Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' Interview Was Worse Than CBS News Wants to Let On

It's surely par for the course with "60 Minutes" - they're masters
at editing their interviews depending on who the guest is.

Yet-another great failure for CBS. ...

.... Lest we forget that "60 Minutes" also edited the interview
awhile-back with President OBama - where Obama ADMITTED that
what happened in Benghazi was a premeditated attack - and NOT
a few lads out for a stroll.

Problem is - people never heard THAT part - because "60 Minutes"
and CBS edited it out. ... Didn't want the American people to
see that confession by OBama -as it surely would have killed
the main steam media's bullshit story-line. ... And because
the revelation would have proved Hillary Clinton was a LIAR.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Would you PLEASE cite links to support your claims.

CBS News said, its all one answer to the same question edited for time.
Originally Posted by txdot-guy

+1

Exactly, those were her words. The editied content did not come from CBS.

@Waco, no story here, just a nothing burger. Trump is right CBS would not do that for him, however, Fox News sure would. Hannity, Laura "I can't get a date" Ingrahm and Cyrus from The Five

+1

Exactly, those were her words. The editied content did not come from CBS.

@Waco, no story here, just a nothing burger. Trump is right CBS would not do that for him, however, Fox News sure would. Hannity, Laura "I can't get a date" Ingrahm and Cyrus from The Five Originally Posted by adav8s28

i get it. you guys are such Harris fanboys if she said "Let's be clear .. I'm Vladimir Putin's love child" you'd still vote for her.

bahahaha


it wasn't edited. it was a completely different answer. the content did come from CBS. even CBS isn't denying that.

the 60 minutes preview answer


“Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region,” the vice president said in response, on the “Face the Nation” clip.

the broadcast answer


On “60 Minutes,” after Whitaker said the same thing, Harris answered: “We’re not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.”


not even the first answer, edited. a new answer was broadcast.

you fellas know Harris is a word salad nightmare even in the most favorable of interviews. you won't admit the truth that CBS completely changed her original answer, they did.

every interview she does in a desperate attempt to make up for losing the debate she's losing undecided voters. this so-called media blitz is because the polls show it and they have no choice now..


the DNC is in full on PANIC mode and it shows.

Typical for this race and comments. 2 useless dems come on and attack Trump. No real defense for Kamala. Some old it crap.

Their best defense is she's not as bad as Trump, only they're wrong. They can't build up anything she's done, because she hasn't done anything. Other than be the last person in the room for all the bad decisions. Other than lie directly to the American public, He's fine, sharp as a whip, just can't complete a sentence.

Typical for this race and comments. 2 useless dems come on and attack Trump. No real defense for Kamala. Some old it crap.

Their best defense is she's not as bad as Trump, only they're wrong. They can't build up anything she's done, because she hasn't done anything. Other than be the last person in the room for all the bad decisions. Other than lie directly to the American public, He's fine, sharp as a whip, just can't complete a sentence. Originally Posted by heavenlysparrow

At this point.. Hitler would be a better choice than Harris.

At this point.. Hitler would be a better choice than Harris. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Can I quote you on that, kamarade?

At this point.. Hitler would be a better choice than Harris. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

don't try posting that on Yahoo. instant rejection!


bahahahahahahaa

Their best defense is she's not as bad as Trump, only they're wrong. Originally Posted by heavenlysparrow

So...wait...lemme see if I get this...

Ah.

Maybe I got it now...

So you're saying that she IS as bad as Trump then? Right? Whew. Thanks for letting us know. Cuz this was hard AF to understand for awhile...not like that's new..

At this point.. Hitler would be a better choice than Harris. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

An instant classic. THIS has got to be quoted more often on here.

.

If we could come back to the actual topic for a bit...

Accusing 60 Minutes of editing her "answers" is the same old sour grapes bullshit as saying that she was given the Debate questions in advance. Once again, she looked much more coherent and knowledgeable than Trump ever does in similar situations these days. You can't handle the truth.

.

If we could come back to the actual topic for a bit...

Accusing 60 Minutes of editing her "answers" is the same old sour grapes bullshit as saying that she was given the Debate questions in advance. Once again, she looked much more coherent and knowledgeable than Trump ever does in similar situations these days. You can't handle the truth.

. Originally Posted by rooster

not edited. replaced.

So you're saying that she IS as bad as Trump then? Right? Whew. Thanks for letting us know. Cuz this was hard AF to understand for awhile...not like that's new.. Originally Posted by rooster

No, he’s saying she’s worse. That didn’t really seem that hard to understand.

They actually cleaned that interview up??

Once again Kamala proves that you can’t fix stupid.

Their best defense is she's not as bad as Trump, only they're wrong. Originally Posted by heavenlysparrow

No, he’s saying she’s worse. That didn’t really seem that hard to understand. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

More gaslighting. I mean...his whole post is pretty obtuse (often is). But that sure looks like he's saying that they are wrong, that she... is... as... bad.. as Trump.

I'll accept Harris=Bad if you accept Trump=Bad. Seems reasonable.

.

They actually cleaned that interview up??

Once again Kamala proves that you can’t fix stupid. Originally Posted by Jacky S

Not a very good comeback. As has been painfully explained over..and over..and over..these interviews are always "cleaned." For multiple reasons. To claim that they did it in a way to try to make her look "not stupid" is...stupid. Unlike Fox, Newsmax, etc., which survive ONLY by doing things like that...60 minutes would not survive if they did.

I'm not saying they aren't biased. But not so blatantly as to distort her statements in the way some of you accuse them of doing. But you're going to say otherwise no matter what, so this discussion is meaningless.

.

Not a very good comeback. As has been painfully explained over..and over..and over..these interviews are always "cleaned." For multiple reasons. To claim that they did it in a way to try to make her look "not stupid" is...stupid. Unlike Fox, Newsmax, etc., which survive ONLY by doing things like that...60 minutes would not survive if they did.

I'm not saying they aren't biased. But not so blatantly as to distort her statements in the way some of you accuse them of doing. But you're going to say otherwise no matter what, so this discussion is meaningless.

. Originally Posted by rooster

... No, the discussion is NOT meaningless, mate.
And YOU don't know (unless you work at CBS) whether or not
they distorted Kamala's statements.

But 60 Minutes could surely clear up the issue IF they
would just release the whole interview transcript.
Then, we'd know for certain.

... What could be more fair than that? ...

#### Salty