I think a lot of guys who have "bad" sessions wind up chalking it up to YMMV or "chemistry." And they write a good review because those are "acceptable" norms. BS. If it is a "bad" session, the review should reflect that, yet the guys don't write that way. Plus, guys might think it is their skills that caused the "bad" session, or they don't don't want to write a bad review for fear of being turned down for future appointments from other ladies.So what’s a bad session? Wouldn't that be based on the hobbyist expectations? I'm a non GFE hobbyist so if the lady shows up and little SL is happy so am I! I have read countless reviews where a hobbyist gets, LFK, HJ, BBBJ, CIM, FSMPC. Oh but DAMN there was no DFK? And she could have put more effort into her BBBJ. WTF? Do your research and maybe lower your expectations and things just seem to look a little brighter. Example: I read where SillyGirl won't see someone if they don't kiss. So no matter how hot see might be, why would I see her knowing there is going to be a problem? One thing is for sure. Guys don't write bad reviews out of fear of retaliation. Whether it be WK Syndrome, NBL or being outed. And who can blame them! Just sayin....
So, what you have is a bunch of "good" reviews of ladies out there that are misleading. For sure, if she doesn't have "chemistry" with you, she may not have chemistry with a lot of guys. Your review should reflect that.
If you felt the YMMV factor was extremely limited, your review should reflect that also. She may be doing that with every guy. In which case it really isn't YMMV, it's poor service.
My advice: don't give the lady any benefit of the doubt. If you weren't happy with the session, write a review that way and be done with it. Don't pull any punches. You're not doing your fellow hobbyists or the ladies any favors by white washing your reviews. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005
I thought the purpose of this lovely board was to share information. If the service was bad, you should let others know. I think it would be more beneficial for the ladies to be able to see the reviews so they'd know in what areas they need to improve. Originally Posted by sensualsanaaIDT very many ladies read reviews with that idea in mind. They look for body descriptions and anything negative regarding service. I think most ladies think they're at the top of their game already and any negative comment is a slap in the face and possibly an impairment of future business.
"No news is good news"??Nor did they probably have fake reviews in mind. In this instance, no news is probably better than fake news.
I do not think that letting everybody live in ignorant bliss is quite what the founders of the Escort Client Community Information Exchange had in mind. Originally Posted by Jackie S