meh...I guess at some point this weekend I owe you an explanation on this silly population arguement you seem to be fixated on....I swear youand your in-law must have scrambeled eggs between your ears. I can picture yall sitting in a hot garage drinking cheap lone star beer and coming up with crackpot ideas about population and census numbers. hahahahahaha I will respond sometime this weekend. I will give you rationle since its clear you fellas lack basic ass critical thinking skills.
so sad lol
Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
You're the 'statitician', as you put it, as I recall. Please do refute the 13% number. I showed you the stats from the Pew Research Center, please do show me where it's wrong. I would love your statitician input. I know that you are stringing me along with the whole "I'll get back to you later when I decide I have time" thing. I know. It's just fun fucking with you about it. I'd still love to drag in in on the study we are working on. I would be willing to bet money we would have you nailed down on 90% of your responses, which include both verbal and nonverbal responses.
Here, I'll even help you out so you can do your 'staticician' follow up. This is the link to the study done by the Pew Research Center. It's the actual research done by demographers and it speaks of their methods and will provide links to other studies and results. But I shouldn't have to tell you since you said you are a 'statitician'. So take your time, read over it and let me know where those two people got their numbers wrong. Make sure you pay more than 13% of your attention to it.
http://www.pewhispanic.org/2008/02/1...ons-2005-2050/