are you this dense?You mean looked in to by your rival political party?
Johnson said no such thing. all he's saying there is no evidence of wrong doing until someone takes a looks into it.
when someone makes an accusation, someone is going to have investigate it to find out if the accusation is real or not.
you're given a presumption of innocence until facts say otherwise.
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
Actually you're now promoting a witch hunt after crying about a witch hunt which exposed you trying to initiate the very same witch hunt you are now back to promoting.in full expectation of a fruitless attempt to make you see the senselessness of your post and in relating it to mine see the below
Originally Posted by WTF
that's what every dim talking head and hellary and biden et al always sayLet me explain how the Dims claim they "debunked" the Quid Pro Joe argument: Joe was acting on orders from the White House. Yes. That is essentially their argument. That the White House had the authority to withhold the money (same argument they wouldn't accept from Trump) and the "orders" came from White House (which was essentially Joe though they claim it was Obama).
"its been debunked"
but no one has ever "debunked" it
what happens instead is the dim news media ignores it
..... Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
ftw... if you know anything about witch hunts, they usually start with a false premise and fake evidence to set some one up.excellent exposition of the distinction
the trump investigation was a witch hunt, fake evidence was used.
the biden investigation is not a witch hunt, biden's statement about shokin's removal and evidence about an illegal funds transfer which was not investigated from ukraine suggest it needs looking into if laws were broken.
like it or not the investigations in U.S. and Ukraine are interwined.
now, why would Burisma issue an apology over the "misinformation" regarding shokin. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
I thought that was what (sic) would call a WITCH HUNT! Originally Posted by WTFToo bad all of your witch hunts keep backfiring on you!
Let me explain how the Dims claim they "debunked" the Quid Pro Joe argument: Joe was acting on orders from the White House. Yes. That is essentially their argument. That the White House had the authority to withhold the money (same argument they wouldn't accept from Trump) and the "orders" came from White House (which was essentially Joe though they claim it was Obama).That is a partial truth or in your case a distortion of the truth which is basically a lie.
Yep, they'll give a bunch of extra rationale (bullshit) but that's it. Originally Posted by gnadfly
Too bad all of your witch hunts keep backfiring on you!Look...I wanted Bloomberg who would have crushed Trump.
Why do you dim-retards keep nominating candidates who are damaged goods?
Four years ago it was a nasty bitch under FBI investigation.
Now it's a senile serial gaffe-maker who abuses his office to enrich his family.
Excerpt from last week's Town Hall:
Q. Do you think Biden is damaged? Do you think he’s damaged?
THE PRESIDENT: I think — I think that Biden has been damaged, yeah. A lot of people. I saw a couple of statements — very strong statements — by very respected people, in your world, saying they aimed at Trump and they took Biden down.
And, really, that’s what happened, when you think. Because you look at the son: Here’s a guy, didn’t have a job, who was unfortunately — sadly, the military was a very sad experience for him. He goes out, he gets $3 million plus $183,000 a month to be a board member of a company that a lot of people said was corrupt. Originally Posted by lustylad
