Red is the color of grading and responding (in this exercise). For my mentees in the workplace I will on occasion critique their presentations in red...did the same for you.
As to a repressed marketplace, two factors in play. Economy for the most part is still relatively stagnant, so as a whole incomes vs expendable income are down.
Secondly, there is a glut of talent in the quad city area (Dallas, Houston, San Antonio & Austin) so the selection is to the buyer at this time. Laymans terms, more hookers per capita than in the past...not more vs the peak, but more vs the norm. Electronic media has made it more obtainable & easier to seek out options vs being in a singular on the side relationship.
Originally Posted by Toyz
You made a point of referring to this economy sir and the number of ladies here in Austin. Do you really think Austin ranks in the same class as Dallas, Houston and Austin in regards to whatever formulae you use to determine Average Hooker Availability / Value that you and the Cheap Bastard's Club employ?
Don't current economic indicators place Austin in one of the top spots across a variety of business journals and financial reports respected for such opinions?
Is it not a true statement that Austin has consistently had one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country these last few years? #2 for May 2014 I believe.
The national average household income rates for households over $100K is 22.24% in a current report and Austin's were 23.06%. I am aware there are less people here and even if there are 600 or more working girls in the area there are far less than in Dallas and Houston I would think. San Antonio seems to be a typical marketplace greatly influenced by culture where certain activities are less frowned on and increased participation brings prices down.
Data also seems to rank Austin as #2 for Base Salary Increases in the country as well as the fastest growing city of six figure professionals.
I believe you are a smart man that manipulates statistics to suit your argument which appears to be an effort to convince ladies of the impending failure of the Austin Economy and how they should be greatful for the lower offers being discussed and grab all they can. I hope they can see through that.
By the way. I love the concept of being Frugal. I am not sure I care for the word cheap.
I believe I represent a frugal decision for a man with more disposable income than perhaps you have available.
A question for you and your analytical approach to "quality" time with a lady. If the time I recently spent with the man that has committed to meeting my needs for a month enjoyed not one, or two but 5 seperate "encounters" during the 14 hours we were together, one of which was coaxed out of him after he claimed it would not be possible, did he see reasonable value for the $400 the evening represented if all we spent together were the 6 nights I minimally committed to? Does it affect your math if I wake up earlier than him and prepare a rather large and varied breakfast for us to enjoy? If my schedule allows for more than 6 nights and I spend 8 or 9 evenings with him expecting not a penny more than the originally discussed amount because I not only enjoy the time and places he takes me but I enjoy his company and want to invest in keeping him interested for the coming month
Would it still have value if the committment had equaled $600 an evening/night?
Most men that have messaged me are looking for a bargain hole to fill and not remotely interested in the type of experience I am used to providing for the Daddy I had. Only a couple have actually attempted to find out what I am comfortable with in a respectful manner.
Thank-you for your interaction. Let me know if you desire all the boring quotes that support the information I stated. I have them here somewhere.
