Of course not.Well, there is your answer isn't it? If you recognize that it would be utterly inappropriate and offensive to call a native American a "redskin" to his face, how can it be proper to have a nationally prominent sports franchise named the Redskins?
But, in Speaker's Corner in London one time, someone called me a whiteskin...I got over it.
BTW, if people want to give the billionaire owner of the Redskins a hard time, I don't really defend him, anyway. They should boycott games and merchandise, picket, whatever.
I believe it is a credible argument, though, that the name is meant to honor the warrior qualities of the Native Americans, and should be looked at as an honor in its own, old fashioned way. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer
I don't get your argument at all about how the name is meant to honor native American warriors. Did they, or do they, call their warrior heroes redskins? I don't think so.