Quid Pro Quo took place for sure, now what?

I believe that rises to the level of impeachment or at the very least censure with impeachment next if it happens again.

You can not be using the office to bully foreign leaders for dirt on your domestic opponents.


Originally Posted by WTF

What next? He should take the Epstein route. Or . . .


Just kidding. Not yet. The mountain of corroborating evidence from a series of factual witness testimony will continue to pile up. Unless and until the SCOTUS makes all them pussies in the Whitehouse swear under oath, impeachment will be on hold.

Maybe Representative Welch had the best answer for what's next.

This is the second time. I have had to get up out of bed to bitch slap punk ass 0zombies! Keep it up, please. Your destiny awaits you...

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...422721024.html























https://twitter.com/i/status/1177028193569538048









https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...s-Listing.html Originally Posted by Redhot1960

The Biden and Kerry families lining their pockets.

LOL,
Some of you guys crack me up.

International politics is all about one nation bullying another.
So are the Dim's also going to impeach the Turkish leader cause he's bullying folks to the south?

Geez,
how many among you do not understand that war is also international politics.

"War is a continuation of politics" - Mao Tse Tung
"Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed" - Mao Zedong Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Democrats are afraid of what Trump will find out about them in Ukraine. That in a nutshell is what this impeachment is about.

Ukraine supposedly has pics of wtf getting slammed in the ass by chung tranny. I dont want to see that!

And this is how a Liberaltarian thinks...hummmm Originally Posted by bb1961

Who said he was thinking? WTF has the mind of a Grapefruit.

Yes, the quid pro quo did take place...



All I heard today was...



Really???



Only in DC can things be 180 degrees out of phase and make sense to dimretards. Nobody ever said that draining the swamp was going to be pretty and this is about as swampy as it gets.

Who said he was thinking? WTF has the mind of a ..... Originally Posted by Levianon17

When I saw the headline on this thread, I "assumed" WTF was eavesdropping in on the conversationS the POTUS was having with the Ukrainian President regarding military assistance to Ukraine.

Like the "Ambassador" who testified under oath yesterday, WTF got his "facts" from the LameStreamMedia. Only the LameStreamMedia hysterically reports such bullshit.

This isn't a "he said, she said" evidentiary gathering exercise!

This is an exercise in HE SAID, SHE SAID, HE SAID, HE SAID, SHE SAID, ...... AFTER THE FACT ... and as late as LAST FRIDAY!!!!

The Ambassador's STAFFER just remembered last Friday what someone said they were told by someone else who was listening to the POTUS talking on the phone and not only did the someone hear what the POTUS said on the phone the person heard what the President of the Ukraine told Trump on the phone!!!!!!!!!!!

I hope none of you idiots who believe that is acceptable evidence get charged with a crime and are put to trial with that type of evidence .... although you certainly deserve it!!!!!

"Live by the sword. Die by the sword!"

It's your lib-retard characterization that's fucked up. No where in the transcript is there anything other than a President using his Constitutional and treaty mandated prerogatives to investigate 2016 crimes. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Exactly correct - it is a legitimate request to investigate a crime which Biden's father all but admits to while being video taped and bragging about it.

If the US government gives Ukraine 400 million a year in aid, they better listen to what we want.

Exactly correct - it is a legitimate request to investigate a crime which Biden's father all but admits to while being video taped and bragging about it.
Originally Posted by friendly fred

say it often, you might start believing it?

none of you will say why Trump chose to run around the DOJ, and put Guiliani in to conduct a shadow scheme with Ukraine Mobsters that are under arrest after trying to flee the US. you ignore that, doesn't fit your false agenda.

in fact, Trump didn't want an investigation at all. he simply wanted the PREZ to SAY their was an investigation. smoke and mirrors works just fine for Trump's purposes.

none of you will say why Trump chose to run around the DOJ, and put Guiliani in to conduct a shadow scheme with Ukraine Mobsters .... Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Trump didn't. Where on Earth do you get your "facts"?

Guilliani represents Trump personally.

Of course now you will claim Trump isn't entitled to a lawyer.

I hope you never get charged with a crime! But if you do I'm sure you won't want a lawyer, due process, or equal protection.

Trump didn't. Where on Earth do you get your "facts"?

Guilliani represents Trump personally.

Of course now you will claim Trump isn't entitled to a lawyer.

I hope you never get charged with a crime! But if you do I'm sure you won't want a lawyer, due process, or equal protection. Originally Posted by LexusLover

where do you come up with your disjointed statements? what does Trump or me having a Lawyer or not, have to do with anything I said?

ok, the State Department put Guiliani in.. happy?

Quid pro quo...hmmmm, trying to sound smart? First, any qpq (get it) is not illegal. Those three democrats who sent the letter to Zelensky demanding help dealing with Trump or no money...that would be illegal. Probably was because of the Bolan amendment. Of course back in the days of Jimmy Carter, the congress forced Kansas to reduce their speed limit or no highway funds and Missouri to raise their drinking age to 21. All sorts of extortion and bribery going on there.

Ukraine supposedly has pics of wtf getting slammed in the ass by chung tranny. I dont want to see that! Originally Posted by winn dixie

a majority of your stupid posts are direct Homosexual references, you have zero to say about politics. you appear to be a 9 year old boy obsessed with male-to-male sex.

Quid pro quo...hmmmm, trying to sound smart? back in the days of Jimmy Carter, the congress forced Kansas to reduce their speed limit or no highway funds and Missouri to raise their drinking age to 21. All sorts of extortion and bribery going on there. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

sound smart? what is smart about quid pro quo? that term is referenced 100 times a day in the media. a smart person avoids the use of that already tired expression.

the Carter stuff has nothing to do with a Foreign Government, and is thus irrelevant.