The only thing I think you left out Tinny is - isn’t it still a misdemeanor for the ones who self-traffick/prostitute themselves in this Great Hypocritical State we used to love?! Originally Posted by ManSlutCorrect. Which is as it should be, just as trafficking should be a felony. Solicitation should at most be a misdemeanor unless the guy actually does solicit a minor or knowingly answers an ad for same.
I wish we had examples of the ads used? I specifically want to know if it’s one’s that had the rates pre-listed and if the Fucktard shows up after contacting by call or text he is immediately busted, without ever discussing $$, only the when and where? Originally Posted by ManSlutI can guarantee that it wouldn't take much besides a few pics and some general text to get tricks to call and go visit, same as starving people looking for a meal.
BLM, check out the link a few posts above. That’s pretty much all they did.I remember the ad with Chad and Tyrone, it sucks that the guys that don't know any better always get caught up
They at least deleted the photos of Tyrone and Chad. I guess they finally realized it’s unwise to use face pics of guys who most would assume are pimps…inviting a lawsuit from those same guys if they really aren’t involved. Originally Posted by TinMan
It's gotta be this ad, this is basically the same ad from the Arlington sting discussed on another thread.Lazy ass cops using the same ad.
https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...orth/126861750 Originally Posted by FrankTank
Lazy ass cops using the same ad. Originally Posted by Ralph FultsI apologize in advance for being naive, but how do you think these guys were busted? Did they text the number and ask the donation, gift, roses, etc. Or did the person on the other end freely mention the amount? I always thought the John had initiate the conversation regarding payment in exchange for services?
I apologize in advance for being naive, but how do you think these guys were busted? Did they text the number and ask the donation, gift, roses, etc. Or did the person on the other end freely mention the amount? I always thought the John had initiate the conversation regarding payment in exchange for services? Originally Posted by HectorsilvermanInquiring is the first step, probably agreeing this and that for $ was the nail on the coffin. Then they show up, game over