly a marketing plow. I respect your disagreement but I guess your not being able to comprehend my statement is your way of trying to insult me or you need to comprehend a little better. Either way it's still about the wallet.
The thread is about what is what is the limit to being
low volume and my reply is it's a marketing ploy to get more money being that getting more money is what I'm a low volume provider is about. In other words THE WALLET. Kronk can read.
Originally Posted by burkalini
It's an attraction statement. I would guess that the vast majority ladies that advertise low volume either are not or they just haven't got that many calls . There are a few that are working and don't have time for more sessions but that's not being selective or low volume on purpose. Again it mostly a marketing plow. I respect your disagreement but I guess your not being able to comprehend my statement is your way of trying to insult me or you need to comprehend a little better. Either way it's still about the wallet. Originally Posted by burkalini
No insult intended. The double "what is" and the long run on sentence made it hare to read. Your post aren't usually like that, so I wondered if it was a technical issue.
burkalini's Avatar
No insult intended. The double "what is" and the long run on sentence made it hare to read. Your post aren't usually like that, so I wondered if it was a technical issue. Originally Posted by papadee
You are correct and I take back the insult statement. I did double type it. It wasn't a technical error it was a dumb error. While we disagree on the content I will take the hit for that one.