your question has been answered. couldn't care less about Hannity's personal life it has nada to do with his job at FOX.Question has been "loosely" answered. How many levels of Factual Reporting does that link you supplied have? Mixed is pretty generic without *how* mixed. Is it 10/90 fact? 60/40 fact? 50/50? Mixed doesn't give much.
what better metric? why am i not surprised you are deflecting? so you think mediabias is inaccurate now after claiming it and allsides are your "go to" sources?
they are mine too, in fact they are pretty much the only two widely used sources.
allsides doesn't rate accuracy. a fact that i find surprising.
https://www.allsides.com/blog/why-al...media-accuracy
Why AllSides Doesn’t Rate Media Accuracy
so unless you know a third source that is independent of any news org's (as in they own or control the site) mediabias rating stands.
actually i'm beginning to think you didn't even know Fox's rating. what did you think it'd be other than MIXED? Fake News? apparently not.
remember it was you and VM that started this whole "consider the source" nonsense and it is nonsense if you only want to criticize the right as biased while ignoring the left's also known bias. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
We'll let Hannity go. Just that he is a hypocrite with a massive conflict of interest on covering stories he is part of.
What exactly am I deflecting? Quite the opposite. Wanting to establish clear content to the level of Fact/Truth with accepted vetting websites. I just asked you if there is a better one for that. *I* think you are deflecting by not using one that you have agreed with me in the past is fair AND has better scale for Factual Reporting.
Showed you in the past that Politico is better than foxy for lean and Factual Content.
