No plan, no strategy, no nothing...

OK Muskogee. Howzabiut you back up your bullshit?

OK. Muskogee. Howzabout I back up your bullshit?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...Federal_Office

Seems that during Reconstruction, there were NINE Blacks elected to Congress.

Spoze that's somewhere near 95%, eh! truckstop?.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Here you go Spam Writer...





Considerable violence and fraud accompanied elections as the white Democrats regained power; they used paramilitary groups to suppress black Republican voting and turn Republicans out of office. In the Wilmington Insurrection of 1898 (long called a race riot by whites), white Democrats conducted a coup d'etat of city government, the only one in United States history; they overturned a duly elected biracial government and then widely attacked the black community, destroying lives and property. Finally, Democrats achieved disfranchisement by law: from 1890 to 1908, Southern states passed new constitutions, constitutional amendments and laws that made voter registration and voting more difficult, achieving the desired result of disfranchising most black voters, as well as many poor whites.
The Republican Party was nearly destroyed in the region. Southern Democrats established a one-party system based on white supremacy. As Congressional apportionment was based on the total population, the Southern white Democrats, the Southern Bloc, came to have outsize power in Congress for decades. "Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment reduces congressional representation for states that deny suffrage on racial grounds," but it was not enforced, as opponents of the South could not get around their power in Congress.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disfran...nstruction_Era

In the 1868 elections in Jones County, Mississippi there were 2500 registered republican voters. In the election only 7 voted. They were almost all freedmen and the Klan "protected" the polling places for the democrats. Jones County also where Chris McDaniels comes from. In fact, Jones County has long claimed the distinction of having seceded from the Confederacy.

This has what to do with Syria?

The Democrats made sure that didn't happen again for awhile.

cf Texas Constitution. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Now it is the GOP you support that suppresses black voters.

Yes the Democratic party of the old South repressed black voters.....again now it is the GOP trying to do so.

What is your point?

That the GOP is the present day racist Democratic Party of the South?

If so job well done even if you are not bright enough to realize what you just did.

Now it is the GOP you support that suppresses black voters.

Yes the Democratic party of the old South repressed black voters.....again now it is the GOP trying to do so.

What is your point?

That the GOP is the present day racist Democratic Party of the South?

If so job well done even if you are not bright enough to realize what you just did. Originally Posted by WTF

LLIdiot and his son JDIdiot have not put together the modern day Republican Party puzzle yet. That is the next edition! However, Patriarch & Son have completed the 1860's era Democratic Party edition.

Patriarch Idiot and son love to talk about the 1860's Southern Democrats, as if those individuals would still be Dems in today's world. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 changed all of that and shortly thereafter there was a massive defection of Southern Dems, led by Sen. Strom Thurmond, who were to find comfort with the modern day Republican Party. The modern day Southern Republican Party voting bloc still exists today.

Action with no strategy ???
You mean like the trillion dollar boondoggle stimulus plan, or maybe the Unaffordable Health Care Act.
Barry's only plans involve golfing and fund raising.

To read all of the expert opinion here you'd think that a ECCIE was the voice of America.
Q

LLIdiot and his son JDIdiot have not put together the modern day Republican Party puzzle yet. That is the next edition! However, Patriarch & Son have completed the 1860's era Democratic Party edition.

Patriarch Idiot and son love to talk about the 1860's Southern Democrats, as if those individuals would still be Dems in today's world. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 changed all of that and shortly thereafter there was a massive defection of Southern Dems, led by Sen. Strom Thurmond, who were to find comfort with the modern day Republican Party. The modern day Southern Republican Party voting bloc still exists today. Originally Posted by bigtex

The same ole broken record. How many times have we heard this and everytime it gets proven false. Still, Tampon has to bring it out again.

This has nothing to do with Syria or Iraq but this is where you idiot friends take almost every discussion EVA.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was not that watershed event that Tampon thinks it is. It was the presidential election of 1948 that he should be talking about. The Dixiecrats (southern democrats in favor of segregation) tried to run Truman out of office. Their candidate was Strom Thurmond of South Carolina. They nearly gave the election to Thomas Dewey of New York but Truman won. So what do you do if you are a professional politician that almost cost your own part the White House? Many drifted over into Republican politics because they were no longer welcome in the democratic party. Others took longer and like Thurmond jumped ship in 1964. Every democrat who defected had their own reasons for jumping ship but the ones who preached segregation in 1965 STAYED with the democratic party; Robert Byrd, Al Gore Sr., J. William Fulbright among others. It was simple numbers after that. There was only one republican, southern senator in 1964. If you wanted to stay in politics then you had only the Republican party to go to. Those defections had more to do with personal ambitions than personal philosophies. Like I said, the biggest race baiters and segregationists stayed in the democratic party. Remember their presidential candidate from 1968; George Wallace?

