Crucify... Interesting choice of words. Of course you probably didn't know it.
I wonder who's responsible for the unfuckingconstitutional actions of one teacher? At the end of the day, it'll be the district that didn't shut her down.
Read the story and my rebuttal. This story is about one teacher and not the 12 schools in the district. Where is the story about the other schools? You seem to be willing to crucify someone and the district without proof. And you're okay with that. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornWrong on both counts.
Thanks for a bit of sanity, though I would say it should be more than "discouraged" IF THIS IS TRUE. It is blatantly wrong. The sad part is it wouldn't shock me if it turns out to be true. Originally Posted by Old-T
No, if true it is a lot more than one teacher. It would be the entire district and including multiple teachers.Please don't skip over words that are inconvenient to your argument.
And neither of you have an issue with that it seems.
If it is true, of course. Originally Posted by Old-T
Crucify... Interesting choice of words. Of course you probably didn't know it.Why would they shut her down? If this story is accurate, THEY SUPPORT HER!
I wonder who's responsible for the unfuckingconstitutional actions of one teacher? At the end of the day, it'll be the district that didn't shut her down. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Officials defend their employees all the time. Their opinioni is moot for this story. They do what is in the best interest of the school. Now this does not prove that any of this stuff is even true. That is your problem, proof. You have only a partisan legal document designed to advance an argument.No, I am point blank asking you IF this is true are you good with it?
And still you are willing to crucify someone without proof! Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
No, I am point blank asking you IF this is true are you good with it?You finally get to it. Did it happen or not. That has been my stance since the beginning. If you can prove this through a third part or an admission from a participant then get back to me about all or any of the participants. I am so tired of people flying off the handle on heresay. And yes, especially when it comes from the left who never seem to need any proof.
And IF it is true, you want to give a pass to the principle and superintendent because they are just supporting their employee? That alone should be reason enough to get rid of them--management should be setting the rules/standards for this, not supporting a grossly illegal and wrong practice. IF it is happening.
I am not crucifying anyone. I am saying that what was described, as described, is wrong.
Again I ask you, regardless of which public school it might happen in, are you in favor of this kind of teaching one religion and ridiculing another in a public school? If it was a picture oh Buda and daily prayers towards Mecca would you support it?
The question stands whether this actually happened in LA or not. Originally Posted by Old-T
You finally get to it. Did it happen or not. That has been my stance since the beginning. If you can prove this through a third part or an admission from a participant then get back to me about all or any of the participants. I am so tired of people flying off the handle on heresay. And yes, especially when it comes from the left who never seem to need any proof. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornNo, that was not my point and is not my point.