voter fraud commission

More whining from the Twitler snowflakes

Shit is coming at them so much and so hard that they can't keep up with it.

Shoulda nominated Jeb

Half of Detroit votes may be ineligible for recount
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/new...able/95007392/

Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/new...ncts/95363314/

Hillary won Detroit by 95% to trump's 3%. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

One does not have to address voter fraud with measures that trigger voter suppression

That is a good question.....but when states try and shorten the time we can vote that sounds like voter supression.

If you look at the amount of voter supression vs. voter fraud, it does not take a rocket science to figure out which effect the most voters and by a long shot. Originally Posted by WTF

Rather than use the term voter suppression, I would use the term voter legitimization.

One does not have to address voter fraud with measures that trigger voter suppression Originally Posted by WTF

One must address voter fraud and tolerate mild, unintentional side effects.

I would consider it sufficient if the authors of voter fraud actions signed a sworn statement that they did not design the effort to prosecute fraudulent voters as a smokescreen to disenfranchise any voter.