Why do we not know anything about the KC shooters?

Now what could be different??? Come on man…if you don’t see the double standard you are politically blinded or stupid! Originally Posted by Charley3

It’s called willful ignorance.

Well there we have it. The all powerful DNC lead by their iconic leader Biden have successfully squelched freedom of the press and are actively controlling the narrative and content across the board including right wing media outlets, independents, and social media sleuths.

Or... the story simply isn't big enough to warrant 24 hour coverage since the Super Bowl and team that won are why the shooting got any national press at all.

Really? You figure 2 dead and 22 wounded (I believe that’s accurate) would get no national coverage at all if it wasn’t at a Super Bowl parade? I find that hard to swallow.

One thing we can be certain of, if the shooters were wearing red hats and used an AR those stats would be a fucking TRAGEDY! 911 reborn. 24/7 in your face stories with rivers of tears from little kids who just wanted to see their Super Bowl heroes (Taylor Swift). Politicians screaming for gun confiscation. You know, that whole thing they always do.

For anyone buying into this 'DNC filter' that our news is all flowing through theory keep clinging to this fairy tale that right minded media is not just as powerful and often prone to spin and sins of omission.

When your thought process has you asking out loud if the Super Bowl as a venue affects the level of news coverage for an outburst of violence then its really not about what actually happened at all.

Really? You figure 2 dead and 22 wounded (I believe that’s accurate) would get no national coverage at all if it wasn’t at a Super Bowl parade? I find that hard to swallow.

One thing we can be certain of, if the shooters were wearing red hats and used an AR those stats would be a fucking TRAGEDY! 911 reborn. 24/7 in your face stories with rivers of tears from little kids who just wanted to see their Super Bowl heroes (Taylor Swift). Politicians screaming for gun confiscation. You know, that whole thing they always do. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Exactly. Not sure how some can not see the bias in the media

The answer to your first sentence is yes! I wholeheartedly believe mainstream media goes after white, straight males with more tenacity.
If someone wants to call bullshit please do. There are dozens of horrendous killings that didnt get mentioned in mainstream media because it doesn’t sell news. In those instances if it was a white, straight male there would be news updates daily fueling the Al Sharptons and other race baiters. Originally Posted by Charley3

It's not getting attn because of political correctness. Narrative. All is driven by the dnc. I cannot fathom how this is even debatable.

For anyone buying into this 'DNC filter' that our news is all flowing through theory keep clinging to this fairy tale that right minded media is not just as powerful and often prone to spin and sins of omission.

When your thought process has you asking out loud if the Super Bowl as a venue affects the level of news coverage for an outburst of violence then its really not about what actually happened at all. Originally Posted by DNinja69

The true right leaning media are not easily accessible to all. They don't come close to ABC NBC CBS CNN msnbc and just about all the newspapers. Not to mention the suggestive advertising being thrown at us 24/7.
So if it doesn't fit the progressive parameters of sensationalistic reporting it doesn't get much coverage. The kc shooter is another case of msm bias.
Hardly any of the msm talk about the inner city gang related murders that happen daily. Wonder why???? Yet when the msm want anti gun statistics they'll use these numbers to sell their narrative. Hmmmmmm

The true right leaning media are not easily accessible to all. They don't come close to ABC NBC CBS CNN msnbc and just about all the newspapers. Not to mention the suggestive advertising being thrown at us 24/7.
So if it doesn't fit the progressive parameters of sensationalistic reporting it doesn't get much coverage. The kc shooter is another case of msm bias.
Hardly any of the msm talk about the inner city gang related murders that happen daily. Wonder why???? Yet when the msm want anti gun statistics they'll use these numbers to sell their narrative. Hmmmmmm Originally Posted by winn dixie

This is a simple concept that some will attempt to cloud by blanket statements such as 'media bias' or by bringing up past stories most of which don't relate to this event at all.

Now we want to draw some line about 'true right leaning' nah bullshit if specifics about the KC shooting were important to bring forward in the way OP suggests there are media outlets willing and able to tell the story.

These 'if...then' exercises became more popular when Trump declared many mainstream news sourses 'fake' and he was not wrong but that does not make everything a DNC conspiracy

The real question is, if conservative news outlets want to have details about the KC shooters so badly, why don't they send their own teams of investigative journalists to KC and hunt down the scoop? What's stopping them? Why are they sitting on their hands bitching about "liberal media" not sharing that info?

Besides the obvious fact that they'd have to hire some real, actual investigative journalists first, what's stopping the newshounds over at Fox and Newsmax from breaking this story wide open?

This is a simple concept that some will attempt to cloud by blanket statements such as 'media bias' or by bringing up past stories most of which don't relate to this event at all.

Now we want to draw some line about 'true right leaning' nah bullshit if specifics about the KC shooting were important to bring forward in the way OP suggests there are media outlets willing and able to tell the story.

These 'if...then' exercises became more popular when Trump declared many mainstream news sourses 'fake' and he was not wrong but that does not make everything a DNC conspiracy Originally Posted by DNinja69

Ostrich head in sand approach? And deflection.
If folks don't see the left leaning bias in msm. You'll never understand. But it's right fore your eyes. The msm narrative is spit out word for word exactly like their liberal leaders vomit.
The kc shooter didn't fit the narrative so very little coverage.
Good grief

Why don't the MEGA's send Tucker Carlson. He did a hell of a job with Putin. He will get that facts! Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

This is a simple concept that some will attempt to cloud by blanket statements such as 'media bias' or by bringing up past stories most of which don't relate to this event at all.

Now we want to draw some line about 'true right leaning' nah bullshit if specifics about the KC shooting were important to bring forward in the way OP suggests there are media outlets willing and able to tell the story.

These 'if...then' exercises became more popular when Trump declared many mainstream news sourses 'fake' and he was not wrong but that does not make everything a DNC conspiracy Originally Posted by DNinja69

Undisputed truth about media bias in 2 words..
Rittenhouse
Sandman

The second got paid biggly from the lefty msm biased lies.
Both are over 18 now so no guideline violation.
So anyone still wanna ignore the msm bias in the kc shooting?

So, that's a 'NO' for Fox and/or Newsmax sending their own journalists to investigate and get the scoop? It seems they aren't trying too hard to get these details. If it's all because of "left leaning bias", what's their excuse?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-not-revealed/

The sour grapes brigade is asking questions... Coulter says its about race. Rittenhouse is promoting a new book..

I guess its true the DNC and ole Biden have a deathgrip around the balls of all media outlets nobody is talking. Or maybe just the officials in KC are taking specific directives from the White House NOT to release the names of minors charged with crimes? Oh how mighty the left has become

When your thought process has you asking out loud if the Super Bowl as a venue affects the level of news coverage for an outburst of violence then its really not about what actually happened at all. Originally Posted by DNinja69

I didn’t say it wouldn’t effect the level of coverage. You claimed that if not for the super bowl it wouldn’t get any. I simply disagreed.