NYT Report.....Despite 90% Negative Coverage, President Trump's Numbers Go Up

SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
The article is from May 8, 2018 and seems to be accurate. However, Trump's approval rating in recent months has been freefalling according to FiveThirtyEight. Even the Rasmussen poll, which has historically been the most favorable poll for Republicans, has him at a 44% approval rate. Other pollsters have him in the high 30s.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...roval-ratings/
bamscram's Avatar
Munchmasterman's Avatar
Hate to burst your bubble but since trump's approval level is at 40%. That's @ 5% lower than when he was elected.
I know you like to ignore data in the polls you use. Right next to that 50% is 48% for one of the 2 fastest growing groups. The other group is at 49%. Both well within the margin of error.
You act like a one time spike in a group that historically supports dems means more than a 10% drop in trump core supporters. Especially since because of the actual demographic break down, the actual numbers of people are similar.

The insight you claim to have about hispanics might mean something if it tracks actual opinion poll numbers. But it doesn't and you made no mention or prediction about the spike.

And yes, if a white guy says "mojado" to a latino, the ear full you'll get will include talk of why trump is trying to shut down immigration to the point any newbies will be "mojado" instead of green carded immigrants
[B]

Unlike you, what I am not denying is that 50% of the nation's fastest growing sector of the population supports this President. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Once again denial clings to you.
I haven't denied any of this plus I used your links. You deny it by not acknowledging the facts and refusing to accept the other side of the source you cite.



http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...der-education/

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...s-not-so-much/

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/apr...abels-20130402
Hate to burst your bubble but since trump's approval level is at 40%. That's @ 5% lower than when he was elected.
I know you like to ignore data in the polls you use. Right next to that 50% is 48% for one of the 2 fastest growing groups. The other group is at 49%. Both well within the margin of error.
You act like a one time spike in a group that historically supports dems means more than a 10% drop in trump core supporters. Especially since because of the actual demographic break down, the actual numbers of people are similar.

The insight you claim to have about hispanics might mean something if it tracks actual opinion poll numbers. But it doesn't and you made no mention or prediction about the spike.

And yes, if a white guy says "mojado" to a latino, the ear full you'll get will include talk of why trump is trying to shut down immigration to the point any newbies will be "mojado" instead of green carded immigrants

Once again denial clings to you.
I haven't denied any of this plus I used your links. You deny it by not acknowledging the facts and refusing to accept the other side of the source you cite.



http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...der-education/

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...s-not-so-much/

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/apr...abels-20130402 Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
I guess you are scared of the implications of Hispanics not hating Trump when instructed to do so by their liberal benefactors?
What is the approval rating for the shinning star the Dems have in mind to defeat Trump...
They are going to have a VERY tuff time with VERY LOW unemployment and a booming market...
The DEM front runner..."are you better off then you were 4 years ago"
lickidyclit's Avatar
Anybody know what Putin's approval rating is? How about Hitler's after three years?
LexusLover's Avatar
It might be 95 percent negative coverage now, considering that

1. President Trump is still President
2. The Mueller probe is going to be a big fizzle
3. President Trump is winning. Originally Posted by Jackie S
That's all that really matters. All their noise is only pollution.

As for "polling" ... around the time he announced it was in high teens and on June 1st of 2015 it was about 20% approval. Approval of what? His hair do? We already know about "polls"!

Trump is not taking a pay check to do this job. Keeping it in 2020 is not a "positive" for him, but if that's what he wants to do, then that's good for the country. It may not be good for the Clintons, the Swamp Rats, and the "Entitlement Sucklings," but his efforts are providing them an opportunity to go out and get a real job from which they can gain some self-esteem.
gfejunkie's Avatar
I guess you are scared of the implications of Hispanics not hating Trump when instructed to do so by their liberal benefactors? Originally Posted by friendly fred
What he's really scared of is the fact that despite the MSM's 90% negative reporting on this President they just can't move his approval rating below 44-45% (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...ez_track_jan21) and it just frustrates the Hell out of them. Two fucking years of it and no success at all! It worked on George W. Bush. Why doesn't it work on Trump????

People no longer trust the MSM. They trust their President. That's why.
rexdutchman's Avatar
Trust in the MSM that ship is sailing further from the dock everyday,
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Anybody know what Putin's approval rating is? How about Hitler's after three years? Originally Posted by lickidyclit

they didn't have polling in hitler's time.


Putins # is said to be in the 70-80's. his numbers were said to have dropped somewhat over the last few years.
bamscram's Avatar
they didn't have polling in hitler's time.


Putins # is said to be in the 70-80's. his numbers were said to have dropped somewhat over the last few years. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Was that because of his relationship with Trump?
  • oeb11
  • 01-21-2019, 11:30 AM
Was that because of his relationship with Trump? Originally Posted by bamscram

Because Putin bought uranium from the Clintons.
Smells to high heaven even in Putin controlled Russia
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Was that because of his relationship with Trump? Originally Posted by bamscram

no, but more to do with russias economy.
bamscram's Avatar
Because Putin bought uranium from the Clintons.
Smells to high heaven even in Putin controlled Russia Originally Posted by oeb11

chefnerd's Avatar
Because Putin bought uranium from the Clintons.
Smells to high heaven even in Putin controlled Russia Originally Posted by oeb11
And of course you have absolute indisputable evidence of this. Something that someone not a lemming would believe.