Pimping Reviews

notanewbie's Avatar
So who's getting pimped out? Inquiring minds want to know!

Where might we get a hint that it isn't real or it was exaggerated for free-pussy's sake? Is it when the fee listed is uncharacteristically high? Or when the activities veer away from her usual menu? Oh, to be in the know... I propose the question should be this:

What are the signs that a review is fake, exaggerated, not genuine as an attempt to share information (as is the mission of this site) or any number of falsities? Originally Posted by YummyMarie
good questions

Usually they are easy to spot. Some jack off has recently joined, only has one or two reviews, usually for the same girl. praises her in the most fantastic way. leaves off any sort of negative. (even the best sessions usually have something that is negative).

But some long time members also give those type reviews so we are suspicious they might be doing it for discounted tang. Originally Posted by spear88
the newbies are the fun ones....the long timer..you da' man guys are the ones you have to watch out for. In that case its almost ( well is ) like organized crime.

*and as a side note, this is not about the mods getting free and discounted pussy for quickly verifying girls from the welcome wagon. That is just a nasty rumor and it almost never happens.
One of the gents that reviewed me is supposedly famous for asking for a discounted engagement and asking for a discount. That absolutely was not true in my case so I don't know how much of the rumor mill is true about some or all of the guys out there.

If we are talking about this:

You mean how Tbonetas uses his reviews to pimp his agency girls? Should we ask him how much he really paid his own whore for the overnight?

Or are we talking about something else? Originally Posted by Wakeuр
Then I'm inclined to believe the innuendo. I've heard stories from ladies about him not just you mongers so it's first hand knowledge not hearsay. Not that all hearsay is bad. Where there's smoke there's usually fire, but first hand information is better.
Seedy's Avatar
  • Seedy
  • 10-15-2013, 10:42 AM
Smoke, smoke, that is an understatement OH, I think it is more like a 5 alarm fire. Lol
Eccie Addict's Avatar
OH.... You've had first hand experience with him?
OH.... You've had first hand experience with him? Originally Posted by Eccie Addict
Me? No. A couple friends of mine have told me the shit he's pulled. Very un-cool.
Me? No. A couple friends of mine have told me the shit he's pulled. Very un-cool. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
Please, do tell. Tell everything. Leave nothing unsaid. I invite you and urge you.
I have my haters. I have my doubters. And I have told ladies I will see them, but never gotten around to it. But I tell you now, if I have screwed over ladies and hurt them in any way....I will retire from this game today. For me, this is fun. I enjoy the time I spend with the ladies. I love writing reviews. I have developed a thick skin, can take all kinds of insults. But truly, if I am screwing over the ladies, it is time for me to go.
Sarunga's Avatar
Then I'm inclined to believe the innuendo. I've heard stories from ladies about him not just you mongers so it's first hand knowledge not hearsay. Not that all hearsay is bad. Where there's smoke there's usually fire, but first hand information is better. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
Sometimes I wonder whether Olivia really understands what she posts here. If you heard it from somebody else, it's not first-hand knowledge, it's hear-say.

And yes, if anybody has first-hand knowledge, this would be a good place to tell us.
dearhunter's Avatar
heh
chicagoboy's Avatar
I've heard stories from ladies about him not just you mongers so it's first hand knowledge not hearsay. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
If you heard it from somebody else, it's not first-hand knowledge, it's hear-say. Originally Posted by Sarunga
I may be wrong about this - if so, an attorney in good standing is welcome to correct me - but the knowledge would be second-hand to OH, then become hearsay when she repeats it to a third party.
blowpop's Avatar
They're easy enough to spot. As with any sort of review site, once you read enough reviews from certain reviewers, you realize your tastes and theirs are similar, and their reviews become much more valuable to you.
They're easy enough to spot. As with any sort of review site, once you read enough reviews from certain reviewers, you realize your tastes and theirs are similar, and their reviews become much more valuable to you. Originally Posted by blowpop
Indeed, what pop said. I've found a handful of go-to reviewers on this board, and the discerning hobbyist knows who they are. My choice in providers is almost exclusively based on reviews from these men with similar tastes.

I've always found tbonetas' reviews detailed and very entertaining...especially with the in-session pics. Many thought that last one had the air of "low flying waterfowl" but I wasn't there and privy to details so I can't say. But these girls are grown folks and whatever arrangements consenting adults come to, well...that's on them.

Not here for all the other sh*t, I just came to P4P...and yesterday was the 15th.


LexusLover's Avatar
- but the knowledge would be second-hand to OH, then become hearsay when she repeats it to a third party. Originally Posted by chicagoboy
She just repeated what she claims she was told ....

....... by posting what she claims to have been told.

BTW: There is a rather lengthy list of EXCEPTIONS to "the Hearsay Rule" ... so ....

....... just because it is "HEARSAY" doesn't make it "inadmissible" and not "probative."

....... Additionally, "HEARSAY" is generally considered an "out of court statement" (if you want to call this the "court of private opinion") that is repeated for the truth of the matter asserted in the statement, and one of the "exceptions" is that if the statement made has to do with someone's "state of mind" then it is admissible over that objection.

If one is addressing another's "state of mind" ("motivation") then it would be admissible even though it might be considered as "HEARSAY."

Now if you want to "attack" OH's veracity and credibility generally on the basis that what she has related is not correct or is fabricated, then so be it. That is a separate issue.
R.M.'s Avatar
  • R.M.
  • 10-16-2013, 05:44 AM
I have my haters. I have my doubters. And I have told ladies I will see them, but never gotten around to it. But I tell you now, if I have screwed over ladies and hurt them in any way....I will retire from this game today. For me, this is fun. I enjoy the time I spend with the ladies. I love writing reviews. I have developed a thick skin, can take all kinds of insults. But truly, if I am screwing over the ladies, it is time for me to go. Originally Posted by tbonetas
Remember when you were on ASPD and sent me a pm wanting to know why I was worth 300? Rude!
1800 really?
There is a reason the ladies won't come forward on this board. Any of you care to guess as to what those reasons are? I will give you one clue.....nah....you can figure it out