Question about Porn Star Providers

Again, At the same time, everyone of us on this board has had un protected sex at some point. So she is no different than anyone else and shouldn't be treated any different. As long as we are all using condoms now and doing the smart thing and taking each step to protect ourselves from STDS thats what really matters.

Kitty, what movies have you starred in?

I personally find the opportunity to be with a porn star a huge turn on. In reality most that I want to be with are out of my league from a $ perspective. I have seen two though in the last couple of years that were out standing sessions at normal escort prices.

One had one of her movies on at the time which was really cool. I think porn stars are likely to be more careful regarding STD's then a typical BP or CL girl.

Take the same care that you would in civi or hobby life and go for it. Unsafe sex is for monogamous relationships only.

I personally find it quite enticing. Nothing quite like jerking off to videos of a girl, then actually getting to hit it. Even better if they're also down for letting me make my own porn with them for personal use.

I just started providing in Dallas and joined ECCIE this week. Before I lived in LA and starred in several adult films and am continuing to work on my career in the adult film industry. There are times when I go to Vegas and work at the brothels there and I'm the feature girl because of my films. I was told by a couple of people that here in Dallas though, my involvement in adult films may hurt my chances of being successful as an escort because guys here are turned off by it. I was wondering-Is that true? Guys, is a girl being in several adult films a turn on or a turn off for you? and why? Originally Posted by Miss Kitty

True PSE experience all the better. From your web site pics I got a yearning for some school girl...barely legal fantasy and role play. Great pics and great breasts!!

Again, At the same time, everyone of us on this board has had unprotected sex at some point. Originally Posted by Kristin Keys

except me! no joke here

you're right about everything else though!

In the end, yes; The fact that a person does bareback in porn is going to bother me. Originally Posted by CDL1

If the fact that someone does bbfs with other people bothers you, you should be no less bothered by hobbying. It's not all that uncommon. You shouldn't be hobbying unless you're comfortable with the idea that you are the only one who uses a condom, since you are theonly person you can know about for certain.

Is it worth the risk?

That depends on how you answer the question above.

Every person will have their own personal answer to that one.

Sure, but if you aren't comfortble with the worst case scenario, not everyone will do very well at evaluating the risk without including some wishful thinking.

Uh huh...so snap some wheels on my ass and call me a wagon! The label "porn star" attached to a Provider hits me the same way as "Estate(s) attached to a development; namely it'll cost more $ and it'll likely not be worth what you paid. I'll take a local Dallas girl over a "porn star" from anywhere any day. Originally Posted by txcwby6

Agreed 100% Usually, reality doesn't live up to the hype. And it will generally cost you a lot more as the lady is living off her "Porn star" billing. I always wondered; If the porn business is so good and lucrative, why aren't you still out there making movies? Also from an LE standpoint, making movies is legal, providing sex for money is not. Why put yourself at risk and not continue to make movies? I gotta believe that you are going to get paid a lot more for a movie shoot than you will from providing 1/hr at a time.

To answer your question; I'm not overly impressed by "ex porn star" on a resume.

Some guys are impressed that a girl has been in adult films. In reality, any girl can go to Bang Bros and work and say she's a porn star. I know a few porn stars dancing in the Dallas clubs for peanuts. If guys have the fantasy of banging a girl that's in a video, that's great.

The truth is that we have many beautiful girls right here in Dallas, videos or not. After talking to and getting to know hundreds of porn stars I see that they're not any different than any of the Dallas providers I have been with.

Here's "porn star" Lexi Belle grabbing some nachos with me at a concession stand. Regular chick, regular lunch, regular day.

Again, At the same time, everyone of us on this board has had un protected sex at some point. So she is no different than anyone else and shouldn't be treated any different. As long as we are all using condoms now and doing the smart thing and taking each step to protect ourselves from STDS thats what really matters. Originally Posted by Kristin Keys

Miss Kitty,

Did you work for studios which required all of their performers to get regular STD exams?

Npita,

I think you have a good point. There is an angle that perhaps guided my thinking. The porn actress has bbfs with the actor. In a single movie, the porn actress may have bbfs with more than one actor. They then will go out and have bbfs with other porn employees and so on and so on and so on. With every encounter there is yet another chance of infection.

The upside of booking with a porn actress is that you get to pay to be with someone who has been on film. There is a fantasy aspect to this and that is a part of what you are paying for. You can watch film and say to yourself, "I have really been with that person." You get to relive the images in your head.


This is a different scenario compared to a provider who has an SO. The provider has her health and her SO's health to consider. With careful research and choosing carefully, you minimize your risk. Do providers do bbfs on their private lives? I am sure they do. But so do the Hobbyists who are married and I am sure that many of my single brethen do so with their SO. But the hobbyist has his/her health to consider as well as the SO. So there is the doubling of self-interest via the Provider and Hobbyiest to play safe.

There is an assumption I make in my analysis and I understand that it is subject to a difference of opinion. I assume that a person who chooses to enter porn is a person that is much more of a risk taker. I also place that risk at a much higher level than the risk a provider is willing to take. As a small example of the risk process, there are many providers that are not comfortable showing face pics. I think we would all agree that a female that chooses to enter porn is not concerned about face pics. A small example but I think it brings the point home.

Could I be wrong in my assumptions with a specific person? Sure. Am I going to pay a lot of money and take what I believe to be a higher "perceived" risk? No. Is there a risk level in the hobby even without the porn factor? Yes.

So, in the end, we are back to my intial post. Is it worth the risk?

Every person must decide for themselves. But that is the Hobby and there is room for us all Each person has their own risk level because that person must live with the consequence of their choice.

Ms. Kitty is a beautiful lady who has asked a very good and thought-provoking question.

Garland Bone: here's a link to where I listed all I could think of as far as films I've been in-http://misskitty1186.escort-site.com/films.phtml There's more then that if you wanna google me and keep looking, they always recycle footage.

Replicant: I've actually been thinking about adding that to my list of things I offer, that would be fun

S-man-yes I do, all the reputable places in LA require STD testing on a monthly basis and if you ever come back positive you're out, I would never even consider working with performers who weren't tested monthly. I don't take risks with my health and lead a very healthy lifestyle, I take care of myself.

CDL1, I completely agree with what you're saying about the fantasy aspect of it and being able to re-watch films before and after the session. That's my take on porn actresses that also provide.

And I do see what yall are saying about porn stars being every day girls and its true, of course girls in porn aren't any different then providers that aren't in porn. What my question was tho is why would having been in porn before be a negative thing? And I agree, I don't think porn stars should charge a whole lot more just because they've done films, which is why my rate is the same as other providers here in Dallas.

What my question was tho is why would having been in porn before be a negative thing? And I agree, I don't think porn stars should charge a whole lot more just because they've done films, which is why my rate is the same as other providers here in Dallas. Originally Posted by Miss Kitty

May be those folks didn't want you to relocate to Dallas? They told you that so you would reconsider.

If you already have reviews on another site, may be those can get you verified on P411.

This is a different scenario compared to a provider who has an SO. The provider has her health and her SO's health to consider. With careful research and choosing carefully, you minimize your risk. Do providers do bbfs on their private lives?

I wasn't talking about what providers and hobbyists do in their private lives. I was talking about what goes on in the hobby. If you are concerned about porn stars because they do bbfs, you should be concerned about hobbying.

S-man, I've taken a break from providing, it was over a year ago back in LA so they won't work for P411, I'm sure I'll get some on here soon tho so it shouldn't be a problem