Santorum's War on Porn

but maybe TV news anchor.

Rick Santorum doubled down Sunday on a campaign promise to crack down on the distribution of explicit pornography if elected president, saying exposure to the content "can be very damaging."
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/


Looks like us in the hobby are in trouble if Rick Santorum wins this Nov!

Careful boys...this is a nice equal dicussion...if the duffusses in the national sandbox see this...they'll over run the area...

Rock on with the discussion...

Both the tea party and the occupiers agree on 90% of what they believe. The politicians and political talkers manage to find the 10% and use that to keep us from talking about what is destroying us. If we set aside our false morality in this country and got the government to work for us instead of the banks and corporations that are robbing us poisoning us then we would all be better off. They have us worrying more about the 'welfare queens' taking pennies while the banks are stealing our houses and our 401k's.

Both the tea party and the occupiers agree on 90% of what they believe. The politicians and political talkers manage to find the 10% and use that to keep us from talking about what is destroying us. If we set aside our false morality in this country and got the government to work for us instead of the banks and corporations that are robbing us poisoning us then we would all be better off. They have us worrying more about the 'welfare queens' taking pennies while the banks are stealing our houses and our 401k's. Originally Posted by malonely

Do I still have to cut the yard when they give my house to a welfare queen?

Careful boys...this is a nice equal dicussion...if the duffusses in the national sandbox see this...they'll over run the area...

Rock on with the discussion... Originally Posted by Raa1965

Do tell We are just such a free thinking group here in Upstate I can't believe that anyone would want to do that.

DD

I will post a linck. You guys are too tame. Four modtards need the work.

Don't worry OSD they won't be giving it to a welfare queen. You won't be cutting it for a welfare queen, you'll be cutting it for the bank, investment banker, steals it from you. Houses are already being stolen, and a little hint, it aint by any welfare queen. Well, I guess it is a big welfare queen, since Citi, Wells Fargo, Chase all got a whole of a hell lot more welfare from the government than a whole city worth of those other welfare queens who waste their welfare on food and opulent homes in the crack district of our cities.

We do have some hope...the EU is in the process of investigting, Wells Fargo, B of A, Citigroup, Chase and a couple others for systematic manipulation of the LIBOR and TIBOR overnight interset rates...since our government in on the take....we can hope the socialist, fashist, communist regimes of Europe might be unswayed by $$$...so they might be willing to due what the "capitalist" are unwilling to do....

Whats with all the "wars",, "war "on all the womaen
"war" on porn

for hating war so much you libs loveee to throw that word around, thats funny

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01-2pNCZiNk



DD

Oh ... or did I mean http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy8c8VR3_ps

:Laughing1:

DD

Don't forget it was our wonderful Democratic governor Eliot Spitzer who toughened NY's prostitution laws. Whatever happened to him anyway? He made a great poster boy for the hobby.

Don't forget it was our wonderful Democratic governor Eliot Spitzer who toughened NY's prostitution laws. Whatever happened to him anyway? He made a great poster boy for the hobby. Originally Posted by Roblestone

Except for brief stints as a CNN commentator and a contributor to Slate, he has been lying low until a recent outing.

Agree, Santorum is a bit of a bonehead! And I bet you anything he watches or has watched porn himself...just trying to look good as the conservative candidate.

Its sad that politicians continue to push to establish laws that impose their moral framework on the rest of us...laws in my opinion are not in existence to regulate all of our personal preferences wants and desires according to the moral code of the President and party in power. I thought laws were in existence to protect us all so we can preserve our individual liberties and pursuit of happiness, as well as to create a society that can function without imploding. The more we establish laws regulating what is moral and not moral, the more we begin to sound more like a Dictatorship than a Democracy. But I guess I am just a dreamer!'

On another note, while I am ranting....the other item that disturbs me about this whole election process is the astronomical amount of time, resources, and money that is expended on a ridiculously long election process when those scarce resources could be applied to more productive and critical matters. Its not like there are not enough such items to focus on in this country. Just think of what we could accomplish by redirecting funds and man-hours" to the issues of this nation. By comparison, Canada can elect someone in about a month so I understand, and England in a few months....why we spend half the term of a President dealing with election/re-election matterse

I want to turn on the news and have more than 50 percent of the airtime covering more than Santorum, Romney, Obama etc.....but again, wishful thinking.

Ok, I done!