The same ole broken record. How many times have we heard this and everytime it gets proven false. Still, Tampon has to bring it out again..........The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was not that watershed event that Tampon thinks it is. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

"Proven false?" Now that's a laugh! It was brought "out again," because JDIdiot continues to perpetuate the same pathetic "broken record" lie.

Even Wikipedia clearly states in more than one reference (see below) that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 "bill divided and engendered a long-term change in the demographic support of both parties."

Anyone with any intelligence should be able to connect the dots. Oops, that eliminates JDIdiot from consideration. He has no intelligence!

From Wiki:

Thurmond switched parties because of his opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

The bill divided and engendered a long-term change in the demographic support of both parties. President Johnson realized that supporting this bill would risk losing the South's overwhelming support of the Democratic Party. Both Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Vice President Johnson had pushed for the introduction of the civil rights legislation. Johnson told Kennedy aide Ted Sorensen that "I know the risks are great and we might lose the South, but those sorts of states may be lost anyway." Senator Richard Russell, Jr. later warned President Johnson that his strong support for the civil rights bill "will not only cost you the South, it will cost you the election". Johnson, however, went on to win the 1964 election by one of the biggest landslides in American history. The South, which had five states swing Republican in 1964, became a stronghold of the Republican party by the 1990s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

"Proven false?" Now that's a laugh! It was brought "out again," because JDIdiot continues to perpetuate the same pathetic "broken record" lie.

Even Wikipedia clearly states in more than one reference (see below) that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 "bill divided and engendered a long-term change in the demographic support of both parties."

Anyone with any intelligence should be able to connect the dots. Oops, that eliminates JDIdiot from consideration. He has no intelligence!

From Wiki:

Thurmond switched parties because of his opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

The bill divided and engendered a long-term change in the demographic support of both parties. President Johnson realized that supporting this bill would risk losing the South's overwhelming support of the Democratic Party. Both Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Vice President Johnson had pushed for the introduction of the civil rights legislation. Johnson told Kennedy aide Ted Sorensen that "I know the risks are great and we might lose the South, but those sorts of states may be lost anyway." Senator Richard Russell, Jr. later warned President Johnson that his strong support for the civil rights bill "will not only cost you the South, it will cost you the election". Johnson, however, went on to win the 1964 election by one of the biggest landslides in American history. The South, which had five states swing Republican in 1964, became a stronghold of the Republican party by the 1990s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 Originally Posted by bigtex

bigklan as Grand Dragon of the KKK(D) I would expect nothing less from you... job well done bigklan grand dragon of the KKK(D)... you and your kind... the Ozombies have ALMOST ruined the country... WE will fight and STOP you anyway we can... bigklan KKK(D).

you and your kind... the Ozombies have ALMOST ruined the country... WE will fight and STOP you anyway we can... Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Which part of the Wiki links did you find inaccurate? Please post the verifying link confirming their inaccuracies..

From a reputable source, of course!

Which part of the Wiki links did you find inaccurate? Please post the verifying link confirming their inaccuracies..

From a reputable source, of course! Originally Posted by bigtex

Wiki is less reputable than the KKK(D) library... where ever the fuck it is... Is it in your basement?

Wiki is less reputable than the KKK(D) library... where ever the fuck it is... Is it in your basement? Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

IIFFYIdiot, that being the case; we can ASS-ume that your total inability to find a verifying link as further evidence that you and your Idiot first cousin, JDIdiot, are both full of shit. By the way, the rest of the Idiot KLAN, errrr Clan is full of shit, as well.

Of course, we already knew that!

Well....if its Wikipedia then we have to pay attention. Why did Strom Thurmond leave the democratic party? You know, the party of racism.

Here is the entire passage you lying sack of shit, "Thurmond switched parties because of his opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, disaffection with the liberalism of the national party, and his support for the conservatism and opposition to the Civil Rights bill of the Republican presidential candidate Senator Barry Goldwater."--Wikipedia

And why did Goldwater oppose the 1964 Civil Rights Act? "Although he had supported all previous federal civil rights legislation and had supported the original senate version of the bill, Goldwater made the decision to oppose the Civil Rights Act of 1964. His stance was based on his view that the act was an intrusion of the federal government into the affairs of states and that the Act interfered with the rights of private persons to do or not do business with whomever they chose.[18] In the segregated city of Phoenix in the 1950s, he had quietly supported civil rights for blacks,"--Wikipedia

According to Wikipedia, the gold standard for Tampon, Strom Thurmond opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act not because he supported lesser rights for black but, like Barry Goldwater, he thought it was an intrusion by the federal government into a states issue. See how it sounds when you use all the information Tampon?


Can you also tell me what this has to do with the most incompetent American president of all times, Barack Hussein Obama Jr.

JDIdiot, which part of "Thurmond switched parties because of his opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act" did you not understand?