Yes, he did.
If "Japanese elect Japanese, Indians elect Indians, Chinese elect Chinese, Mexicans elect Mexicans, Blacks elect Blacks" is NOT identity politics, then what is?
Originally Posted by ExNYer
It depends on what is the "identity" ... having close ties and attachments to cultural matters is not "racism" .. unless, of course, you want to redefine "racism" to make a point. Don't worry. You will not be the first to do so. Additionally, if statistically speaking that is for the most part a correct statement then it also is not "racism," but merely pointing out that persons with the same backgrounds, which includes cultural experiences that are different between the races, tend to vote for persons with similar backgrounds. They are not necessarily voting on the race, but persons from their community with whom they identify.
If you want to be precise, BTW, none of those listed are "races" for that matter. They are nationalities, except for "Indians" if you mean the "Indians" who inhabited North, Central, and South America.
If you want to go around slapping labels on people and shoving them into pigeon holes to make a discussion point, try to marginalize them, and/or discourage them from participating, I suppose that is your "right." But expect to get called out on it and challenged as to the validity of your statement.
Are all these "races": Japanese, Indians, Chinese, Mexicans, Blacks? May be you are if you think they are.