The Official Benghazi Timeline released by the Pentagon

Mark, you're the ultimate dupe. A fair minded person doesn't accept this sort of crap , he questions it. You're just the kind of person this administration looks for to buy their mythology and spread it around, as if it's sincere fact. Our Government is so full of illegality. They put this sort of crap out cause they consider most Americans don't have the integrity to stand for something, so in turn they'll fall anything.

Mark, you're the ultimate dupe. A fair minded person doesn't accept this sort of crap , he questions it. You're just the kind of person this administration looks for to buy their mythology and spread it around, as if it's sincere fact. Our Government is so full of illegality. They put this sort of crap out cause they consider most Americans don't have the integrity to stand for something, so in turn they'll fall anything. Originally Posted by acp5762

+1
Well said acp5762

spoken with hostility and bitterness nevertheless.

spoken with hostility and bitterness nevertheless. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You want some bitterness. Instead of rallying a man and a party. Research some of the people who are a part of Obama's administration. Start with John P. Holdren he's Obama's Science and Technology Advisor. I'll give ya little back ground. This guy is a Malthusian fanatic. He advocates the idea that the root of the world's problems are because of population. He views humanity as a cancer.He also has radical environmentalist ideas. He's wrote a few books. He's a total crack pot. He's not alone in Obama's caldron administrative wackos.

More crazy shit...

This kind of reminds me of the birth certificate thing again. We now have the "official" CIA timeline and the "official" Defense dept. timeline. If everyone is telling the truth why did we need to two timelines (we also have the original State Dept timeline). So we have three official timelines because I guess one doesn't do it or answer all the questions.
Question One: Who told the CIA station people to stand down?
Question Two: Who removed the additional security personnel before the attack after the hole was blown in the wall.
Question Three: Why was the hole in the wall never fixed?
Question Four: Why was personal security being provided by poorly trained, indigenous personnel when it was known that Libya was very dangerous?
Question Five: Why was the ambassador not hunkered down on 9/11 with previous threats known?
Question Six: Who came up with the idea of blaming the video and subsequent protest when there was no protest?
Question Seven: Who ordered Susan Rice to go out and lie (since they knew the video and protest meme was wrong) to the American people?
Question Eight: Why were other assets that were avaible not used to relive the CIA station?
Question Nine: When was the president aware of the attack, when did he first issue orders, and what were those orders? Supply proof since everything a president does is recorded.

Who gives a shit about it.

It was a screw-up; so what's new?

Does anyone at Fox News or the Republican Party really think they can twist these events into a sinister plot in the White House to cravenly let our diplomats and brave warriors be slain by the evildoers?

That dog won't hunt.

spoken with hostility and bitterness nevertheless. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Certainly not up to the level of civility and rationality you so often model for us.

<<<Assup // COG>>>

Who gives a shit about it.

It was a screw-up; so what's new?

Does anyone at Fox News or the Republican Party really think they can twist these events into a sinister plot in the White House to cravenly let our diplomats and brave warriors be slain by the evildoers?

That dog won't hunt. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

These guys are having a difficult time accepting the fact that they have 4 more years of President Obama.

I love watching them beat their heads against the wall!

Who gives a shit about it. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

#1: Some, if not all, of the family members of the dead.
#2: The next follks that are sent over there on "official" business.
#3: The rest who periodically travel outside of this country on pleasure or business.
#4: ... etc. etc.

This kind of reminds me of the birth certificate thing again. We now have the "official" CIA timeline and the "official" Defense dept. timeline. If everyone is telling the truth why did we need to two timelines (we also have the original State Dept timeline). So we have three official timelines because I guess one doesn't do it or answer all the questions. Three different departments...three different timelines, Wow. How stupid can you be not to know that three different departments have different timelines that are all very similiar?
Question One: Who told the CIA station people to stand down? NOBODY...Fox News lied to you. They were trying tro get Romney elected. They also get huge rating telling you stupid SOD's what you want yo hear. Not the truth, but wtf you want to hear.
Question Two: Who removed the additional security personnel before the attack after the hole was blown in the wall. WTF are you talking about? Now your lie is security was removed?
Question Three: Why was the hole in the wall never fixed? ?
Question Four: Why was personal security being provided by poorly trained, indigenous personnel when it was known that Libya was very dangerous? Ex seal team members were provided. People get killed every dayin theUSA, should we provide each and everyone of of with security?
Question Five: Why was the ambassador not hunkered down on 9/11 with previous threats known? Ask him why. He did not have to travel on 9/11. he chose to, you stupid SOB.
Question Six: Who came up with the idea of blaming the video and subsequent protest when there was no protest? Good question, finally a good question. I supect that they were diverting the truth to try and get to the bottom of this fisco. I suspect youthink otherwise.
Question Seven: Who ordered Susan Rice to go out and lie (since they knew the video and protest meme was wrong) to the American people? The CIA? Why not wait and find ot? Who was the person responsible for saying that Pat Tillman was killed by enemy fire?
Question Eight: Why were other assets that were avaible not used to relive the CIA station? WTF are you talking about? You act as if you know more than the CIA.
Question Nine: When was the president aware of the attack, when did he first issue orders, and what were those orders? Supply proof since everything a president does is recorded. Would that be like supplying his birth certificate.? You would/ will not believe anything that does not fit your/Fox News lies. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Go fuck yourself in your God Dan rural farm . Sitck an ounce of gold up your ass and set off a round of ammo in your rectum. Is that clear enough?

#1: Some, if not all, of the family members of the dead. Did you give a shit about pat Tillman's family? No you did not.
#2: The next follks that are sent over there on "official" business. They do not have to go.
#3: The rest who periodically travel outside of this country on pleasure or business.
#4: I travel all over the world. The USofA does not owe me security. I take personal responsibility for my owm security. ... etc. etc. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Fuc of Fuc off and oh Fuc off...

Fuck you. That timeline is the way it went down.M of course you won't accept anything. So just flog yourself shit head.

and tell your teabagging partners the same.


You got anything? Bring it? Otherwise, quit wasting our time with your contrarian drivel. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Fuck you, marks-rocks-with-pee! The time line doesn't include the April and June bombings and why Odumbo reduced security in the wake of those bombings. Nor does the "time-line" justify calling the incident a "civil disturbance" during the ensuing weeks.

Fuck you, marks-rocks-with-pee! The time line doesn't include the April and June bombings and why Odumbo reduced security in the wake of those bombings. . Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Can you prove that Obama reduced security? Him, diectly. If not yopu are a liar.

Nor does the "time-line" justify calling the incident a "civil disturbance" during the ensuing weeks. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That is probably a pay grade or two above your head.

We will see in the next few months.

btw, did you hear that Obama got reelected despite this crap ya'll keep yapping about?

The USofA does not owe me security. I take personal responsibility for my owm security Originally Posted by WTF

This post of yours regarding "personal responsibility", WTF, flies in the face of your previous and sustained advocacy for the government to provide free health care, free food stamps, free phones, free college tuition, unlimited unemployment insurance, subsidized housing, free abortions, etc.